Saturday, February 11, 2012 10:23 am
Montgomery Blair High School's Online Student Newspaper
Tags: print
Feb. 25, 2003

Bush losing support abroad and at home

by Nora Toiv, Page Editor
According to The Washington Post, President Bush has been facing increasing opposition to the war in Iraq both at home and abroad.

There have been coordinated protests across the United States and the world during the last few months but Bush said that he will not be influenced by the protestors. According to the Post, White House communications director Dan Bartlett said, “There is always going to be a faction of people that don’t agree. But I think anybody who gives a fair look at history on this will see that this president and this administration is acting responsibly and is attempting in every way possible to resolve this issue peacefully."

Public opinion around the world was that Bush is a bigger threat to world peace than Saddam Hussein. In America, polls have shown that there will be more U.S support for the war if there is international support, which at the moment the war does not have. The Bush administration did not forsee strong opposition to the war when they started publicizing their intentions in September and has acknowledged that they need to deal with it. One ambassador, representing an allied nation, said that Bush has become the enemy.

According to CNN, Hussein challenged Bush to a debate during an interview with Dan Rather for 60 Minutes II. CBS released some of the quotes from the interview which will air Wednesday Feb. 26. Hussein was reportedly very serious and said that he was not joking about having a debate but that the White House is not taking him seriously. "This is something proposed in earnest, out of my respect for the people of the United States and my respect for the people of Iraq and the people of the world. I call for this because war is not a joke," Hussein said.

The Post reported that the director of the Non-Proliferation Project at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Joseph Cirincione, said that the U.S allies were turned off when Bush said that he no longer supported continued inspections. He said that U.S action against Iraq now looks like “an elaborate con job" and that “other leaders feel manipulated and deceived."

Bush sent Secretary of State Colin Powell to make media appearances and to push the war in Germany, France, Russia, and the Middle East. Powell said that he understands the reluctance to go to war. “We know there is great anxiety, that there are many, many people who do not want to see war."

Discuss this Article

  • Anarchist on February 25, 2003
    I read the latest issue of TIME Magazine. It contained VERY recent survey data that presented the views of the American public about the war in Iraq. Apparently, "increasing" protests notwithstanding, a majority of Americans still favor war with Iraq. Only 34% or so of Americans think that the ol' dictator, Saddam Hussein, ought to be allowed to continue his reign of terror in violation of the 1991 truce that ended Operation Desert Storm. In addition, 18 European countries recently expressed support for his removal and the establishment of a free, democratic Iraq. It seems to me that support for the war is in no way diminished - only that the media is now giving more attention to the protesters.
  • ::freshi:: on February 26, 2003
    i think Bush is doing a great job and im for the war so, bomb iraq!
  • pissed of on February 27, 2003
    freshi, I laugh at you.
  • sickened on February 27, 2003
    oh my god. anarchist and freshi: you two are perfect examples of how we live in a society of fear.
  • media on February 27, 2003
    yeah, don't take the news too seriously. they exaggerate everything and leave out facts to support their opinions and attract viewers.
  • Independent on March 1, 2003
    I am in no way, shape, or form a Republican. I strongly opposed Bush during his election and never would have voted for him. However I strongly support his determination to end to the threat of a huge war before it ends catastrophically in future years. If we had taken out Hitler before he gained that much power, think of all the lives that would have been spared. Now with the thread of chemical and biological weapons (and possibly nuclear), the consequences are too high to let a ruthless, power-hungry, dictator gain any more power.

    The media needs to stop focusing on the issues that will boost their ratings. I am tired of hearing about unpatriotic defecting hippies who think all the problems of the world can be solved with good intentions and hope. If you don't like our country, get out.

    Most importantly, ignore everything you hear about the war from anyone. Find information for yourself and develop your own ideas. Any information that is delivered to your doorstep is either trying to corrupt your mind or your wallet. Don't be a puppet.
  • not affiliated w/ BaN (View Email) on March 2, 2003
    Anarchist (please stop misrepresenting), since when has corporate media reported on anything other than what suits its agenda? Since when have they put there neck on the line and challenge an administrations activities in the name of truth? Every intellegent person is aware of the ease at which polls can be manipulated and distorted to portray a certain sentiment. And even if the majority of Amerika did support war, it would in no way justify it. In examining that article, in all the quotes taken from "normal people", not one expresses any anti-war beliefs. Interesting to see after millions of Americans have demonstrated against war, yet their opinions are disregarded and considered "too radical". Did anyone happen to see the Newspeak (or Newsweek) article which stated that the United States has known since 1995 that Iraq destroyed its Chemical and Biological weapons? Its interesting that Newspeak has finally carried this article; it has been on independent media outlets for months...
  • lazarus (View Email) on March 3, 2003
    bush is an idiot
  • unread (View Email) on March 3, 2003
    No rhyme no reason why war?
  • kartina belt (View Email) on March 4, 2003
    i just don't get it ?
    do you think president bush

    is fighting for oil or war aganist IRAQ?
    can you please get back to me.
  • Dan Curl on March 19, 2003
    I've been trying not to post on SCO because I get into long drawn-out discussions which eat up my time, but I had to respond to Independent:

    "If you don't like our country, get out."

    That statement alone cost you any respect I may have had for your opinions on this discussion board. It's the most arrogant, ignorant statement I've heard people make regarding politics. I'm starting to lean pro-war in this issue, so don't go accusing me of being "anti-american", "unpatriotic", "liberal hippie" or whatever else. Now onto my point.

    I've heard many people in the past use the argument that "if you don't like it, leave it", or "protesters are unpatriotic". There's a reason I've been hearing it less and less, and that's because it's hypocritical and flat out wrong. Let's clear one thing up:

    Criticizing the government and/or its' policies is NOT unpatriotic or anti-American.

    This country was founded on the premise of freedom of speech, among other things. It is patriotic to exercise the rights that are guaranteed to you by the constitution. It is unpatriotic to attempt to restrict or restrain the rights of other citizens. The whole point of democracy is that if you don't like how the government is functioning, you try to CHANGE it, you don't just give up and leave.

    Where would be now if everyone used the same distorted logic as you? Consider when slavery was abolished, what if none of the anti-slavery people had stood up for changes in government to get rid of the corruption of slavery? Are you saying that if they didn't like how the country was running, they should have just given up and left?

    I have a feeling Independent and/or other people will take offense at the fact that I used slavery in my analogy, but I don't really care. I am NOT in any way shape or form equating slavery with the war on Iraq. I am merely showing the importance of standing up for what you believe in.

    Criticizing the government is the entire point of being an American. The reason we have Democracy is so that people can voice their opinions and try to change the way the system works. If you don't like something, don't just drop the issue or ignore or accept it. Try to vocalize your thoughts and change it.

    The statement "If you don't like our country, get out." goes against the fundamental values of America and indeed all Democratic societies. It is political hate-mongering and is illogical, hypocritical and destroys the structure of American politics, which were created with the intent of allowing people to dissent and voice their opinions, whether they agree with the majority or not.
  • some one on March 21, 2003
    dan is completely right... if unhappy people gave up reform and left america, then we might have a government worse than Iraq. watch your words independent.
  • Lajamiya Scott on April 19, 2003
    I think that this war is crazy!
    anyway what are we fighting for?
    Are we fighting because of the oil,
    or because Bush wants to?
    Well I will always support our
    troops thats gone to fight this war,
    butall I want to know is why are we
    fighting this war?Why?
Jump to first comment