Saturday, February 11, 2012 11:34 am
Montgomery Blair High School's Online Student Newspaper
Tags: print
Nov. 26, 2002

Die Another Day: How about tomorrow?

by Laurel Jefferson, Page Editor
Let's take a slightly sadistic mind frame for a moment here, and ponder the question of what the easiest way to kill someone would be. Choice A: by allowing a giant ice fortress to slowly melt onto the victim. Choice B: by attacking the victim with a massive mirror reflecting the sun's rays from outer space. Choice C: strapping the victim to a chair and waiting while a sluggish laser slowly makes its way toward the victim's face. Or, maybe, perhaps, we could try Choice D: shooting the victim in the head.

Well, in the newest overdone, overblown, over-the-top, and just plain over James Bond, the final selection is not an option; overly imaginative filmmakers take every possible opportunity to bombard the audience with absolutely ridiculous capture-escape scenes that do nothing to further the plot and everything to further the general aura of idiocy. Yes, the fast cars and gadgets are certainly cool, but, as always, Bond and plot don't mix.

Unfortunately, this time director Lee Tamahori tried way too hard to create a complicated, politically correct storyline, which, when mixed with the inevitable womanizing and ridiculous script lines, merely becomes increasingly preposterous. Commencing with James Bond's (Pierce Brosnan) usual escape from the inescapable, the film subsequently sets up an elaborate situation in which Bond is imprisoned for killing the North Korean leader's son, but really he didn't, or something like that. Who knows, who cares, we're just waiting for the cars and the women!

And soon enough, we get them, but thrown in haphazardly, with even central female heroine Agent Jinx (Halle Berry) appearing random and unnecessary. After James Bond is traded from his Korean prison in exchange for arch-enemy Zao (Rick Yune), Bond is under suspicion for his actions while in prison and for the simple fact that he caused the British to lose a valuable prisoner. Consequently, Bond is held captive by British intelligence, from which he quickly escapes on a quest for revenge on Zao.

Anyway, one thing leads to another, Bond proves himself valuable again, is reinstated by British intelligence, and embarks on a mission not simply to recapture Zao, but to investigate a suspicious diamond miner named Gustav Graves (Toby Stephens).

So where in the basic plot does Agent Jinx fit in? Well, she doesn't, really, except to act as Bond's spunky sidekick. But Berry is necessary in so many other ways; she provides the only true relief from the irritating machismo and raucous explosion scenes recurrent throughout the rest of the film. She is beautiful, powerful, and—shockingly enough for a Bond girl—intelligent.

Of course, the value Jinx's charisma and refreshing honesty bring to Die Another Day are quickly negated by the absurdity of the "evil" female character of the film, the ever-frosty Miranda Frost (Rosamund Pike). Perhaps the most stereotypical ice queen female ever, Frost's character as a British double-agent is underdeveloped and unnecessary, existing for the sole reason that James Bond cannot possibly have sex with just one woman per movie!

That and so many other Bond clichés merely seem outdated now, like the painfully obvious sexual innuendos and the hot new technology we've already seen in five spy movies this year. Brosnan himself is looking more than a little worn around the edges. Perhaps it's time for James Bond to die. And not another day.

DIE ANOTHER DAY (PG-13, 123 minutes) – Contains action violence and sexuality. At area theaters.

Discuss this Article

  • I'm In Agreement on November 27, 2002
    This review is dead on, James Bond is just getting old ...
    And the constant womanizing is just irritating. It's so unrealistic the way he's portrayed. In real life, a womanizing evil man like him would never get any.
  • Phil on November 27, 2002
    James Bond was old
  • luke (View Email) on November 27, 2002
    good god, laurel. why review james bond? it's not supposed to be a good movie. it's not supposed to have a plot. bond isn't supposed to be threatened with a gun to the head, he's supposed to be put in ridiculous situations. the characters are supposed to be stereotyped. the whole thing is ridiculous, of course it is. it's a james bond movie! what did you expect? brilliant acting and gut-wrenching drama? no, no! you went into that theater way too seriously. bond movie are air. they're fluff. they're just raw entertainment. explosions and hot women. and if that's too machismo for you, go see harry potter. if it's too brainless for you (and bond movies are quite brainless) go rent the godfather. bond flicks weren't meant to be criticized, or to win oscars for anything but special effects and editing. so give pierce a rest, and pay homage to (or simply ignore) the dynasty that is james bond.
  • anonymous on November 28, 2002
    Oh, and another thing: Korean's don't have a name like Zao. Idiots.
  • Jennifer Collins (View Email) on November 28, 2002
    The womanizing is annoying and degrading.I haven't seen the movie yet, but I plan to. I've always liked James Bond, because of the explosions and violent deaths. The James Bond movies can be improved.
  • Evan on December 2, 2002
    Seriously . . . an invisible car? Parachuting/surfing through ice floes? Launching a teeny missile into space from a navy ship? I think that Icarus wasn't needed - Goldeneye had already terrorized the world, and something more creative than another satellite was needed. Plus, action sequences were put in slow-mo, which may work in the Matrix but was never the style for Bond movies. I found the film entertaining, but more unrealistic than usual and somewhat disappointing. Although Rosamund Pike looked nice.
  • Chris Mulligan (View Email) on January 7, 2003
    The invisible car is actual technology. http://www.wired.com/news/holidays/0,1882,56621,00.html

    The missile method is at least slightly feasible too.

    As for the name... "(According to producers of the film, the name “Zao” was chosen because Koreans have routinely assumed Chinese names.)" -- http://www.koreamjournal.com/CoverStory_pre.asp

    I agree the time changing was unnecessary. Why can't they realize that bullet time isn't the answer to every question?
  • Sylvia Parr (View Email) on January 19, 2003
    Laurel-your prose is amazing and your opinions perceptive. I foresee a successful career in writing!!!
  • josh on March 26, 2004
    I juat wanted to say this movie destroyed the james bond saga. James Bond is not suppose to get caught, that was the best part of the movies, how he gets away from being captured.
Jump to first comment