Thursday, May 24, 2012 9:07 am
Montgomery Blair High School's Online Student Newspaper
June 24, 2004

"Napoleon Dynamite": more amateur than explosive

by Emma Zachurski, Entertainment Editor
The own promotional tagline of "Napoleon Dynamite," "He's out to prove he's got nothing to prove," couldn't sum up the pointless, mindless, yet occasionally funny film any better.

In his full length directorial and screenwriting debut, Jared Hess takes a shot at an awkward teen comedy. Unfortunately for Hess and co-writer Jerusha Hess, this fore-mentioned genre has already been perfected by Todd Solondz' darker-spirited "Welcome to the Dollhouse" and Wes Anderson's "Rushmore." Unlike its impressive predecessors, "Napoleon Dynamite" lacks many significant features of a substantial film, including well accessed wit along with a developed storyline and plot.
Heder in "Napoleon Dynamite."
Heder in "Napoleon Dynamite."

The movie follows the daily misadventures of the lead character- a socially inept and quirky teenager (who ironically enough looks a good deal like the character Dudley of Wes Anderson's "The Royal Tenenbaums"), Napoleon Dynamite (Jon Heder). In his small typically barren Suburban town, Dynamite tries to find a girlfriend, makes friends with fellow loners Deb (Tina Majorino) and Pedro (Efren Ramirez),and deals with the shenanigans of his hopeless romantic internet dating addict brother, Kip (Aaron Ruell), sleazy dirtbag uncle, Rico (Jon Gries), and the family's needy pet llama.

Additionally, the writers throw in many random unexplained and never resolved events and situations. For one example, in an oddly amusing scene, Rico and Kip buy a time machine to travel back into 1982, but nothing of this eccentric behavior is clarified or even brought up after its brief featured segment. Combined with a lack of screenplay clarity, there is not even a suitable narration to carry the movie through, and the film only jumps from one conversation to another idiotically or slapstick styled comedy moment.

Because of the deprivation of elaboration of the various character stories entwined in the film, many of the scenes, near budding plot twists and developments are only left to fade into the movie's inconcise and blurry plotline background, along with its pattern of no direction. As well as damaging the tangibility of the movie's plot, the lack of material also causes the characters to seem more like talking pieces of props rather than people who have emotions, personalities and thoughts or even maybe, just maybe grow up and mature.

From all of the bland characters and lack of constructed screenplay development, "Napoleon Dynamite" runs similarly to a prolonged Saturday Night Live skit, humorous to an extent but ruined by a strong overtone of unnerving repetition of the same gags and immature dialogue comedy. Seeing Napoleon fall on his face, say "tight" and other slang words in his breathy monotonous voice, or attempt some dance moves will only sprout laughter so many times.

Despite how various déjà vu moments and obnoxious revisits on earlier parts of the film is used, the movie somehow finds a way to stay somewhat humorous even in the end (although not as much so as it is in the beginning), mainly thanks to Heder's performance as Napoleon, which stands out next to the rest of the cast's dull and cliched performances. Heder unlike the rest of the actors and actresses, at least almost finds a way to make Napoleon his own breed of a dejected,outcasted and cynically comedic loser.

Although it's no comedy in the ranks of the tops, or even a good film overall, "Napoleon Dynamite" does a few entertaining movements. Putting aside the prominent flaws of the film, it is almost possible to leave smiling from the theater. However, "Napoleon Dynamite" is not to be thought of more than a simple brain dead excuse to get a scarce number of giggles from the outrageous antics of adolescent and high school life in American suburbia.

"Napoleon Dynamite" is rated PG for thematic elements and language and is playing at Landmark Bethesda Rowe Cinema and CO DuPont Circle 5 Theaters.



Share on Tumblr

Discuss this Article

  • mollie on June 24, 2004
    congrats emma im proud of you....awesome writing. you dont beat me in romance writing tho hehe.
  • phil on August 20, 2004
    THANK YOU EMMA..... that movie was beyond bad

  • jake on September 9, 2004
    I'm not sure how old all of you are, but I'm 15 and from me and my friends point of view the movie was beyond hilarious. I think that theres more of a targeted audience for this film and that may be why your reactions are very different. This was a very cheap movie though, as it was a Searchlight film. But for an unknown person to write and produce it was a great first attempt.
  • Katie 05 on September 26, 2004
    This was the greatest movie EVER.
  • peaches on October 4, 2004
    don't you diss napoleon dynamite!!! best movie EVER!!! what the flip!!! GOSH.
  • LUCKY!!! on October 8, 2004
    This was pretty much my favorite movie of all time.

    It was beautiful.

    It inspired me to dress up like Napolean for Holloween and learn his dance.

    (You have to admit, when you saw him do his dance, no matter how crappy you thought the movie, you got a warm fuzzy for him, no?)
  • IDIOT (View Email) on January 6, 2005 at 10:06 PM
    HOW CAN A MOVIE WITH NO SEX SWARE WORDS OR ANYTHING BAD AT ALL BE BAD?? IDIOT.. compare this movie w/one that has just the much explitives...oh wait there are none... Emma the plot lacked that is it, the characters are halrious just like that spelling.. Uhhhhh how can u say this is bad when oh hmm it grossed more money than you with ur writing skils could even write down.. so get out of my life and shut up

    -nappy D and Me

  • ahah on January 7, 2005 at 11:36 AM
    "IDIOT" is funny because their comment has no point and about 1,000 spelling errors.
  • Adam (View Email) on January 12, 2005 at 6:58 PM
    I somewhat agree with your review, in that the plot was lacking. However, the characters were not bland if you actually think about it. Gries is perfect for the character and is incredibly believable. As a critic, I think that you worry too much about the specifics of a movie and don't take in the whole picture. I'm also not sure you saw the movie, since Napoleon never said "tight" and the slapstick comedic elements were minimal. There was no time when napoleon fell on his face. It's apparent that you don't understand the form of comedy used in this film.
  • Emma Zachurski on January 12, 2005 at 9:29 PM
    Hmm, actually, hate to disappoint you but I did see this horrible horrible movie, when it was just opening for the first time in Maryland at the Bethesda Rowe. Notice the June date on this review?

    As for Napoleon falling on his face, that incredibly stupid "do you take your bike off any sweet jumps" scene where he falls right off the bike. Also, I did "understand the form of comedy" of this film, it's merely a pathetic spin-off of much better geek comedies like "Welcome to the Dollhouse," mixed with horribly repetitive dialogue and awkward teenager situations. Maybe most people over the age of 13 just don't find that funny.

    Any possible truth is the "tight" comment, it's easy to mix up that word with Napoleon's limited lines of "friggin'", "sweet" and "gosh" as well as other such hilarious slang words that are simply toooooooooooooo infinitely brilliant to not be seen as comedic genius.

    The characters aren't bland? Give me a break, each character is only one sided: Napoleon's a loser, Summer's a popular snobby girl, and let's not forget the incredibly racist stereotypes the screenwriters incorporate through Pedro and LaFawnduh.

    PS; why did you bring up Gries of all people in the film, he plays Uncle Rico, he's hardly a character worth mentioning if you're trying to make a point of how funny the acting is, maybe you meant Jon Heder who plays Dynamite?
  • sam on January 13, 2005 at 3:41 PM
    that movie was beyond excellent! it is soo funny, i just love it and i need to learn his dance. i don't know how anyone can say it was bad DANG!
  • Adam (View Email) on January 16, 2005 at 1:05 AM
    Agree to disagree... by the way, ren and stimpy is probably one of the dumbest shows. It is only matched by rocko's modern life.
  • m (View Email) on February 16, 2005 at 12:23 AM
    is he dead or not everyones saying he is tell me the truth
  • Trevor Corbin (View Email) on February 19, 2005 at 8:26 PM
    That movie is the best i have ever heard of or seen i would really like to learn the dance that he does after pedros speach!!!
  • Haley Ash (View Email) on March 12, 2005 at 9:24 PM
    this is an awesome movie!!!!!! i love it make a second movie!!!!!!!!
  • noticing on March 13, 2005 at 2:48 PM
    Most people who find this moronic movie funny just happen to have a poor command of grammar and spelling,airhead-esque mentalities or are simply teenagers concerned with being "hip" and following dumb pop-culture trends.
  • Me (View Email) on March 30, 2005 at 4:54 PM
    i wanna lern the sweet dance moovz i know most of them alredy i just wanna lern mor.
  • roman spielberg on April 11, 2005 at 7:23 PM
    Thank you, Emma.
  • chris (View Email) on May 17, 2005 at 6:35 PM
    This movie was hilarious and just to let you know i do know the dance i did it in class for a project it took me like 1 hour to do the hole thing i laughed when i did see it the first time lol.Just like that one part when he does that speechit goes something like this((The wisards have decided to cast a spell on lake loch ness to blow nesse out of the water but maybe if you could watch it and send it to me i really appericiate it. SO see ya....Uhhhhhhhh...Idiot!!!
  • kelly (View Email) on May 18, 2005 at 1:20 PM
    I WANT TO LEARN HIS ACTUAL MOVES, LIKE TEACH ME HOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  • jacob (View Email) on July 24, 2005 at 10:58 PM
    i want to learn napoleons dance moves so you people should have a sequence of pics and words to point out the moves.
  • just some constructive critici on August 18, 2005 at 1:34 PM
    okay emma... i thought your review was one-sided to say the least. Yes, the movie in question did lack a plot, and all of that artsy whatnot that you seem to love so much in all of your un-mainstream movies. But what is so wrong about enjoying a humorous movie with no depressing or cosmically deep undertones every once in a while? Sometimes people like to go to a movie theater and leave with some catchy lines stuck in their head and a smile on their face, rather than a feeling of emptiness and despair, that usually accompany what seems to be your kind of movie. In my opinion, this movie was definitely not just trying to imitate other films. And many of the scenes that you seem to think are non-sequiturs do have a connection to the rest of the movie and make sense if you would just pay attention, instead of moaning about the lack of plot. For example, the time machine scene: Uncle Rico spends a lot of time throwing a football around and reminiscing about his years on the football team (though I can't remember whether it was in college or high school...); he gets the time machine so that he can revisit his days of glory. I'm sorry that the fact that Uncle Rico, and all the other characters, don't have very moving and deep motivations and that none of them really develop. But the point of the movie was just to entertain, not provoke thought, which I'm sure most people understood. And, Emma, just because it isn't stylish or chic doesn't mean its not worth watching. Just lighten up and learn how to watch pointless comedies. Oh, and also, many people that I know who love this movie aren't morons or preteens who follow trends, they like it because it makes them laugh.
  • Emma Zachurski (View Email) on August 18, 2005 at 2:08 PM
    Wow, over a year later there are still comments. At any rate, I can see where you are coming from "just some constructive criticism," but your argument is completely lost when you assume I only like movies that leave audiences with feelings of "emptiness and despair," my favorite movie, ironically, is "8 1/2" which actually has some of the funniest scenes to ever be captured on film. Sure people like to go to movies to laugh, I do too, but this movie just didn't make me laugh, sorry. Movies like "Dr. Strangelove" or "Divorce Italian Style" make me laugh, not films like "Napoleon Dynamite," which in my personal opinion, is a self-indulgent, archetypal indie comedy, and as hard as this may be for you to believe, there are many out there who don't feel so differently.
  • bizzle on August 20, 2005 at 11:39 PM
    way to go "just some constructive criticism".
    i heart you!
  • Kim (View Email) on October 26, 2005 at 2:17 PM
    This movie is an all time classic. I grew up over the Hill from Preston near Malad, Idaho. I knew the Hess kids growing up.

    This movie takes certain components of real daily life in this part of the country and incorporates them into the best movie ever. My wife and I still laugh uncontrolably every time we watch it.

    Our opinion,,the two best lines: The part about Nesse and the part about Unlce Rico ruining their lives and eating all their steak.
Jump to first comment