Tags: print
May 2, 2005
Administration discourages Senior Skip Day
Seniors who exceed the allowed number of unexcused absences because they skip school on Thursday, May 5, the Class of 2005's Senior Skip Day, will not be able to appeal their loss of credit. Furthermore, only notes written and signed by a doctor saying that the student was seen that day will be accepted, according to Attendance Secretary Roxanne Fus.
Fus warned seniors that notes from parents will not be accepted for May 5. "[The administration] just wants to make sure people know [skipping] is not a school-condoned activity," she stated.
Twelfth-grade administrator Patricia Hurley dispelled some rumors that have been circulating. Hurley explained that the administration will not forbid seniors who receive unexcused absences on May 5 from walking across the stage at graduation. However, if a student loses credit in a class required for graduation as a result of skipping school on May 5, the student will not be allowed to graduate.
Fus warned seniors that notes from parents will not be accepted for May 5. "[The administration] just wants to make sure people know [skipping] is not a school-condoned activity," she stated.
Twelfth-grade administrator Patricia Hurley dispelled some rumors that have been circulating. Hurley explained that the administration will not forbid seniors who receive unexcused absences on May 5 from walking across the stage at graduation. However, if a student loses credit in a class required for graduation as a result of skipping school on May 5, the student will not be allowed to graduate.
Tweet
Share on Tumblr







Discuss this Article
07-we can always just arbitrarily pick a day in the year and declare it skip day ;) oops, prolly shouldn't have said that here, the administration goons are lurking. oops, shouldn't have said that either. o well...
It really blows.
02/03/06 Might make sense. or 03/03/06. Or 01/06/06. It's up to you.
Skipping has never been a school-condoned activity. The administration all of a sudden decides to impose all these new rules to try and prevent it, that's ridiculous. I'm fairly sure that it isn't legal for the school to make up a new attendance policy and loss of credit appeal policy for one specific day of the year.
Anyways, to Anarchist FYI past seniors did things like skip every 98th day from the beginning of the school year or other stuff.
Personally, I think this whole policy came down because Blair wanted to uphold its "95%" attendance rate (it's in the little handout that all you guys got talking about how we're a failing school) and seem like an administration that actively enforces rules.
The shool HAS overstepped it's bounds but it has already been doing so. The rules state that students must be warned of their potential to LC before their last absence, none of this "Hey! Guess what! Your teacher never turned in your absense notes and so now you have enough absences to LC and there's nothing you can do about it! Anfd we violated county policy and didn't warn you" that has happened to a few kids I know.
They say that people are best led by example. Maybe the administration should learn to follow the rules before they expect the students to?