Saturday, February 11, 2012 4:53 pm
Montgomery Blair High School's Online Student Newspaper
Tags: print
Dec. 15, 2003

Vending machines restricted

by KC Costanzo, Page Editor
Vending machines with items deemed "minimally nutritious" will only be allowed to operate after school because of a resolution passed by the Board of Education (BOE) on Dec. 9. The resolution, which will take effect after winter break, could result in the loss of tens of thousands of dollars for Blair.

Principal Phillip Gainous expressed concern over the passed resolution because Blair’s current contract with Pepsi stipulates that vending machines must be left on during the school day in exchange for the $55,000 annual payment. The contract states that if the machines are turned off, Blair will only be paid a monthly commission instead. “They aren’t going to pay us not to make any money," explained Gainous.

Blair also has a contract with Monumental Vending for snack food that gives the school 30 percent of the gross sales. Should the snack vending machines be turned off during the day, Blair would lose a significant amount of the approximately $20,000 it makes annually, according to Business Manager Anne Alban.

Despite the financial hit schools might take from turning the machines off, Patricia O’Neill, the BOE member who initiated the resolution, defended her stance. “We have an obligation to ensure a healthy environment," she said.

In Gainous’ opinion, the money from the vending machines is essential to pay for new computers, programs not financed by MCPS and test fees for students who cannot afford to take AP tests nor the SAT. “In order for the Blair community to have what more affluent communities can give their students," he said, “we have to have that vending machine money."

Springbrook High School Principal Michael Durso, who uses vending machine money to reduce the cost students have to pay for AP tests, questioned the actions of the BOE. “There’s no way our vending machine companies are going to continue shelling out the kind of bonuses that let us implement these initiatives if we’re changing the rules midstream," he said. “I wonder if anyone has considered the legal ramifications."

O’Neill said there are a variety of ways schools could make up any lost revenue, including a raise in extracurricular fees, a notion which Gainous rejected. He said more affluent schools could afford an increase in activity prices and still expect students to pay, but he did not believe the same would occur at Blair. “The schools who have fewer resources, it’s going to hurt those schools," he said. “That’s not what this county is about."

Some Blair students took issue with the resolution as well. Senior Josh Scannell believes Blair needs the money to provide students with opportunities given to teenagers at other schools and said he is planning a possible protest. “If it comes down to it and central office takes away our money which we need for basic services for our students," he said, “then we will take to the street."

Community Superintendent Walter Gibson said he thinks people are assuming schools will lose money, but he pointed out some schools have introduced measures to limit junk food intake without a significant loss of revenue. “Let’s see what happens," he said. “Maybe we’ll be surprised [and schools will not lose money]."

The reasons for dissent were not limited to funding issues. Student Member of the Board Sagar Sangvhi voted against the resolution because he believed students should be allowed to make up their minds about what to purchase. “We’re moving in the direction of moving away from student choice," he said. “I don’t think it will benefit students."

PTSA Co-President Valerie Ervin found the idea that students should be barred from vending machine items ridiculous. “I think it’s sort of absurd by the time a kid gets to high school to tell them what they can and can’t have," she said.

A taskforce to study alternatives to “non-nutritious beverages" with the goal of eliminating such items from vending machines at some point was created in late October by the BOE. The taskforce met only twice before the resolution extending restrictions on vending machines was passed, and the report the group was commissioned to present was never completed.

Gainous was a member of the workgroup and was confused by the sudden introduction of the vending machine resolution. “Why is this committee meeting?" he asked. “That’s one of the perplexing things to me. Why this resolution that would undercut that committee?"

Gainous did not find out about the vending machine resolution until Nov. 24, or 13 days after O’Neill introduced it at a meeting on Nov. 11. According to Gainous, MCPS principals were unaware of the resolution until a meeting on Dec. 3 when he brought the issue up. “None of the principals knew about this resolution," he said. “If they did, they would have been talking about it." Gainous said he felt the outcome of the vote might have been different had principals been informed of the pending changes.

Approximately 550 to 600 students, or only about one fifth of the student body, take an eighth period class resulting in a smaller number of possible consumers than during the rest of the school day. Currently, vending machines selling soda are disabled all day until the end of 5B lunch.

Council member Tom Perez said there was “no indication" the resolution could be brought before the County Council to be overturned.

A second resolution that would have removed vending machines from the entrances of schools did not pass by one vote.

Additional reporting by Easha Anand and Izaak Orlansky

Discuss this Article

  • activist on December 15, 2003
    Feel free to share your thoughts with the board of education at boe@fc.mcps.k12.md.us

    Individual phone numbers of board members can be obtained at http://www.mcps.k12.md.us/boe/about/members/

    You may want to ask them:

    - If marginal health benefits are worth depriving blair students of the best education blair can possibly provide.

    - If they plan to reimburse blair the thousands of dollars it will lose if it complies for breach of contract with Pepsi.

    - If anyone is restricting when or what the board members choose to eat.

    Please include your own thoughts, and be sure to tell them who you are: a proud blazer, blair parent, alum, or maybe a concerned citizen. Show them we care and that they can't impose misguided regulations at the cost of our education!
  • Erica on December 15, 2003
    How will turning off the vending machines make a healthier environment? You can already buy all kinds of candy and junk food in the school store. And the lunch lines sell ice cream and french fries, for gods sake! This will not result in anything but loss of money for the school.
  • B-Cheese on December 15, 2003
    Last time I checked, everyone knows that a jumbo honey bun has 900 calories. Its not that students are ignorant. That's what health class is for.

    What if I really need a lot of calories? Maybe I'm tired and I have a dance performance later in the day. Sometimes a jumbo huney bun is exactly what i need.
  • alera on December 15, 2003
    the answer is simple: put healthier food in the vending machines...its not that hard people. the school store sells a bunch a junk...why don't you do something about that Gainous? its not that students are ignorant about their health, the vending machines are a matter of convenience in our over populated school. the lunch lines are WAY too long and most students don't have time to make a lunch, not to mention breakfast. taking away the vending machines=more of a hassal.>
  • peemo on December 15, 2003
    I WANT FOOD!
  • susan (View Email) on December 15, 2003
    I do have a potential solution to Dr. Gainous' dilemma regarding the loss of the "pouring contract." Vendors such as Coke and Pepsi also make juices, sports drinks, and bottled water. At least one private school I know of which had the same problem simply arranged for their contract holder (in this case, Coke) to replace the sodas with allowable beverages (whatever the County may deem these to be.) This allowed that school to continue to receive money for having the machines on during the designated hours, without violating the nutritional guidelines. I suggest that a similar measure be instituted for Blair. Although I sympathize with the need for funds that the vending machines bring, it is really coming at the expense of the students' health. I disagree that teenagers will necessarily make appropriate nutritional choices. Teens notoriously feel invulnerable, and make many poor choices (e.g. drinking, durgs, not wearing seatbelts, etc.) Consequences of obesity, including type 2 diabetes, are increasing dramatically in the adolescent population -- especially among minority teens. We need to work together to find thoughtful and appropriate ways to address these issues, and that includes finding ways to help our kids improve their nutrition in school as well as at home.
  • Anarchist on December 15, 2003
    Yep, now our Big Brother the Board of Education knows what we should and shouldn't be drinking. Watch out folks, breathing unfiltered air will be next on the list!
  • Jason Bourne on December 16, 2003
    Said the county superintendent: "Maybe we’ll be surprised [and schools will not lose money]."

    Is he kidding???

    Because obviously that lost revenue will just magically be compensate for some other way.

    Right, and maybe pigs will fly too.
  • Liz on December 16, 2003
    This is ridiculous... Of course most other schools in MCPS can afford to turn off vending machines during the school day. Has anyone ever been to Patomac? They can just compensate for lost revenues by charging more for extracirricular junx.It's not like this is going to make a healthier environment for anyone. THERE IS A MCDONALD'S ACCROSS THE STREET
  • Elliott Wolf (View Email) on December 16, 2003
    1. Unplug soda machine
    2. Wait 5 minutes
    3. Plug in soda machine
    4. Insert dollar
    5. Press selection
    6. Enjoy!
  • stimpy REP'N 06 on December 16, 2003
    Im getting real tired of administrations knowing whats good enough for our health. The closing of vending machines takes away our rights in a way, what the heck happens when hunger kicks in?School lunch sux, come on someone read this and think what they're doing. We want to raise our economy at blair, why take that away!
  • Double Scoop on December 16, 2003
    It's not the schools fault that students dont know how to eat healthy. Those who are really watching what they eat know better than to gorge themselves on food from vending machines. If the students dont want anything from a "healthy" vending machine, then they wont get it, which will be the case for most students. Therefore, these new vending machines will be a waste of electicity. And im sure most kids can say that school is not their most abundant junk food provider, so getting rid of our vending machines is not going to rectify the problem. There are places to get even less nutritious food, eg. the lunch lines.
  • Sparky the Happy Giraffe on December 16, 2003
    pigs do fly, havent u listened 2 pink floyd's album 'animals'?
  • sheryl on December 16, 2003
    if I want diabetes thats my friggin' business...they are restricting what I eat..now are they gonna wanna tuck us in bed at night??? they are giving themselves wayyyy too much power. They aren't our parents and they really don't have a say in what kids eat. Whos watching what they are eating??? maybe there should be mandatory exercise classes for our over weight security guards and teachers.....hmmm hypocrites??????
  • healthygirl on December 16, 2003
    Liz: it's POTOMAC. YOU LIVE IN THIS COUNTY. ignorance like this is proof that teens like you CANNOT make smart decisions about what to eat.

    teenage obesity is on the rise, and i have no intention of paying for your health care when i pay taxes.

    obesity is caused by a) junk food, b) lack of exercise, or c) both. if you eat say, carrots + water, but don't exercise, you won't gain weight. if you eat honey buns + don't exercise, you will gain weight. if you actually exercise, you won't gain weight. so many people, i.e. the fat people, in this school don't exercise, or if they do, it doesn't show. stop eating junk food. junk food is bad for you. just like drugs are bad for you.

    the school's doing a horrible job of providing NUTRITIOUS, HEALTHY meals for students. the school serves junk food [french fries burgers], because it is cheap. money should not be the concern; your health should. i don't want to pay for your medicare one day.
  • Lets think on December 16, 2003
    I agree that health is an important issue, and yes it does need to be delt with. I can understand the reasons for wanting to turn off the vending machines but just as many other have said, at the same time, we might as well close the school store and lunch lines. The amount of fat and calories in a cup of french fries, or a thing of Nachos is unbelievable compared to the fat in something from the vending machines. Come on now, lets look at the real problems first. I have a hard time understanding why the county is out to undercut Blair. First they plan to redistrict schools, taking away most of the money from Blair, now the county wants to shut down one of the main sources of income for the school. Yes, clearly, the health of our students is the biggest issue here. By the way, healthygirl, you have your reasons and your opinions, however there is no reason to go after one of your classmates just because you don't agree with what they said. Remember, the tables can turn, if you were to have a disease or something and need medicare, who would you be expecting to pay up?
  • Heather (View Email) on December 16, 2003
    healthygirl- you're being ignorant just by saying that obesity is caused by only 3 things. It's also genetic. And you're ranting about paying for someone's health care with your taxes and whatnot. First off, unless the person is unemployeed or a senior citizen, you won't be paying for their health care. that's why employers provide health insurance. And last I knew, not all overweight people are unemployed. As a matter of fact, I'm fat (yeah, that's right, I said it) and I have a job AND I pay taxes.


    And how hypocritical is it when you're saying that our health should be the main concern, not money, and you're babbling on and on about how you don't want to pay for our health care with your taxes, etc...?
  • fghj on December 16, 2003
    healthygirl- wasn't medicare taken out?

    anyway..I didn't know people eat "french fries burgers"

    Also.."the fat people, in this school don't exercise"...you relly need to watch what you say..it could offend somebody
  • Responsible Individual (View Email) on December 16, 2003
    I must say that I am surprised and dissapointed at the outrage of Blazers on this decision by the board. Compared to many of the far more draconian policies our administration has taken, there is much mor to be angry about besides that we cant buy honey buns anymore. The fact that Blair has a contract with Pepsi to begin with is outrageous in my view. Students should be safe from corporate advertising in schools, but instead, administration sells out to them instead of examining ways to fight back and take some risks to challenge the serious lack of funding in public schools. No, its much easier and profitable to simply contract our students health and saftey out to multi-nationals who package many of their products in third world countries and help roll back civil liberties and labor rights. No need to look at what is actually in that candy and soda and see the human and animal exploitation that comes fresh in every bag or bottle. After all, its our right to destroy ourselves (and exploit everything around us)!

    I would encourage students to take those numbers that "activist" provided, call them, email them, etc. and tell them that your health and right to an enviornment free from corporate advertising is not worth selling off to the highest bidder. Thank them for their decision, and if your worried about funding, tell them! When our schools cannot adequately be funded because our government spends more on funding occupations and militarizations, we can take action. The fact that we must take these contracts show that perhaps we have already reached this point. Maybe we should start raising our voices and fists and calling for changes now...
  • Dup with 2 e's on December 16, 2003
    WOAH WOAH WOAH!!! Those vending machines happen to provide me with the necessary sugar and caffine to get me through my classes. Granted I wouldn't need that sugar and caffine if I could get a decent 9 hours a sleep a night. But I must take into consideration that I have many after school activities to be a "well rounded" student in my future college applications. And I am completing the majority of my homework so I don't fail my classes. And that homework can and does take till 1 am to finish occasionally. And there is the fact that school starts at an absurd 7:25 am. So turning off the vending machines until after school would result in...me not graduating. Thanks Mo. County, I love you!
  • daniel bates (View Email) on December 16, 2003
    It stuns me that BOE can pretend that there are any "healthy" options in the schools to begin with. Unless things have radically changed since I was there, the best I could say about anything on the menu was that mabye some of it wasn't extremely bad for you. Now they want to restrict sodas and such? Silly.

    Reform the provided school food, and then we'll talk about changing the options for students.
  • ... on December 17, 2003
    I actually agree in a more calmer way with healty_girl. Obesity is everywhere. It needs to be brought to people's attention that people are living very unhealthy lives. The only way obesity could be genetic is if you have a hypothyroid, which affects your body weight because of a secretion of certain hormones. Even so, with proper exercise and diet you do not have to be "fat". Even the casual candy bar will pack on 7 lbs over a year. America's advertising and general opinion is that being overweight is okay, it's not! Being overweight causes multiple problems including immature death (meaning you die sooner from causes such as heart attacks, strokes, or even form diabeties). The reason America states it's "alright" is because of the emotional impact of obesity and the drastic measures people take to be THIN, not FIT. Thin and Fit are very different.

    Being lean with healthy bones and well toned muscles = Good.

    Being all bones and skin with no muscles because your body ate it away from starving = Bad.

    Just do your exercise, and next time you get that sugar or fatty food craving, think again and grab some celery.
  • Blazer3D on December 17, 2003
    obesity being genetic is just something fat people say to make an excuse for them being lazy and eating too much
  • B-Cheese on December 17, 2003
    Being fat has to do with the relative speed of your metabolism, that is all chemical reactions within your body.

    Some people, like myself, have naturally fast metabolism, so no matter how much coke and combos i eat i stay skinny. I eat horribley as a matter of fact and if you wanna come see how health i am let me now.

    It IS genetic to a degree. But also I think exercise is even more important than eating well. If you cut fat in your diet that doesn't necessarily mean you wont get fat. Direct consumption of fat is not in fact what makes you fat. This is a common misconception.
  • whats this!?!? on December 17, 2003
    i dont really think its the unhealthy food thats making kids bigger and unhealthy. if they have a probelm with their weight, i think they are old enough and responsible enough to tell themselfs to step away from the junk. we are in highschool now -we dont need mommies watching our every move and telling us whether or not weve had too much junk food.

    i also agree that the food in the vending machine is what keeps us awake during classes. with the ungodly amounts of homework and test we have to do/study for each night its a miracle that we even make it through the school doors without passing out and falling asleep. we need the sugar. also, i have a health problem ( low blood sugar) that makes me shake . the doctor says when i start shaking that im to eat something sugary. if they take away the vending machines where am i going to find that sugary goodness!?
  • activist on December 17, 2003
    In response to Responsible Individual,

    I agree with your sentiment against the abuses of multinational corporations and with the principle that our government should be spending more on books and less on bombs, but ultimately I stand by the decision from the Blair administration's perspective.

    Assuming they're doing all they can to get funding, which I believe, their actions come down to deciding between two outcomes: one in which there are more resources and they have made it easier for students to choose to eat unhealthily; and another in which there are fewer computers or the athletic fee is higher, placing the burden disproportionately on those who cannot afford it.

    Keep in mind that people choose to purchase food from vending machines, and that Blair makes not one bit of difference to Pepsi, which would continue to succeed without our business.

    When the day comes that every Blair student can read, every student graduates and every student who wants to goes on to college, I'll be standing with you against the corporate contracts. But for now, the best we can do is accept their money and lobby for more from the government that should but does not fund us sufficiently.
  • Me Want Coookie! on December 17, 2003
    And besides, it doesn't matter that they shut down the machines during the school day. People could just buy them afterschool, makes no difference. That ain't gonna stop people from getting fat, if you peeps really think that junk food CAN make you fat.
  • Anonymous on December 17, 2003
    I have eaten the Blair-vending-machine food in question. I do not have a health problem from this. Of course, if I ate too much of this food (dining on two bags of potato chips for lunch everyday, for example) I might have a health problem. It would be better if the amount of food of each type I can buy is restricted, than if the food was banned.

    The BOE should respect the students' culture, and the fact that many choose to eat at lunch time instead of after school. In some cultures there is no meal, but only smaller amounts of food, between lunch and the evening meal. Selling the food only "after school" away from traditional meal time, and also after many students must leave on the bus, could be a problem.

    Right now I have more health problems from working late on homework than from eating bad food. Where is the BOE homework restriction resolution? (I have not felt the effects of one yet.)

    What if the Blair soda-at-lunch revenue (currently none) is restored and used to pay for cleaner restrooms and to discourage students from littering? That would be _VERY_ healthy.
  • food junkie on December 17, 2003
    not cooool people... i wnder jwht scool weast was talking about who wasn't losing money... poolesville?? witman.. not blair...?
  • dr pepper on December 18, 2003
    and the french fried, nuggets, and nachos they feed us at lunch are much more healthier. . . right?
  • Fellow Blazer on December 18, 2003
    This is one of the stupidest things that has ever happened at MBHS next to banning freak dancing and not letting divas perform at pep rallies! I think we gotta do something about this because this is really stupid!!!
  • Mr. Special on December 18, 2003
    This is bad. Vending machines are very useful to get a bite to eat if you didn't eat breakfast and don't have enough to buy a lunch. Now, I'll starve. :-(
  • ! on December 18, 2003
    MAN dont turn off the vending machines!! forst of all if ppl get fat, the let them get fat i mean its their problem not ours and the school is losing lots of money!!~ wut bout those who arent fat and want to get something to eat from vending machines?? the lunch line is also pretty long!!
  • moonstone on December 18, 2003
    ...riot
  • weezer (View Email) on December 18, 2003
    Healthgirl: Liz: it's POTOMAC. YOU LIVE IN THIS COUNTY.

    Um...why is this girl calling other people ignorant and doesn't even know that Potomac is in Montgomery County? And what difference would it make anyway?

    I have to say that there really do need to be healthier foods in the vending machines. That doesn't mean take the other stuff out, but it is hard to find fast, easy, relatively healthy food at blair. But - if parents want their kids to eat healthier foods, they need to teach their kids to eat healthier foods. You can't ask a school to teach your child what to eat.

    Plus - these people are such hypocrites! We do see fat security guards, fat board members, fat adults all over the place, and nobody's restricting what they eat. Teenagers have to make a choice as to what they're gonna eat - it's our right - and if we had good role models our whatever, then hopefully we would learn the right thing.
  • Diddly on December 18, 2003
    I dont think it is a matter of your weight. The fact that all these comments go back to that issue is sad because it shows that all America cares about is your outward appearance. Personally I do occasionally use the vending machines if I feel so inclined but the fact of the matter is I don't really care if they are on or off because there are a lot better things to worry about in life then where your junk food intake is coming from. Have any of you seen the 7 11 across the street? yea news flash they have candy too who cares. If you need to catch a bus then just save your money and go home and start all that homework! Blair should use all its money it gets from Id's as a revenue.
  • Charmander (View Email) on December 18, 2003
    this school is starting to feel like prison.
  • ...me on December 18, 2003
    Ok I may not go to Blair this year which sucks. But truthfully Blair is gonna lose alot of money from not having the vending machines on during school. Alone last year I know I spent pobably alot more than 100 dollars I was always at the vending machines. But if we want to eat unhealthy foods thats on us. Whether or not the school thinks we need food like honey buns or cookies or whatever it doesnt matter we'll find other ways to get food. The school will lose the money. Usually you go to the vending machines between classes and eat on your way to class. Its not that big of a problem in classes for eating. Thats a really small problem. I think that if you want to keep making so much money off of vending machines then you should keep them on during the day. If you keep them off until after school then no one will ever buy anything.
  • Christian Brown (View Email) on December 18, 2003
    I see. People are fat so we don't leave them a choice. That's what I call a solution. I mean, the fact that not all people are equally affected by junk food - that's irrelevant, right? Sure, some people may not get fat - but they don't count. The fact that it removes the ability to choose a healthy eating style for yourself, well, hey, the Board of Education *must* know better than me. They're a Board! Of *Education*! It's not like they're into politicizing and making decisions because of how they sound, not what they do. The fact that the school loses money, well, hey, it's not like Blair has financial issues or anything. No, none at all.
  • Jackie H on December 18, 2003
    Blocking off the vending machines is just stupid. Okay, they block off the soda machines (well, most of them). So what? The point is, not only does Blair have a contract with Pepsi so that they can raise money, Blair is also looking out for the students when it comes to vending machine snacks. The food from, oh let's say, the cafeteria, is much more fatty than are those in the machines. If you want to be healthy, then don't buy the snacks in the machines and bring your own friggin' carrots and celery to school and eat those instead. No one has a right to say "hey you're unhealthy. Stop that." It's the consumer's decision, not yours. And you know what 'Responsible Individual? Go away. Saying things like "...raise our fists..." is a surefire way to get even more of our already abused privileges afforded to us as students taken away. And also, 'healthygirl', get over it. If people are overweight, it isn't necessarily fat, you moron. It can be that they are exercising and that their fat is turning into muscle, which by the way, weighs EVEN more than fat. Fat is genetic in some lines, such as hyperthyroid as someone else has previously mentioned. You're an ignorant person and you need to be put down. Do some research, fool, then come back and say something substantive. Besides, fat people don't die as fast as skinny people in the cold weather. By the way, Elliot, I agree.
  • Varun Gulati on December 18, 2003
    I wholeheartedly agree that we as teenagers are responsible enough to make our own decisions. Sure, the BOE may control some things from what we learn to which classrom we learn in, but to restrict what we want to feed ourselves with...thats monarchy.
  • personperson on December 18, 2003
    hey, how about schools just get enough funding so they don't need to have stupid contracts with multi-million (billion?) dollar corporations. some people are getting rich bc of a conctract in our PUBLIC school. meanwhile there are people at blair who can't afford to go to college.
  • sarah on December 18, 2003
    i think maybe we could compromise and have like healthy good also in the machines?

    i think you can be a little nicer in your comments. i'm sure they didn't stop the machines cuz ppl got fat. seriously, guys.
  • Lauren (View Email) on December 18, 2003
    Why did they have to make it sound like Blair is losing so much on behalf of the health of the students. I didn't feel like reading more to see if they're supplementing the loss of one staple of food with an increase in normal lunch. And will they be cutting down on junk food you can buy a la carte?
  • Former Blazer (View Email) on December 18, 2003
    Blazer3D :: 12/17/2003
    obesity being genetic is just something fat people say to make an excuse for them being lazy and eating too much

    This just shows how ignorant, hateful, and prejudice people can be, not to mention close-minded. I went to Blair, and the 'opinion' enpressed in this comment just goes to show why I felt so uncomfortable at school, and makes me feel confident in the decision I made to leave. I hope for your sake that you don't end up having a child who has a metabolic disorder or is predispositioned to be obese so that they don't have to suffer the social ramifications of being fat, and so you, as their parent don't have to hurt for your child, or, worse, show prejudice and ignorance to them and make them hate themselves. I wish that you could walk a day in my shoes so that you knew exactly what it was like to be obese...then maybe it wouldn't be so black and white, and maybe you wouldn't be so ignorant and gain some understanding.
  • shoogaplum (View Email) on December 19, 2003
    The school should just put healthier choices in the vending machines, that way the students can still choose their food, they have the same amount of choices, but are less likely to eat something extremely bad. Also, then the school can keep the vending machines open all day. Helloo??? Simple solution people.
  • Moo on December 19, 2003
    I think 99% of the food in the vending machines are a hell of a lot healthier than what the school cafiteria sells and makes
  • We Taught It (View Email) on December 22, 2003
    I think the blame should go towards Mr.Gainous. They just want to steal our money, it's rigged.
  • Betsy Haibel on December 22, 2003
    I think it's entirely reasonable to put healthier food in the vending machines. For about three weeks in freshman year, before transferring to Blair, I went to this girls' Catholic school; instead of a lunch line, there was this set of refrigerated vending machines that sold cup'o'noodles and Hot Pockets and salads, stuff like that. (The school also kept a few microwaves for frozen stuff.) Wouldn't adding one or two of those make everything a bit better? Admittedly, though, the profit margin to Blair wouldn't be as large.
  • alum on December 22, 2003
    I graduated back in 96, but I have to agree with the majority here: The BOE is making choices for you. As teenagers who will soon be either getting jobs or going off to college (where NO ONE can or cares to monitor what you eat or drink), you need to learn to make your own choices. Making bad ones are part of life and if you're denied that opportunity at an early age, you'll just make them later on. It's a shame that they're sheltering you all like this.
  • mollie on December 22, 2003
    has anyone said anything about the lack of VEGETARIAN and VEGAN options in schools? no. only that they are losing their precious candy bars. hey blazers, breathe. its not that big of a deal. maybe we should figure out how to cater to everyone before we start crying over skittles and coke. just a suggestion.....
  • cyrstal on December 22, 2003
    moo- i can't agree with you more buddy! don't forget the junk that the school store sells
  • schmalachy101 on December 22, 2003
    you don't get fat just from eating out of vending machines people. they are a crutial thing to blair so people can eat for lunch because of the over crowdednesssssssssss.
  • Le Cow on December 23, 2003
    Moo
  • Carly on December 23, 2003
    How can you expect us to want te eat at the cafetira anyways. Most people need the vending machines so they actually have food to eat. And the school store has unhealthy food but they are not closing that down. I dont think that mcps should be interfeering with what we eat, its our choice. Anyways if people cant get food at the vending machines more than likely we'll have more people eating at McDonalds and 711. No ones mention how unhealthy they are, and can u imagine what will happen when you start eating at McDonalds every day.
  • Healthyguy on December 23, 2003
    Healthygirl, you may not want to pay for someone's healthcare when you get diabetes, but I don't want to pay your unemployment when you can't get a job because your education in high school wasn't good enough. This school exists to provide an education, and they should do such to the best of their abilities, if that includes letting people make their own decisions about what to eat, I'm all for it.
  • me on December 23, 2003
    Responsible indivual: "When our schools cannot adequately be funded because our government spends more on funding occupations and militarizations, we can take action."
    This is Bush's fault? This is a new one. The defense budget is not related to the educational one. But, on another note, the BOE has no right to restrict what choices students make. If they are going to give students the responsibilities they do, they have to give them privleges too.
  • S.J.G. on December 23, 2003
    The Board of Education has no right to tell us what is or isn't "good" for us. A lot of the time I only have enough money for the food in the vending machines. I would much rather eat junk than not eat at all.

    If the Board really want to solve the so-called health problem, maybe they could try putting healthy food in the machines. Of course, there's still a 7-11 across the street...
  • Stupid Americans on December 25, 2003
    What the hell?! This is the dumbest thing I've ever heard... No, wait Bush choking on a pretzel was, but still.
    Obesity is more genetic than anything, eating a bag of Cheetos isn't going to make me 50lbs over weight. We're not learning to make better nutritional choices by them hiding all the things deemed "of little nutritional value."

    Blair has already been losing a lot of money for the past few years and now angry parents of obese kids want to aggravate the situation. We've got classes with 28 students and people are freaking petitioning because they're kids are obese and the school is selling candy bars. Give me a break!

    Turning off the machines or limiting what's there all you're doing is censoring kids, and when we get out to the "real world" they're aren't going to be people to pick out for you what's healthy and what isn't. Isn't it better for us just to learn for ourselves?!

    Ugh, another reminder of why I've given up on the human race.
  • SV Student on December 25, 2003
    I personally feel that this is a dumb idea. I mean, I can understand that maybe filling the vending machines with more healthy choices could be wise, but why close the machines all day? It is a ridiculous idea, some people, including myself, do not have time to stand in long lunch lines to recive food, and packing food from home is near impossible. Vending machines are convient for a student who needs to see a teacher or club for lunch, that way they have time to eat, without the inconvience of getting food all over there work. Closing vending machines till the end of the day is pointless, besides, what about the students who need a certian amount of sugar in the system, or the student that needs an extra boost to keep up with the day?? Closing vending machines all day is just wrong!
  • Unknown (View Email) on December 28, 2003
    THIS IS COMPLETELY OUTRAGEOUS. WHAT WILL I EAT DURIGN MY AFTER SCHOOL ACTIVITIES? THE BOARD SUCKS
  • P. DiDdY (View Email) on December 28, 2003
    Yo this yo boy P. DiDdY,

    Gyea, ya'll machines should be kept up cause ya know ya be having some hunger for snacks. That's cool tho cuz I be having my drinks and snacks in my Rolls Royce. Holla. Come holla at my clothing line.

  • Anonymous on December 30, 2003
    despite my reservations about a public school signing a contract with a major corporation and the exploitative practices of pepsi (yeah, yeah, kids can choose, but they're making things that are really bad for you really appealling to young kids long before high school), it's interesting that the BOE has nothing to say about the state of cafeteria food, which is only marginally better than a snickers bar. if the BOE wants to take comprehensive action towards improved student health, that's fine; but it should be comprehensive, not selective and ill-aimed. in dealing with the vending machines only, the BOE seems to be making more of a publicity stunt than a concerted effort towards improving student health.
  • Sexy TeeTee (View Email) on December 31, 2003
    I think that we should keep the machines because @ lunch for some kids who don't have money for school lunch they can always get something from the machines. And after school when kids are hungry they can go to the machines to get a snack if they wanted to. Since we are not aloud to leave the school grounds during lunch, the vending machines may have what ever we wanted from a store for example Chips,Candy,etc. Not having vending machines is a VERY dumb idea.
  • blair grad on January 3, 2004
    i actually don't think this measure is going far enough to curb unhealthy eating habits. what about when students and faculty are not on school premises? should we allow them to consume high calorie and fatty foods before and after school? i believe everyone who attends/ works at mbhs should keep a journal of their eating habits, complete with all nutritional information. these journals should be submitted to the BOE for review, and violators of healthy eating should be punished. it only feels right.
  • Senior on January 5, 2004
    so if they want to cut back, is this why they added the ice cream and milk machines? Man, people are becoming lazy, just make a snadwich, it's not that difficult!
  • hypocrisy? on January 5, 2004
    Doesn't it seem just a tad bit strange that the BOE has it in mind to restrict vending machines for their lack of nutritional value, yet they install ice cream machines over break? If the BOE and Weast want to be taken seriously, they need to start making some serious and smart choices.
  • Lisa on January 5, 2004
    So school is back up and the vending machines are not only still on, but we now have a ice cream machine. I'm sorry, but I was under the impression that the purpose of the restrictions on the vending machines was about health. So the school is telling us that we're too fat and then they add an ice cream machine. Good job Blair.
  • Junior (View Email) on January 6, 2004
    i think vending machines should stay there.
    if vending machines are not there i think that many students will bring things in the class rooms, everyday in the morning.
    at that time the will eat or drink in the class rooms any time.and also some might even be stilling money from their parents and buy snacksor drink to put in their lockers.
  • big mama (View Email) on January 7, 2004
    i don't see what;s the point half of machinesdo not work for example the soda machince next to the school storeand that;s alot of money that you can be making
  • ic on January 8, 2004
    The icecream machine was added as a healthy alternative to vending machines. This is the first time I have ever heard of ice cream as something healthy.
  • airhead on January 8, 2004
    Without the vending machines the school would get poorer. And the stundents will fight back!!!!
  • twixman on January 8, 2004
    what...? no more twix. theirs no point in living anymore.
  • Nikki (View Email) on January 9, 2004
    LET US KEEP THE SODA MACHINES BECAUSE THE RULE AND YOU SUCK!
  • nece (View Email) on February 16, 2004
    how do you expect some students to eat cafiteria food when there food is no good thank you thats all i have to say about that and some students dont care what they eat like this girl chelsey i know she will eat anything that she can find or see so thats all i have to say.
  • hawaiianjess (View Email) on April 7, 2004
    You know what? I may not go to your school but banning the vending machines is just down right stupid.Think about it..people can just bring something from home and its the same thing..ya'll will just be losing your money...boo-hoo you made happen. people also react differently to foods. you can eat a bag of chips and drink a coke and you wont always get fat. just remember to exercise too.Schools dont have the right to have students eat a certain food. focus on teaching and not on eating.
  • big island chick on January 26, 2005 at 2:42 PM
    I think they should keep school vending machines in school because here in hawaii all the kids would say that they like keep vending machines here and the kids at Hilo intermediate school which I go to love the vending machines at our school.
  • Lily on February 11, 2005 at 1:16 PM
    well they should keep the vending machines but with HEALTHY FOOD IN IT!!
  • I love Marvin (View Email) on December 6, 2005 at 2:15 PM
    I LOVE SODA AND MARVIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  • queen on February 10, 2006 at 2:56 PM
    you guys all sound fat. i think you need healthy foods
  • april (View Email) on March 6, 2006 at 1:51 PM
    i am doin a report on Vending machines good or bad at school i would love all the info u can send me
  • Kelvin (View Email) on March 10, 2006 at 12:55 PM
    Hi,

    I am trying to implement similar system into a middile school. Please send me some info.
Jump to first comment