Saturday, February 11, 2012 5:28 pm
Montgomery Blair High School's Online Student Newspaper
Tags: print
April 7, 2003

Phone Booth: Take this call

by Laurel Jefferson, Page Editor
An entire film taking place in one location, in one such tiny location as a phone booth, sounds more like utter boredom than a tense, superbly suspenseful thriller. Yet somehow, Phone Booth manages to wrack nerves through one single cord and one tiny connection, despite the fact that unlikely hero Stuart Shephard (Colin Farrell) never manages to leave his teensy-weensy booth. And man does that booth feel small after 80 minutes.
official movie poster
official movie poster

Strangely enough, Hollywood bad boy Farrell is the key to Phone Booth’s success, much more so than the elitist-sounding villain over-dramatized by Kiefer Sutherland. In fact, Farrell’s sweat is perhaps the true star, showcasing his extreme nervousness better than any facial expression or vocal inflection. But Farrell does manage to bring exactly the right mixture of slime-ball and victim to his role, turning out a realistic and moving performance.

Farrell’s Stuart is a seedy, money-grubbing Public Relations executive—irritating and smug to the last. See, our poor hero/villain Stuart is just your average sleazebag trying to call his almost- girlfriend Pam (Katie Holmes) from a pay phone since his wife Kellie checks the cell phone bills. Stu’s by no means the worst guy in the world. He’s that double-parked Mercedes, that guy who never tips, that little bit of petty jerk existing in all of us.

But to an anonymous would-be world changer sniper (Sutherland), Stu represents precisely everything wrong with society today. He represents opportunism, deception— someone who has everything but always wants more. The Pam-Kellie situation epitomizes Stuart’s greed and is the focal point of the sniper’s attack on Stuart’s character.

After Stuart phones Pam, he gets a call back, and, assuming it’s her, picks up, of course. Isn’t it instinct, at any rate, to pick up a ringing phone? There’s mystery in the phone, there’s potential, and here, there’s danger. For the caller is the sniper, the sniper pins Farrell in phone position and uses his vantage point to force the sniveling Stuart into all sorts of uncomfortable positions.

This sniper is good. He’s done his research and he knows just how to deconstruct the pompous Stuart from powerful advertising executive to sweaty, pleading, terribly frightened victim. He brings the cops and media to the scene via a pimp shooting everyone believes is Stuart’s fault. And there’s nothing Stu wants less than a slow, painful, very public humiliation.

But that’s what he gets, and guess what? He deserves it. Unfortunately, director Shumaker couldn’t resist making Stuart heroic at the end, couldn’t resist portraying him as having some previously unmentioned inner strength. While Farrell gives an excellent delivery of the ending corny speech, it’s just a bit too nice. It’s a little too out of character. If the film’s point is a social commentary on our own human inadequacies, well, the ending neutralizes that point by idolizing Farrell.

After all, nobody wants to watch a film that hits so close to home and then has the audacity, the nerve, to claim that mankind is doomed. Nobody wants to believe that the day can’t be saved and that people don’t, in the end, change for the better.

Still, ending excepted, Phone Booth remains an excellent film reaching an intensity and tension rarely achieved in today’s generally generic action films.

Phone Booth (at area theaters) is rated R for profanity and violence.

Discuss this Article

  • Jake Summerlin on April 9, 2003
    I got locked into a phone booth once. With another man.
  • Wab on April 9, 2003
    It was a very, very good movie. Colin Farrell is awesome, and it's definitely a change from being an Irish gangster in Daredevil. I think it's stupid it's rated R though... the violence was very weak and the only bad thing it had was profanity. So, if you people are afraid of blood and gore and sex but like good movies, go to this one because the only "bad" stuff it has is cursing.
  • Roger Ebert on April 10, 2003
    excuse me, farrell wasn't the hero... did you even watch the movie? he was the protagonist, but the whole point of the movie was that he wasn't a hero, he was a scumbag. you even say yourself later in the article that he was a villan/hero. go see it again, and get the characterization right.
  • dzn (View Email) on April 10, 2003
    who wrote this article?
  • that other man on April 10, 2003
    jake, that other man was me, remember? we had long, beautiful talks and we kissed, and promised to meet there again later, but you never showed up. now im gonna hunt you down.........
  • Inferno on April 12, 2003
    Phonebooths are SO 1987. Get a cell phone.
  • blazerette on April 12, 2003
    Re: inferno

    true dat.
  • jack (View Email) on April 13, 2003
    The movie was for sadomasochistics who actually enjoy watching people with small sins forced to confess by a threatening disembodied voice. I felt trapped and tormented in a small space. I had to leave with 10 minutes to go in Phone Booth. From what you're telling me, I infer that Stu (Farrell) gave some sort of nihilistic (Oscar) speech to close out the movie, something like, "we're all guilty of original sin, therefore we deserve whatever we get in this rotten world"? Is that it? Is that what I missed? Can someone fill me in? I did invest $10 and 70 minutes of my life.
  • the third man on April 14, 2003
    there were three of us. remember?
  • Laurel on April 15, 2003
    no colin farrell makes a dumb speech about how he loves his wife and is sorry about his mental/real infidelity, etc. but i really did like the movie, just not that speech.
  • Jake Summerlin on April 23, 2003
    Who the hell is this third man. I want everyone to know that he was not there and that he is a liar. I'm no that kind of guy.
  • Ryan on April 24, 2003
    I thought it was good. Very suspenseful and a cool quick film.
Jump to first comment