Saturday, February 11, 2012 3:54 pm
Montgomery Blair High School's Online Student Newspaper
Tags: print
April 29, 2004

Sanghvi wins SMOB election

by Branden Buehler, Page Editor and KC Costanzo, Page Editor
Incumbent Sagar Sanghvi was reelected as Student Member of the Board (SMOB) for the 2004-2005 school year, beating Blair junior Amanda Lee.

According to an e-mail sent by MCPS Coordinator of Student Affairs Karen Crawford, Sanghvi, a junior at Colonel Zadok Magruder High School in Rockville, won with 58.21 percent of the vote. All high schools and middle schools in the county participated in the election with a voter turnout of 83.2 percent.

In order to get nominated for SMOB, Lee had to overcome the difficulty of missing 19 votes from Blair delegates after the SGA missed an application deadline. Lee finished with 41.79 percent of the vote in a race much closer than last year's. "I'm proud of how I did," she said. "I'm told it was one of the closer elections in SMOB history."

Lee felt Sangvhi benefited from his status as the incumbent because his position came along with "face and name recognition." In order to stay competitive in the race, Lee said she visited schools and distributed a promotional video. "I think the fact that I did campaign actively helped make up for Sagar's advantage as the incumbent," she said.

Lee was not sure what role, if any, she will have in student government in the future, but said she "would like to stay involved. This experience was a really good one for me. My interest in education policy has only become more intense."

During Sanghvi’s first year in office, his activities included helping to set up the Student Advisory Committee, voting against shutting down vending machines in schools and campaigning against the proposed new grading policy.

"I know that [Sanghvi will] do a good job next year," Lee said. "I hope that this election has helped him get a better sense of things that he could focus on next year."

More information to come.

Discuss this Article

  • disappointed on April 29, 2004
    too bad. i really think amanda would have been a great SMOB...and i think she had better view points on a lot of the issues, even though both candidates shared the same views on a lot of issues...still, his idea about start times and having two seperate ones is really [awful].
  • RedskinsFan on April 29, 2004
    boo sagar!
  • conspirator on April 29, 2004
    Go Amanda!
  • man on April 29, 2004
    i didnt even get to vote. i was sick. amanda shoulda won.
  • Mr. Grossman (View Email) on April 29, 2004
    I wonder how many votes Sangar won by appealing directly to the lowest common denominator instincts of voters?

    His campaign distinguished itself by focusing on four issues: the creation of the Student Advisory Committee, cell phones for middle school students, the rights of students to have access to junk food via vending machines and opposition to the new grading policy.

    Those issues represent neither a bold, nor dynamic vision for the County's schools or the role of the SMOB. It would have been nice to hear more about issues such as recycling in the school system, better communication between students, teachers and administrators, a way to address the 'achievement gap' and the vital role students can play in our commuity as volunteers.

    I do not belive middle school access to cell phones or student access to junk food will create a better public school environment.

    It saddens me to see student leaders side step ideals and appeal directly to the self-interest of voters.
  • . on April 29, 2004
    Wow, 58-42 is extremely close for a SMOB election. For the past few years there really haven't even been races, everyone knew who was going to win from the start. But even if she didn't win, she ran a great campaign that probably will affect how future candidates run theirs.
  • Jackie H on April 29, 2004
    Amanda ran a great campaign. Though she lost, she is still the new SMOB in my heart. Go Amanda!
  • Samir Paul (View Email) on April 29, 2004
    I hope that Amanda will take a leadership role in MCR.
  • =( on April 29, 2004
    aww..i really wanted amanda to win! sagar got his chance this year..so now i thought it was definitely time for him to step down..plus we really needed somebody from Blair there!!! but still amanda, you did awesome!!!
  • hey on May 1, 2004
    i cudnt vote either
  • ? on May 2, 2004
    I never got a chance to vote. Why??
  • Jessica Yen (View Email) on May 2, 2004
    You should have been called down to vote through your English class.
  • Tami on May 3, 2004
    I was one of the few people who voted for Sagar. Though he didn't have a very distinguishing campaign, I didn't think Amanda stood out in any way either. She didn't have any bold new ideas; like many pointed out, she and Sagar seemed to be rather similar. I thought Sagar came off as the more polished of the two candidates. He was more articulate and just carried a better image. I think that the fact that this is his second year will help him as well. Amanda worked hard and did a good job, but in the end, she didn't stand out enough.
  • Anonymous on May 3, 2004
    STOP SLANDERING THE SGA! you got a problem with em, talk to people. next time you want to report on what they are "not" doing, do some more research. You call yourself journalists.
  • 0.o (View Email) on May 4, 2004
    I wanted Amanda to win. Many people I know voted for Sagar because in the debate he sounded much more confident and answered quickly and clearly, so what? Think about it this way, you're debating and all the middle schools and high schools are watching, that's very nerve racking. Sagar did sound confident, but that doesn't mean anything. Last year he said he would od something about cell phones in middle school. I might not go to middle school, but I have friends who do, they see no change. So everyone who voted for Sagar, what makes you think he's going to do anything this year?!
  • BOZO on May 4, 2004
    Who ever voted for him your STUPID. He does nothing. Look at last year he won and didn't do anything.I would love to hear why people voted for him!!
  • ... on May 4, 2004
    The whole point of having a SMOB is to get fresh new student ideas across to the BOE. Sanghavi's re-election defeated the purpose of his job; as a second-year SMOB, he's familiar with the BOE's policy, and won't be as eager to press issues that students see as important, because he'll be used to what the Board thinks and how they react to such suggestions. He'll be more likely to support things that the Board will be inclined to agree with.


    The point of this election was to get a new voice into the BOE. Amanda Lee had good ideas, and was genuinely concerned with their implementation. Her campaign, unlike Sanghavi's, reflected no desperation for votes.

    Lee was the clear winner here, whether or not the corresponding numbers agree. Way to go, Amanda. And you have the consolation of knowing you're much prettier than Sagar, anyway.
  • Disappointed on May 4, 2004
    Incumbency is typically an advantage, however it can be the final nail in the coffin. Especially when the incumbent has failed to reach the large majority of the student population (I wasn't even told he won LAST year until I saw him running THIS year). He has also been given the chance to make an impact during his last term as SMOB. If he couldn't do it last year, what makes us think he can do it this year. Sure, vending machines are on? This is why I'm sitting here sans a bag of chips and a Pepsi right now. Yeah, I voted Lee. =)
  • chaos on May 5, 2004
    that suck!!!!!!!
  • hillbilly on May 6, 2004
    awww shucks! u shoulda won 'manda! gosh darnit!
  • someone on May 6, 2004
    amanda should have won!!!
  • Jeffrey Lautenberger on May 6, 2004
    "Especially when the incumbent has failed to reach the large majority of the student population (I wasn't even told he won LAST year until I saw him running THIS year)"

    so true...
  • moonstone on May 7, 2004
    immture brats...
  • Saul Kinter on May 7, 2004
    What has Sagar done for me lately?

    And how is 58-42 one of the closer elections in smob history!?!?!
  • Anarchist on May 7, 2004
    Amanda should have won!!! :( She's soo cute and cuddly anyway ^)^ ^_^

    Plus she has way better ideas than Saggykins. I'm shocked so many Blair students didn't vote for her.
  • S.J.G. on May 7, 2004
    it's good to know my vote counted...
  • blazer pride is not amanda on May 7, 2004
    We all know that the SMOB never really gets anything done. Why should the Board just listen to a kid; it's all in the name of politics anyway, and good PR to have a kid involved. However, that cynicism aside, it is important to note which candidate has had more experience, has more confidence, and portrays themselves more positively to their target audience. Sagar met all three of these criteria and already has a year of involvement under his belt. The fact that Amanda was amazingly repetitive, unfocused, and inexperienced makes her unfit for the job. It's not the job of the SMOB to actually change anything - because let's face it, that will never happen - but it is their job to advise the rest of the Board on certain matters. And, it seems like Sagar's got that under control. Props.
  • Varun Gulati on May 10, 2004
    I disagree with "blazer pride is not amanda"...one-ninth of a vote is more than you will ever get.
  • Sophomore on May 11, 2004
    the SMOB is definitely NOT about school pride; however Amanda is still the better candidate because at least we can hope for a change. None of the elected members (ever know to me) ever did what they promised so why not give Amanda a shot?
  • Andy Wang on May 11, 2004
    oh my god way too make too big a deal out of things. obviously more people voted for sagar over amanda because of the fact that more people supported sagar for amanda for whatever reasons they have. i do not attack you (yes, you) for having stupid ideas on political subjects (and i'm sure your ideas are stupid) so why do you feel like you have the right to attack anonymous voters who voted for their choice of candidate?
  • scenester on May 11, 2004
    ah shucks amanda should have been smob and made everyone emo with her all powerful emo glasses. man im going to go cry in the corner. someone hold me im alone
  • Actually on May 11, 2004
    Well, its all well and good that we have a SMOB. However, as people have pointed out the SMOB does nothing anyway. The SMOB has no real power, and the board has no obligation to take any of their views into account.

    As much as we don't want to believe it, we are only high schoolers and in some palces, we really don't know what's best for us. High school is still one of those times where we really have no clue what we should be learning and therefore, should have no real say on curriculum or bugetary concerns.

    While the SMOB is a good idea, in practice it would be a disaster just because good policies that would help our education would be jepordized by a SMOB who pushed the student's agenda, such as cell phone use in middle schools or a once again promised double A exemption. Really, why should the board deal with middle school cell phone use? Also why should double-A exemption occur? If these policies were good for the teaching environment, the board would implement them. We really don't need a SMOB "representing our views" when we can just write to the board anyway.
  • asdf on May 12, 2004
    this has been the top story for like a year now! aren't you supposed to be a newspaper?
  • Osama on May 12, 2004
    I'm proud of you son!
Jump to first comment