Tuesday, February 9, 2010 9:01 am
Montgomery Blair High School's Online Student Newspaper
Tags: print
Dec. 18, 2003

State and county math standards hurt student performance

by Elliott Wolf, Page Editor
Changes in the Algebra I curriculum brought about by the new Maryland High School Assessment Tests (HSAs) and a push by MCPS to have more middle-school students take algebra have caused many students to be seriously unprepared for higher-level math, according to numerous Blair teachers and administrators.

The Algebra HSA was first instituted by the Maryland State Department of Education (MSDE) four years ago. Since then, it has been widely criticized for its content. "The HSA takes the algebra out of algebra," said University of Maryland Associate Professor of Mathematics Jerome Dancis.

Shortly before the introduction of the HSA, MCPS mandated changes to the Algebra I curriculum to align the course with the tested material. However, the new curriculum has attracted a great deal of criticism. "We don’t think the material is what they need to know to be successful," said Blair algebra lead teacher Maria Costello.

Changes in the curriculum are cited as a main cause for students’ deficiencies in basic algebra, which are manifesting themselves in higher-level math courses that require an understanding of concepts taught in Algebra I. "Our Algebra II students are worse than ever. Our Pre-Calculus students are worse than ever. It’s falling apart as we go up the ladder," said Costello.

Concerned about her students’ performance, Pre-Calculus teacher Julie Greenberg asked her colleagues via e-mail about the competency of their current students. Forty teachers responded, 29 of whom indicated that their students were "less competent" than those of their earliest teaching experience. The majority of those 29 cited basic algebra skills as the root of their students’ deficiencies.

The problem is not limited to the non-magnet Blair population; magnet coordinator Eileen Steinkraus is worried about the mathematics preparation of many of the current magnet freshmen. "This issue was a concern last year. We thought it was just an anomaly, but that doesn’t appear to be the case," said Steinkraus. The freshmen "are not as well prepared…their skills in algebra are weaker," said magnet Pre-Calculus teacher Judith Bishop.

According to Steinkraus, students from the Takoma Park Middle School Math, Science and Computer Science Magnet Program, which does not follow the mandated MCPS Algebra I curriculum, are largely unaffected.

The new MCPS algebra curriculum

One of the main complaints about the new MCPS algebra curriculum is the emphasis on data analysis, a topic that was not included in Algebra I until the introduction of the HSA. Costello considers data analysis to be displacing some of the algebra topics that used to be covered. "The new Algebra I curriculum consists of 45 percent data analysis," said Costello. Fourteen of the teachers who responded to Greenberg "explicitly criticized" the algebra curriculum’s emphasis on data analysis.

Data analysis represents one of the seven Algebra I units, and that unit takes less time than most of the other units, said MCPS Mathematics Instructional Specialist Lauren Duff. However, MCPS documentation for the Algebra I curriculum recommends spending six weeks on the "Data Analysis and Probability" unit, more time than on any of the remaining six units in the curriculum.

The inclusion of data analysis in the Algebra HSA grew out of the desire for students to master objectives in algebra, geometry and data analysis, said Maryland State Department of Education (MSDE) mathematics specialist Donna Watts. MSDE only requires two credits of high school mathematics for graduation, and those topics had to be combined into two tests. According to Watts, data analysis was wed to algebra to form the current HSA.

As a result of the curriculum changes, the Magnet has restructured the pre-calculus curriculum to allow for review of more basic algebra concepts, something that non-magnet teachers are not permitted to do under current MCPS regulations.

"The HSA is our first priority"

While the MCPS algebra curriculum is centered around the objectives of the HSA, according to Watts, those objectives represent only fundamental competency levels. "The core learning goals [for algebra and data analysis] do not represent all of algebra. It only represents about 60% of a typical Algebra I course. It’s up to the local school system to decide what to add," said Watts.

Although MCPS teaches additional material on top of the core requirements of the HSA, "the HSA is our first priority," said Duff.

Montgomery County Gifted and Talented Association president John Hoven considers the HSA to be the main focus of Weast’s mathematics initiatives. "What Weast cares about is that Montgomery County students pass the test in large numbers, so he rewrote the entire [algebra] curriculum to be as close to the Maryland standards as possible," said Hoven.

Coupled with the increased MCPS emphasis on the goals of the HSA, many teachers feel that since they are evaluated based on the HSA scores of their students, they must spend even more time covering and reviewing the material in preparation for the test.

"[It’s a] number game…It’s all because of the numbers," said Math Department Chairman Barbara Hoffman.

Taking algebra too early

Coupled with changes in the algebra curriculum, many teachers see MCPS initiatives to push more middle-school students into taking algebra as contributing to the decline in student performance.

Eighteen of the 40 teachers who responded to Greenberg also said that many of their Honors students were pushed into algebra before they were either ready to absorb the material or mature enough to handle the workload. Bishop also attributes much of her magnet students’ deficiencies to being pushed into algebra too early.

In 1996, 32.8 percent of students completed algebra by the end of their eighth-grade year. That percentage rose to 51.4 percent in 2003. The percentage of students completing algebra by their seventh-grade year rose from 2.3 percent to 12.3 percent during the same time period.

"The superintendent wants more students in Algebra and Geometry in middle school… and kids who are ready to take algebra should take algebra." said Hoffman.

"But it’s definitely not half of all students," said Costello.

How should math be taught?

Many believe that this problem is not only limited to Algebra I and other courses with HSA requirements, but that it is a symptom of a larger movement in math instruction that spans K-12.

According to Hoven and Dancis, math curriculum and instruction have been factionalized into two sides of a "math war." One side is represented by the National Counsel of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM), who, according to Hoven, "wants to emphasize geometry vocabulary and fake data analysis." The other side, according to Dancis, is represented by people like Hoven and magnet Calculus teacher Eric Walstein, who advocate for teaching methods that promote a deep understanding of material. According to Hoven, MCPS has "enthusiastically" embraced NCTM’s goals.

Walstein believes that this new instruction is preventing students from learning fundamental math concepts which are needed to understand higher level material. "The kids are not learning the foundations of the material. They’re just sitting and memorizing formulas, and they don’t have any idea what it means," said Walstein. "It all relates to one word…intuition. The kids just memorize, and they can’t intuit anything."

"The things that should come out of their heads automatically are just not there," agreed Costello.

Walstein cited the increased use of calculators in MCPS curriculum as an example of this problem. "If students can just punch things into a calculator, and it spits out the answer, that’s not math. They’re not learning anything," said Walstein. While Walstein believes that calculators should be used in certain circumstances, they are not a substitute for understanding the material.

"It’s a lot easier to teach someone to use a calculator," said Walstein. "But that doesn’t mean they’re being taught math," he added.

Whose responsibility is it?

The 2001 No Child Left Behind Act provides for the removal of school administrators if students’ test scores fail to meet federal standards. MCPS also evaluates teachers based on their students’ performance on the HSAs. If students don’t perform well, "it’s the teacher’s fault," joked statistics teacher Karen Klarman.

However, according to Walstein, the role of the student in math instruction should be emphasized as well. One thing that Walstein often tells his magnet students it that "You learn, I help." Walstein believes that while the teacher should cover and explain the material, it is the students’ responsibility to spend time practicing it and studying.

Despite the fact that the current curriculum, state policies, MCPS policies and federal place all of the responsibility on teachers, Walstein believes that the students are the ones who are ultimately suffering. "The kids are the victims here," said Walstein.

Discuss this Article

  • Abhi on December 18, 2003
    Way to go Elliott!
  • Zach on December 19, 2003
    MCPS mandated changes to the Algebra I curriculum to align the course with the tested material. - from article

    Why not change the tests instead. Aren't tests supposed to measure what you learned. Not to teach what's on the test? just another stupid policy brought to you by MCPS.
  • MCPSisGarbage on December 22, 2003
    MCPS is absolute trash. I should move to a different county.
  • ron mcclain (View Email) on December 23, 2003
    This is another good example of dumbing down the curriculum to focus on standardized tests.

    I grew up in New York state where in some classes we would spend the last 10 weeks of the year reviewing the previous year's state regents exams, and that in itself was enough to produce good grades on the test, even if nothing had been taught previously. On the other hand we had excellent algebra instruction, far beyond what the exam required, so that we did almost no additional prep for that test.

    There are students ready to take algebra in sixth grade and others who will struggle with it in 10th. There is no advantage to pressuring kids to take it earlier.

    The movement toward state testing and the nclb initiatives reflect our best efforts to buy something better cheaply. (which isn't to say these tests don't cost a lot of money--but smaller classes, or courses with good texts available apparently would cost more).

    Good work, Elliot.
  • Fran Rothstein (View Email) on December 23, 2003
    Elliott's done us all a public service, but only if students, their families and teachers, and anyone who cares about a mathematically literate public takes action. The Montgomery County Board of Education is YOUR Board; members of the State Board of Education are yours as well. Send Elliott's article to them, and ask for their response. Elected officials react to public comment (duh).

    Just consider this a little civics homework for the winter break. Merry Christmas, Happy Chanukah, Joyous Kwanzaa to all.
  • Carolyn (View Email) on December 23, 2003
    This is an excellent article, which explains to me what parents on the listserve have been complaining about for a while. It has been obvious there is a problem, and I am happy to finally understand what the specifics are... Thank you, Elliott
  • S on December 24, 2003
    Hofman says some people are ready to take Algebra I in middle school, but not half of all students.. why not? Why does it take eight full years in such a high ranking school system to learn how to add and multiply with negative signs? Students are suffering because they receive inadequate elementary school math instruction, not because eighth grade is too early for most people to learn algebra.
  • Lonnie E. Weck (View Email) on December 29, 2003
    Could not agree more with your article. I am located in the state of Georgia, and we are just now starting the endeavor Maryland is currently going through. I have been teaching for 14 years as a mathematics teacher. I have taught high school for 13 years (teaching general math to AP Calculus). The comments about the Algebra II students being worse than ever, coupled with the "dummying down the curriculum" so more students can pass, has led to lower scores in mathematics on the standardized tests. Regarding calculators, it is the old "GIGO" (garbage in garbage out) theory. If the students does not know the basics in algebra, they are only parroting the teacher in the execution of calculator functions. As a trigonometry teacher, I was chastised for not introducing calculators earlier in the curriculum. My intent was reteach the algebra the students did not learn prior to taking trig. The state of Georgia's exam in Algebra will be without calculators. So what was the principal accomplishing with his pushing the calculators into the classroom early. As Zach wrote, "just another studid policy..." only this time brought to you by administration. I have left the high school to teach the "Gifted Math" program at a middle school. I am hoping that here I can make a difference with this students. The problem I am now experiencing is the parents not wanting the practice and repition to take place in the math arena, homework every other night, and no homework on the weekends. How do they expect the students to learn if the foundations are now learned and practiced. We went through Block Scheduling the same way (another administrative disaster). Now we are repeating history with the forcing of Algebra being introducted too early into the student's mathematical development. Some students just do not get the concepts in the middle schools. The Algebra issue should not be forced, but planned for those students who have the capability to learn the curriculum and develope their Algebra skills at that early level. We need to let the educators educate and the heirachy leave things alone.
  • Sue Allison (View Email) on December 29, 2003
    This is an outstanding article! I found it referenced on the site Susan Ohanian site -- www.susanohanian.org . Susan is hands down the best writer on education I know -- it is quite a compliment to be featured on her site. Congratulations on some outstanding reporting. Why can't journalists at the Post and the Sun do the same kind of in-depth analysis of the HSA issue? Jerry Dancis, the U of M professor quoted in the article has become a great friend. He is relentless in his goal to expose the lack of substance in the Algebra exam, just as I am equally determined to stop any of the HSA's from becoming make or break graduation requirements. Jerry and I can agree on one thing -- One size fits all education reform solutions fit few. The last place I saw Jerry was at the last State Board of Education meeting, where the board completely disregarded statements and testimony from the Maryland Association of Boards of Education, the PTA, Advocates for Children and Youth, the Maryland State Teachers Association, and many other groups and individuals when the voted to allow the MSDE to draft regulations to make the the HSA's make or break graduation requirements, and to set up a bizarre six tiered diploma system. The State Board is doing anything BUT living up to their lofty "Voice of the people" motto. It's time to take the case back to the Maryland General Assembly. I hope that parents, students and administrators from Montgomery county will rally around the reprise of MD House Bill 1166-03, which would prohibit the State Board from requiring passage of any test or series of tests as a graduation requirement. This bill was sponsored last year by the courageous Del. George Owings, Calvert County. You can read about the bill on our website. Please visit our site to learn all about the damage and heartbreak high stakes testing has caused in other states, like Massachusetts, where 4,000 diplomas were lost last spring, and Florida, where an economic boycott was launched because 10,000 diplomas were lost to the Florida FCAT. Visit our site at www.geocities.com/stophsa -- and please keep up the great work (click on our online petition link at the top of our homepage, and please add your name to the growing list of MD citizens fed up with hollow testing solutions). Silver Chips -- You are truly setting the standards for journalism with regard to MD education!

    Warmest Regards, Sue Allison, Coordinator, Marylanders Against High Stakes Testing.
  • Dan (View Email) on December 30, 2003
    Enjoyed the article!

    The headline of your article is also the answer to the math testing issue; "State and County math standards..."

    To help understand this falacy, and many other education "standards" issues, take a wonderful trip into "Full House," the book by Stephen Jay Gould, a professor of zoology and geology at Harvard (died last year).

    He shakes the trees of "standards" from their roots. Thus, of course, he has lots of "enemies," too.
  • Betty Peters (View Email) on December 30, 2003
    I appreciate the information in this article about the "math wars" in Maryland. It is especially of interest to me because a large portion of my state school board district is embarking on a new National Science Foundation-funded teacher education program. I have been informed that many Alabama teachers will learn new techniques modeled after what is being taught in the Baltmore schools. I am, naturally, concerned that we copy only what actually works elsewhere as we attempt to improve the education of the students in Ala. I will be sharing this article with as many of our teachers and parents as I can so that we will, hopefully, make the best decisions.

    Betty Peters, Member, Alabama State Board of Education
  • Kimberly (View Email) on January 12, 2004
    It's interesting to see the range of comments on here, and I'm glad to have found this site. However, I fail to follow the logical argument, "Bad standards produce bad tests, and students do worse on bad tests, so let's get rid of high-stakes testing."

    The standards are the problem here, not the tests. When standards are bad, high-stakes testing will not help improve education. When standards are good, testing *can* help.
  • % on January 13, 2004
    Oh no! 10% of our students are below 10th percentile!

    What are we comparing the students against except each other. This is stupid!
  • denny (View Email) on May 23, 2005 at 9:22 PM
    I am taking algebra right now and its not very difficult because iam 17 years old! We should learn harder stuff.
Leave a Comment