Saturday, February 11, 2012 3:39 pm
Montgomery Blair High School's Online Student Newspaper
Tags: print
March 6, 2005

"Once Upon a Mattress" springs into action

by Tiffany Yee, Page Editor
Click here to read a review of the play.

On opening night, the lights dim and the curtains part to reveal a skillfully painted set and actors and actresses dressed in intricately designed costumes. Stress, excitement and effort have built up in the directors, cast, crew and orchestra for this very instant, as they all contribute to this long-awaited moment. The entire production only lasts two and a half hours from the first sounds of the overture to last beat of the epilogue, but it took months to prepare for this night.

"Once Upon a Mattress," Blair's spring musical, is based on Hans Christian Andersen's tale, "The Princess and the Pea." Complete with a fanatical Queen, a scheming Wizard, an amusing Jester and a lively group of knights, princes and princesses, the production is entertaining to watch and possibly even more enjoyable to be a part of.

The general plot is simple. No one in the kingdom can marry until Prince Dauntless (played by senior Sam Wight) first marries. His mother, Queen Aravain (played by both seniors Abigail Fraeman and Koyel Bhattacharyya on alternating nights), however, crafts one dilemma after another in an attempt to keep her son unwed. But at last, Winnifred the Wobegone (senior Elise Harvey), a princess from the swamp, swims the moat of the castle to enter as a contender for the prince's bride. She manages to win over Dauntless and everyone else in the castle but must first pass a test that the Queen and Wizard connive.

Act I

The comedic musical is one of director Anne Cullen's personal favorites. Cullen, an English teacher, saw the musical at Broadway in 1997 and "fell in love" with the tale. "It's light-hearted and whimsical," she says. Although Cullen has directed before, this production is her first musical at Blair. Filling the shoes of Blair's previous director, Kelly Newman, who temporarily moved to England, requires a lot of diligence and time.

Cullen began planning the production in June, before the school year even began. She started to visualize the image of the costumes, the movements on stage and the kind of students she wanted to play the roles. "Since I haven't had the experience of putting on a play here, I couldn't image who I wanted for each part," she remembers. "I had no preconceived notions."

In the musical, the multitalented actors and actresses are also singers and dancers. Tryouts to cast the roles occurred in early December, when over 100 students came to demonstrate their artistic abilities by singing a song of choice, reading a part and learning a dance. Cullen was forced to cut slightly under half of the students who tried out, an aspect that, she says, is one of her least favorite in the whole process. "There's more talent than there are parts," she believes. Still, the final cast list includes about 60 names, a sizeable group in comparison to past productions.

Among those chosen was junior Heather Hurt. Though she only has a minor role as Princess #12, according to Hurt, she gets the full experience by working side by side with such an eclectic group of students. "There's a crazy mix of people: crew and pit," she says, smiling. "I feel like my circle has been extended."

Senior Lawrence Lyons concurs. "I wanted to be a part of a Blair play before I graduated, spend some time with friends, and get to know more people," he explains.

Participating in a Blair production offers the opportunity to work side by side with a wide range of Blazers. Twenty-one percent of the actors and actresses are freshmen, 23 percent are sophomores, 26 percent are juniors and 30 percent are seniors. Adding to the diversity, minorities make up 35 percent of the cast.

Work hard, play hard

Casting is only the first step. Staying committed to all of the duties that come with joining the production is a separate feat. "I tell the students, 'If you're feeling sick, tired, or stressed, think back on the decision you made on the first day. Stick to that,'" says Cullen. "It's a lot of hard work, but it's a lot more fun."

After auditions, the real work comes into play. Actors with speaking roles learned their lines, and eventually, singing and dancing were added as well. Professional dance teacher Nicole Williams was hired to choreograph four numbers in the musical, and music teacher Dustin Doyle started holding auditions for pit orchestra just as second semester began.

One of the final rehearsals for the spring musical, "Once Upon a Mattress," concludes on the day before the teasers, Tuesday, March 2. Click the above picture to see a gallery of rehearsal pictures. <br><br>CORRECTION: "Once Upon a Mattress" runs for two weeks: March 4, 5, 11 and 12 at 7:30 p.m. and March 6 at 2 p.m.<br><br> Tiffany Yee
One of the final rehearsals for the spring musical, "Once Upon a Mattress," concludes on the day before the teasers, Tuesday, March 2. Click the above picture to see a gallery of rehearsal pictures.

CORRECTION: "Once Upon a Mattress" runs for two weeks: March 4, 5, 11 and 12 at 7:30 p.m. and March 6 at 2 p.m.


Senior assistant directors Julianna Allen and Lillian Rosen agree that the hardest part of being on stage is incorporating all of the elements simultaneously. "There's such exhilaration when everything comes together," Rosen says.

Lights, sound, action

"Everything goes on separately and comes together for the big night," says stage crew manager John Kaluta. Kaluta, who has worked on several previous Blair productions, deals with "everything the director doesn't want to do." This includes props, sound, background, and lighting. To put it simply, Kaluta says, "I deal with everything in front of the audience that doesn't have to do with an actor or a costume."

Initially, 60 crew members worked on the musical, but the number eventually leveled out to about 30. Like the cast, stage crew began work in early December. They, too, stayed after school from Monday to Friday to complete the set, maneuver the lighting, and perfect the sound. In fact, according to Kaluta, sound is one of the hardest components to deal with. "During a live performance, it's extremely difficult to have good sound quality," he says.

In order to fully develop each factor, Kaluta dedicated roughly thirty hours a week to working on the play. He spent a few of his lunches buying material, and for a previous play, he even had to make an emergency paint purchase at midnight. Even though running the stage crew is stressful and time consuming, Kaluta enjoys every aspect of his job. "Even though the hourly wage isn't much, seeing the outcome is worth it," he asserts.

Oftentimes, stage crew members feel underappreciated. "Something that bothered me was a musician who asked, 'Do they just push that stuff around?'" explains Kaluta. In reality, the complete set and all of the props were made by students, excluding the throne. Some of the costumes were even sewn by senior Kate Selby, sophomore Eleanor d'Eustachio and freshman Maile Zox.

As a member of the pit orchestra, junior Minh Huynh-Le has felt the same depreciation; however, she sees the production as a group effort. "Sometimes we feel underappreciated, but we're really there to support the cast," she says.

Role call

Students have many options if they choose to take part in producing the musical. "If you don't want to get messy or climb ladders, you can sing or dance," says Kaluta. "There's something out there for everyone."

Wight keeps returning because he "[loves] the people and being on stage,” and "Once Upon a Mattress" will be his fourth show. Wight also enjoys taking on different personas. "Becoming someone else energizes me," he says.

Senior Gloria Dowery, who has a role as a featured dancer in the musical, took interest in attempting something she had never done before. "I wanted to try something new," she says. "I'm not trying to win an award or anything. I just want to have fun."

For first timers, being on stage can be intimidating. "It's a different dynamic, a new experience,” says senior Martino Choi. "At first it was awkward; I didn't know what I was doing.”

However, according to Kaluta, getting that experience is one of his most motivating factors for continually partaking in the production. "It's about pushing people past where they think they can go. As a teacher or a coach, you must let people know they can do a lot more than they think," he says. "Youngsters build confidence. They get ahead."

Junior Kevin Biganmen is a prime example. He was a member of the stage crew last year and was eager to assist again. "After 'West Side Story,' I was like, 'Wow. I just helped make that happen,'" he remembers. "I was really proud."

"Theater is life"

In addition to learning the behind-the-scenes techniques and engineering of a play, some stage crew members, like junior Abel Rezne, work to complete their Student Service Learning requirement. "It's fun, but we also get a lot of community service hours," he says.

The week before the opening, the cast and crew worked until 10 p.m. For juniors like Kat Comisaik, the time was well spent. "We call this hell week. There's so much pressure," she says. "We work long hours, but we're like one big family."

On top of being time consuming, the musical can be highly nerve-racking. "Everyone's stressed. We're here five hours at night," Allen says. "When we get home, homework gets a little sloppy."

Hurt has encountered the same problem. "I get home late, and all I want to do is sleep," she explains. "Then the next day, I'm working feverishly at lunch."

As student directors, Allen and Rosen are exceptionally overwrought. Rosen, who is usually part of the cast, decided to stand off stage this time around, with the exception of a brief cameo. "[Directing] is a lot more stressful than acting," she says. "When you're acting, you're responsible for solely yourself. Now I'm responsible for everyone." For both Rosen and Allen, "watching everything come together and just waiting in anticipation is the hardest part in the end."

Thus far, the show has run relatively smoothly. The recent school cancellations have given Cullen the most anxiety. "The snow days just destroyed it. We'll be ready though," she says. "I don't have a fear we won't make it. Fear is a great motivator."

Although rehearsal time was dramatically decreased, Allen, too, believes that all will fall in place. "Nothing gets done on time. That's the rule of theater," she explains. "Everything just comes together in the end."

Due to a bad case of the flu, senior Idara Aquaowo, who has a major role as the Wizard, has had even less practice time, yet Aquaowo is as ready as she's ever been. "I get the most important role," she boasts. "I do cool tricks; it's total hotness." Late nights juggling her role in the musical and her work at school didn't help her recover, but Aquaowo, who took part in "West Side Story" and "The Merry Widow," is "personally motivated” to be involved. "If you have a passion, it's all worth it. I love doing plays. It's the love of the craft."

Hurt is motivated by the joy she believes the musical will bring to the audience. "My friends will laugh,” she explains. "That makes it all worth it."

Previous productions, especially musicals, proved to be successful. Two years ago, "West Side Story" earned $20,000 in ticket sales, while the total cost was only $9,000. "Blair has a lengthy tradition of putting on outstanding plays," says Cullen. Cullen and the entire production crew plan to keep the reputation alive with "Once Upon a Mattress."

"Theater is life," says Allen. Now, for Allen, the cast, crew, and orchestra, the only thing left to do, along with the audience, is watch it all unfold.

"Once Upon a Mattress" will be playing March 4, 5, 11 and 12 at 7:30 p.m. and March 6 at 2 p.m.

Discuss this Article

  • . on March 6, 2005 at 12:41 PM
    Singing and acting was awesome. Congrats to everyone! Although the color coordination definately needs some work...
  • OUM on March 6, 2005 at 12:44 PM
    I hope that Silver Chips writes an actual review about the show itself. An article much like this was written last year for the Merry Widow, cheating the actors/actresses of written response to their show because a real review wasn't written. IT's interesting to see what other people think about the show. They already know how it happens. This topic does not need to be repeated, I would rather see a review instead. I would also like to point out that the writer mispelled Agravain, the queen's name, and Woebegone, the princess' name. To write a whole article and mispell the name's of some of the leading roles is really frustrating.
  • christine on March 6, 2005 at 12:46 PM
    tiffany you're the best, i LOVE you!!!!
  • John McManigle on March 6, 2005 at 2:22 PM
    I went to the play on Saturday, and it was awesome; very funny, reasonable light, very well-done and impressive. My congratulations to Ms. Cullen, Mr. Kaluta, and above all the cast and crew. Otto's lighting was amazing!

    She swam the moat!
  • Anonymous on March 6, 2005 at 2:41 PM
    So what do regular people think who watched it? Did you like it?
  • Woot! on March 6, 2005 at 3:14 PM
    Awesome job! Go blazers! That has to be the best play I've ever seen!
  • gffhrt on March 6, 2005 at 3:56 PM
    for once can we just have a review of a play instead of a story of "all the hard work that goes into it?" i mean we appreciate it, but i feel like ive read this same story a million times before
  • Joel Turnham on March 6, 2005 at 5:57 PM
    OK, let's see. First of all, you have a whole section called "Lights, sound, action" and yet you did not talk to the sound designer, anyone working on sound, the lighting designer, anyone who works on lights, or the stage manager. Also, some of the crew people (I wont name names) who were interviewed for this article, which is supposed to be a "making of" as I understand it, have only come to stage crew for the past week or so, compared to the dedicated people who have been coming for the past several months just for this one show. You went to one location (I know, I saw and talked to you) and interviewed the people there because it was convenient and easy, even if they were not the best sources. All you had to do was put a little more effort into your journalism and this all would have been better.

    There were other issues in the article ("Cullen began planning the production in June, even before the school year even began.") but I won't go into those.
  • John Chai on March 6, 2005 at 6:01 PM
    Great article! It would be perfect if you talked more about the pit!
  • Jeffrey Lautenberger on March 6, 2005 at 6:56 PM
    i agree with Joel 100%. you beat me to it, i was going to say the same thing.
  • Proud Parent on March 6, 2005 at 8:07 PM
    Blair’s production of “Once Upon a Mattress” is a charming delight. The show is sweet, funny, a joy to watch, and is perfectly cast with a troupe of talented seniors in the leading roles. I also enjoyed listening to the pit orchestra.
  • Kat on March 6, 2005 at 8:31 PM
    yea dude i agree with Joel an Jeff. those certain people who "have only come to stage crew for the past week or so". BLEH!!!i say to those people! crew rocks. the lights, sound, action people are my heros because they did the hardest work of it all. i'm going to mis my crew family. what am i going to do next week when theres no crew!!!!!!!!! ahhhhhh!!!!!
  • By The Way on March 6, 2005 at 9:10 PM
    Emily-Kate Hannapel also sewed the costumes. Don't leave her out!


    love

    emha.
  • great job on March 6, 2005 at 10:40 PM
    nice article!
    don't be so critical of everyone (all those complainers out there), u try writing an article with all the effort and time
  • Anonymous on March 7, 2005 at 9:41 AM
    YAY TIFFFANY!
  • another random crew person on March 7, 2005 at 11:11 AM
    Thank you Joel.
    I have no idea what to do with myself on monday and tuesday. i havent been at home in the afternoon on a weekday in so long. it's kinda depressing.
  • dear stage crew on March 7, 2005 at 3:57 PM
    if you dont like being on crew.... then dont be on crew
  • musical junky on March 7, 2005 at 6:06 PM
    To all those who are critizing the so called "complainers" the author did write a good article, but she failed to speak with cast, crew, and pit members who are the soul of Blair musicals. She should have spoken with the lead females and males who have worked very hard, she should have spoken with the key stage crew people who dedicate huge amounts of time at MBHS working on set, sound, and lights, and she should have spoken with the pit people who have done many Blair shows and have taken time out of their many other music things to play with us. Instead the author spoke to people of convenience who could not possibly back up the ideas she wrote about in her article. As a senior and as a participant in nearly every Blair show since I was a freshman I am disappointed in the lack of effort that went into this article when the cast, crew, and pit put so much effort into making the musical.
  • Rayna Andrews on March 7, 2005 at 9:20 PM
    I agree with Jeff and Joel. I understand that the author had a deadline (right?), but I must say that I find her choices of sources insulting. There are many other people that have worked tirelessly on the show since the very beginnings of the show, before we even had a basic set design. Some people had been staying after school every day until 9 or 10 at night 3 weeks before the show opened, yet some of the sources had started going to crew regularly halfway through hell week. To quote "musical junky" : "[the author] failed to speak with cast, crew, and pit members who are the soul of Blair musicals." Everyone worked very hard to make this show what it is, why only speak to people who are in the hallway at that moment?
  • Joel Turnham on March 7, 2005 at 10:01 PM
    to "dear stage crew"
    "if you dont like being on crew.... then dont be on crew "- what is that supposed to mean? who are you talking to?

    to "great job"
    don't even start about doing something involving "all the effort and time." Trust me, we know about both but apparently the author does not. She showed up one day, found people who were idle and in groups, interviewed them, and did not bother to wait for or even ask to talk to people who are key to the production and would be good sources. She did not even talk to Mr. Doyle, who just so happens to be a slightly important person, namely the conductor of the orchestra for the MUSICAL. Nore did she talk to the stage manager (who runs the show), the lighting designer (the person responsible for ALL of the lighting effects in the show), or the sound person (who makes it so that you can hear the actors). The author needs to have the common sense to talk to at least some of these people. It's basic journalism.
  • Jeffrey Lautenberger on March 7, 2005 at 10:12 PM
    if you dont like being on crew.... then dont be on crew

    who said that?
  • alum 04 on March 8, 2005 at 3:36 PM
    yall fight too much!
  • yz on March 8, 2005 at 6:22 PM
    tiff, you did superb =)
  • Jesus on March 8, 2005 at 8:02 PM
    I said if you dont like bein on crew then dont be on crew.

    cuz yall are complaining about how much work you've had to do.
  • Joel Turnham on March 8, 2005 at 11:14 PM
    to "Jesus"
    Nobody has complained about the amount of work that we have had to do. What we are complaining about is that some of the people that the author interviewed did NOT work as much as most other crew people. Personally, i love dedicating my time to crew. The issue is that the author talked to just about the least dedicated people and used them to represent the entire crew. I personally told the author who she should talk to if she wanted technical sources and she chose to ignore me. Then she continued to write an entire section (as i said earlier) about tech stuff without even talking to any tech people. I have no idea where you got the idea that we are complaining about the workload from. Did you even read the comments?
  • Blair stage alum on March 8, 2005 at 11:41 PM
    Ok... I thing the submit button got clicked somehow on the last comment... so, I'll finish what I was saying and hope everyone can make some sort of coherence out of it.

    No one said they didn't like stagecrew, or the work, or anything else like that... so, someone is talking out of their ass but doesn't have the guts to come forward and say their real name. Also, whoever is monitering the quotes should not have let that one slide by; the name "Jesus" is easily offensive and this is not acceptable behavior for a forum for a respected newspaper where people are trying to be respectful and civil. The mod who is responsible for these comments should not have allowed that. It's clear through the comments and the name of this user, that this person is just seeking attention and perhaps some sort of weird entertainment.

    Well, that's enough for now.
  • Jeffrey Lautenberger on March 9, 2005 at 9:17 AM
    no one is complaining about how much work we do. we are making a point that the article did not clearly express the work of the dedicated members of stage crew, and that the people interviewed were not good sources. i also heard second hand that the deadline for this article was a couple months ago, yet it was written a few days before the play, so that leaves more than adequate time.
  • Ely Portillo (View Email) on March 9, 2005 at 12:58 PM
    In response to Blair stage alum's question regarding the name "Jesus": as this is actually a name, often pronounced 'Hey-seuss,' we see no reason to presume it has a religious implication and arbitrarily change the name.
  • dear stage crew 2 on March 9, 2005 at 1:07 PM
    you all are whiners. stop complaining and remember its the stage crew, not ME featuring stage crew. you work as a team, and it looks extremely unprofessional when you attack people on a public forum
  • lol on March 9, 2005 at 1:12 PM
    Yeah, Ely!
  • Joel Turnham on March 10, 2005 at 12:52 PM
    To "dear stage crew 2:"

    How many times do i have to say this? We are not complaining that we did not get interviewed for the article. We are complaining that the author was lazy and did not think to talk to the right people:
    1) Mr. Doyle (conductor)
    2) Elise (main role)
    3) Otto Shah (lighting designer)
    4) Linda Dye, Laura Cole, or Rayna Andrews (sound)
    5) Me (Stage Manager)

    Once again, i must say that this was simply poor journalism.
  • dear stage crew 3 on March 10, 2005 at 5:57 PM
    i bet every person in the play could make a good case for why they should have been interviewed too.

    But how come mr doyle hasn't complained? how come elise hasn't complained? how come otto hasn't complained?

    i dont know all the other people, and im not sure if they have complained, but it seems like it is just you, Joel, who is angry about these people not being interviewed.

    your not gonna die because silver chips didn't print your name.
  • Anuja Shah on March 10, 2005 at 7:26 PM
    This is such a disappointing, shoddily developed story. Journalism is a lot more than throwing together featurey language: it's about showing the world what you know about your topic--making people care about it as much as you do. This is a good general story, but if you're going to spend about 1000 words on it, actually make the effort to go in depth instead of just getting lots of arbitrarily far-flung angles. Depth also involves getting your facts right. Aside from previously noted typos, here's what you didn't bother to check up on: "Still, the final cast list includes about 60 names, a sizeable group in comparison to past productions. " -Not true. West Side Story, Blair's musical two years ago, had well over sixty castmembers-- nearly 100, I believe. "Among those chosen was junior Heather Hurt. Though she only has a minor role as Princess #12, according to Hurt, she gets the full experience by working side by side with such an eclectic group of students. "There's a crazy mix of people: crew and pit," she says, smiling. "I feel like my circle has been extended." Senior Lawrence Lyons concurs. "I wanted to be a part of a Blair play before I graduated, spend some time with friends, and get to know more people," he explains." -You don't bother to make it clear that Lawrence is on Stage Crew; he's not a castmember. "Twenty-one percent of the actors and actresses are freshmen, 23 percent are sophomores, 26 percent are juniors and 30 percent are seniors. Adding to the diversity, minorities make up 35 percent of the cast." -What about their unique interests? That's the sort of diversity I think Heather was talking about. "Junior Kevin Biganmen is a prime example. He was a member of the stage crew last year and was eager to assist again. "After 'West Side Story,' I was like, 'Wow. I just helped make that happen,'" he remembers. "I was really proud." -West Side Story was two years ago; last year's show was "The Merry Widow." Also, I think you spelled Kevin's last name wrong. And would you mind telling us what Kevin did, aside from "providing assistance"? Also, there were nights where the Stage crew stayed in the theater for an hour or more than cast. Why didn't you interview the rest of the crew? You know, those of us who are as "dedicated" as you claim we are and don't just come to earn community service? Those of us who have been working in the theater since our Freshman years? Those of us who were actually working at the time you decided to interview people for this? Also, how hard would it have been to interview the LEAD CHARACTERS, or more people from this "comparatively large" cast? Aside from sloppy, irrelevant, confusing, or nonexistent transitions, your biggest shortcoming is pretending to have covered "lights, sound, and action," when you just covered action. Knowing Mr. Kaluta, I'm sure he EMPHASIZED (as he always does) how much work the STUDENTS put into the production. The technical crew ROUTINELY stayed in the theater later than the cast-- and this wasn't the whole crew, either. This was the "lights" and "sound" you falsely alluded to talking about. If you're going to mention it, explain it. I'm not offended because I was the lighting designer. I'm offended because you talked to two "crewmembers" who were obviously not devoted if they were loafing in the hall and available to interview during "hell week" (which, as Kat said, is when we're working our tails off). The crew concurs with me, if you're curious. Additionally, I'm offended that you misrepresented the Stage Crew, underrepresented the Pit Orchestra, and had the gall to threaten SCO's credibility by putting this obviously rushed, misleading, and even confusing piece on Silver Chips Online. I'm deeply hurt, angered, and amazed that this--all of it-- managed to slip under the radar of Chips editors. I'm ashamed to think anyone out there would think more than 50% of this article is in any way representative of all the hard work that Cast, Pit, and Crew have actually put into the musical, and even sadder to think you'd try to play this off as justly representative, or even more than vaguely representative, of any parties involved. I apologize for being scathing, but this really was a disappointing article compared to the fantastic stuff I'm used to seeing SCO put out.
  • Jeffrey Lautenberger on March 11, 2005 at 10:07 AM
    here's a grand suggesstion to everyone: enough of the arguing and just come see the play that EVERYONE has worked on.
  • Silver Chips Online Editors (View Email) on March 11, 2005 at 2:12 PM
    While we certainly wish we could write more about all Blair events, Tiffany wrote a 2,000 word story. A typical SCO story is much shorter. She interviewed a dozen members of the production and the main adult sponsors involved with the making of “Once Upon A Mattress.”

    We don’t think this story is “shoddily developed” nor do we think the transitions are “confusing” and certainly not “irrelevant.”

    How this story is hurtful is beyond us, as this story does not minimize the work that the whole crew put together. The tone of the story is entirely congratulatory. While there were some minor errors that we naturally regret, we stand by Tiffany and support her story fully.
  • did you see the show? on March 13, 2005 at 11:53 AM
    To the editors, while I understand your support of your writer, as I would hope editors would do in all cases, I have to disagree with you. As Someone who worked very closely with the cast, we began rehearsing in December. The Tiffany showed up in mid-february. Its not an argument, she simply didn't take the time needed to talk to more people. Those people don't have to complain to make a point, and Joel is not asking to be put in a story. It's a fact, Tiffany didn't talk to all the people in the show that could have made this article stronger and a better representation of the Blair theater. If you have seen the show, you should know that.
  • pit person on March 13, 2005 at 1:45 PM
    I think it's kind of ironic that the author only talked to one person from pit, and the quote was about how pit is depreciated.
  • Joel Turnham on March 13, 2005 at 4:28 PM
    to Silver Chips Online Editors:
    Yes, she did interview a dozen people from the production, but as i have been trying to emphasize, she did not interview the right people in some cases (see my previous post). Also, you say that she interviewed the main adult sponsors and yet there is no evidence that she ever talked to Mr. Doyle. This story was, actually, "shoddily developed." It is a "making of" piece and yet it was not worked on until we were almost done with the musical and did not even get published until after the show opened, the same day that the review of the show came out. One of the biggest issues that i have with this article is that it gives the impression that stage crew comes just because "we also get a lot of community service hours." Yes, Abel does say that it is fun but he would not have known at the time because he had only been coming to crew for a few days. All the author had to do was ask how long her sources had been coming to stage crew and then use her judgement as to who she should quote. ITS CALLED JOURNALISM. BETTER YET, ITS COMMON SENSE.
  • John Willmott on March 14, 2005 at 6:50 PM
    I'm going to have to agree with Joel here. Especially when compared to the review of the show, this piece simply seems like a rushed attempt to post a feature story. It's basically like a summary of a football game written by someone who starts watching in the middle of the fourth quarter and doesn't interview the starting quarterback.
  • nena on March 16, 2005 at 8:53 AM
    dang, anuja, light it up! haha, i agree with u 100% tho, this was poorly written...
  • oy! on March 16, 2005 at 1:59 PM
    oh my goodness!! Stop complaining! Look at what an amazing resource SCO is! Try to count the number of high schools in this country with such a well-maintained, beautiful and informative online newspaper and see how far you get. Granted some articles aren't as good as others, but please, everybody! Give SCO a break. They're here to inform you! If you have that big of a problem with the quality of Silver Chips Online, write a letter to the editor, I'm sure they'd be glad to have your insight instead of angry posts. I doubt they want to publish articles that their readers aren't going to enjoy. So relax, everyone, and appreciate what wonderful resources we have in both SCO and the Blair theatre department.
  • Stage Crew '02 on March 25, 2005 at 9:37 PM
    Joel -- Congrats on the SM gig!
  • KarKar (View Email) on September 8, 2005 at 9:14 PM
    hello, well actually were doing this play this yr. and i was actually cast as a knight but i would like to know what they do:?
  • Christi, Amanda and Maddie (View Email) on April 3, 2006 at 12:33 PM
    We are trying to design the corridor and just need some helpful hints. Any ideas?
Jump to first comment