Thursday, May 24, 2012 3:51 am
Montgomery Blair High School's Online Student Newspaper
Tags: print
Nov. 6, 2002

Election Day results

by Nora Toiv, Page Editor
Election Day proved very exciting and eventful for Maryland with Republican Bob Ehrlich winning the governors race and Democrat Chris Van Hollen winning the Congressional 8th district.

Ehrlich is the first Republican governor in Maryland since Spiro Agnew. Van Hollen ran a tough race and defeated incumbent Connie Morella with around 52% of the vote, according to the Gazette.

The Republicans now control all three branches of the government. Some attribute this to September 11th and President Bush's popularity. The count as of now (there are still some undecided races), is 226 Republicans and 204 Democrats in the House, 51 Republicans and 46 Democrats in the Senate, and 26 Republican governors and 19 Democrat governors.

Bush and former President Clinton both stumped for candidates all over the country. In Maryland Clinton campaigned for Townsend and Van Hollen on numerous occasions and Bush appeared with Ehrlich and Morella, as well. Van Hollen thanked his supporters with an email citing the Democrat’s losses in most of the country but saying that will make him fight even harder for District 8. "Congresswoman Morella has always represented our district’s interests well, but I hope to raise the bar even further."

According to CNN, in Montgomery County, Doug Duncan was easily reelected County Executive. Ida Ruben, Peter Franchot, Sheila Hixson, and Garetth Murray were elected state delegates for District 20, and Tom Perez was elected for county council from District 5. All of these candidates are Democrats.



Share on Tumblr

Discuss this Article

  • Ben on November 5, 2002
    Weird... both people that the Post endorsed that were mentioned (Morella and Townsend) LOST!
  • Elliott Wolf (View Email) on November 6, 2002
    It's 30 minutes after Jean Carnahan conceded and the Republicans officially gained control of the senate.

    It is a sad day for the country. No one group (even the democrats) should have control of the entire US government.

    Currently, the republicans control the presidency, the house, the senate, the supreme court and the governorship of maryland.

    This is a sad day for america.
  • freshi on November 6, 2002
    wow. that's a lotta republicans. that means that we may end up having the war on iraq after all, unfortunately. u of-age-ppl need to get out and vote. stop smoking pot. no war for big oil!
  • Phil on November 6, 2002
    I am a republican and am estatic about the results. I believe this is a wonderful day for America. This country is rediscovering the ideals of the people who founded this country.
  • Nora on November 6, 2002
    Look Republicans did not found this country Phil. You cannot compare the parties of the past with the parties of today. Besides when this country was founded, parties were seen as negative. "Factions" went aginst the constitution. These ideals you speak of, if they are ruining the economy and cheating the common man then yep it was a happy day for America.
  • democrat on November 6, 2002
    damned republicans!!!
    the country is doomed!!!!
  • D on November 6, 2002
    nora-
    what do you base any of this on??? Seems to me (and anyone who's actually looked at the economy) the the downturn we are now enjoying started before bush took office. and what do you base this cheating the common man from?
  • Zach on November 7, 2002
    what's more importaant in the governors race is that the crazy treckie who was all into using government money to find out about aliens got 1160 votes!
  • Nora on November 7, 2002
    Clintonomics had this country 'ds economy rolling with a record unemployment rate. Bush came in and talked down the economy. Over the summer on CNN they would show Bush makng a corporate responsibility speech and as he would talk, the stock market would go down. Bush used insider info to make millions and his VP is involved in some shady dealings, as well. Why do you think the forced out Harvey Pitt? Bush is extremley slippery and when you make money while the rest of your stock uholders suffer, that is cheating the common man. Republicans are party without room for the poor or minorities of this country. Why do you think J.C Watts resigned and why do you think the poor predominatley vote Democrat? The proof is the pudding my friend.
  • Magin on November 7, 2002
    While I consider myself a Democrat, I have to say that Clinton's economic policies were not better than Bush's. At least with Bush we know that the common people will get screwed. But with Clinton, he'd promise the people something and then take it back because he "didn't want to upset the market".

    Also, if around 50 million or so Americans weren't illiterate, the Reublicans probably wouldn't have control of Congress. Still, illiteracy isn't such a hot political issue...
  • Stephen Wertheim (View Email) on November 7, 2002
    Guys,

    Third paragraph: "contribute this" should be "attribute this." Caught again!

    - Stephen
  • Phil on November 7, 2002
    Whoever you are "D" thanx.
  • a conservative on November 7, 2002
    From Nora :: :: 11/6/2002
    Look Republicans did not found this country Phil. You cannot compare the parties of the past with the parties of today.

    Democrats want to turn this country more socialistic. Republicans want to limit the government, such as it was when the country was formed.

    America doesn't give you the right to success - it only gives you the right to try.

    "Republicans are party without room for the poor or minorities of this country."

    Republicans voted 80% for the Civil Rights bill of 1964 while only 60% of Democrats did.

    Republicans believe in equal rights for minorities and whites.

    Nora -

    People from both parties are guilty of corporate corruption. McAuliffe, the head of the DNC largely had inside ties and invested in Global Crossing. His stock went from $100,000 to $18 million. He sold them just before Global Crossing's bankrupcy - the largest in American history.

    And D is right - the peak of the stock market occured during the Clinton administration and has been falling ever since. It was because the economy of the 90's was built mainly on dot-com businesses that were not actually selling goods. When these companies fail, the market drops.

    Nora, you say a lot of Liberal propaganda about Republicans, but where are the facts?
  • Nora on November 8, 2002
    I worked at the DNC over the summer and so I know a lot about the corporate responsibility stuff. the Chairman did nothing wrong. Dick Cheney on the other hand did. Not only did he have seriously shady dealings within Halliburton, he funded Iraq in their war against Iran. What's the deal with that huh? Want to explain Halliburton or how about Harken. The SEC SAID IT WAS VERY DIFFICULT TO DEAL WITH BUSH AND THAT HE WAS VERY ARROGANT ABOUT THE WHOLE THING. Don't you realize that Bush has failed in almost everything he has done in life. The only reason that he comes out on top is because of the connections from is daddy. He can't even put three coherent sentences together on his own. Bill Clinton's intelligence so exceeds that of Bush that it scares me that he is our president.
  • Dan on November 9, 2002
    Nora: I personally find it amusing that you believe that working at the DNC gave you a 'true' view about the goings-on of the Republican Party. Do you really think that the people in the DNC would say anything *other* than, "It's not our fault, it was all Bush?" If that's not a biased source of information and assurance, I don't know what is. I am not questioning the integrity or the intelligence of anyone in the DNC, but it is not exactly an independent source of information.
  • Jeremy on November 9, 2002
    Republicans did not found this country, Federalists did. Republicans don't even exist until 1800. Maybe you should spend more time listening to Mr. Vlasits and less time reading Chips Online.
  • Phil (View Email) on November 9, 2002
    Hey Nora, If bush won because of his 'daddy' than why did his daddy not win his second term a decade ago?
  • Tim Dooley (View Email) on November 9, 2002
    As a Democrat and Blair alumn, I think the fact that this discussion exists is a good thing. However, constructive debate would help more than name calling or insulting other's intellegence. After a reasoned debate on issues that consists of facts and is devoid emotions, I believe that a great many people will see that the points the Democratic party advocate are in most (if not all) superior to those of the Republican party. I honestly fear for the future of this nation, as many of the advances of the last 35 years in the areas of the environment, women's rights, civil rights, and education will be reversed. I challenge you all to be involved in the government in any way you can - and to understand the world around you. If that is done, then I feel that the future will be that much brighter.
    Tim Dooley '01
  • (_|_) on November 10, 2002
    If clinton was soooooo smart, how'd he get himself impeached?
  • D on November 10, 2002
    nora, nora, nora! the issue is at stake here is not bush's intelligence! the attacks you make just make you look like a sore loser, and removes any credibility some of your arguements might have once had!
  • George Koehler (View Email) on November 10, 2002
    In many countries, one party does not rule alone. This happens because the party does not have a majority in the legislature. So the largest party asks smaller parties and independents to join in a "coalition" government that has a majority in the legislature. This is important because it is required to have a majority in the legislature to pass laws and appoint the prime minister.

    In the U.S., we never have coalition governments because not enough parties are in power. We have relied on other methods to keep one party from controlling government. For example, our President is appointed by the Electoral College, not Congress, so when Democrat Clinton was President, the Electoral College appointed him even though Republicans controlled Congress. Another way is both houses of Congress in different parties. Most recently, Republican Bush was president, Republicans controlled the House, and Democrats the Senate. Now that the country may no longer be 50-50 divided, both strategies will tend to not to work.

    One method to end one-party rule is to create more parties. (This is not to imply that one-party rule should or should not end.) How, though? Many countries have parties for certain religions or ethnic groups. (The prime minister of India comes from a Hindu party.) The U.S. is great because our two parties are not based on ethnic groups.

    It is also possible to accept one-party rule. Having Republicans control everything will be good for war on terrorism, war on Iraq, etc., . . . then when Republicans start to mess up, we the voters (well, many of us will reach voting age soon) can drive them from power.

    I wonder what happened to the Democrats. Will they survive as a power? Will they split? Is it time for a new party to rise? Vote in 2004.
  • Phil (View Email) on November 10, 2002
    I am curious as to what will happen in '04. If the GOP will show its stuff it will remain in power. If the economy does not improve byebye GOP. One reason the dems didnt win was because the didnt firmly stand on a strong platform.
  • Magin on November 11, 2002
    Looking at Congress over the last decade or so, I find that I'm not impressed. Why should this Congress be any different? It gets frustrating...

    It's ironic that we have the death of Paul Wellstone, probably the most progressive person in the Senate, right before the elections. The intense media coverage just shows the differences between the secure, smug Democrats and Republicans and people who actually care about other people.

    I just wish there was a truly progressive party in American politics today. I'm tired of being told to vote for "the lesser of two evils".
  • Elliott Wolf (View Email) on November 12, 2002
    I think that Mr. Lasco pretty much summed it up when he said that "American voters are just like American drivers, ignorant, wreckless, and greedy"
Jump to first comment