Thursday, May 24, 2012 12:10 pm
Montgomery Blair High School's Online Student Newspaper
Nov. 28, 2007

Misplaced mourning

by Kate Harter, Online Weekend Editor and Miriam Ragen, Online National News Editor and Food Editor
The death yesterday of Washington Redskins' safety Sean Taylor was undeniably a tragedy. Taylor was a mere 24 years old and left behind a young fiancée and an infant daughter. But the response to his murder has provoked in the community calls into question society's tendency to mourn the death of a public figure while ignoring the everyday passings of ordinary people.

A moment of silence after InfoFlow yesterday morning gave more attention to Taylor's death than was given to the ten Washington-area teens killed in car crashes in the last two weeks. While the death of such an accomplished player requires proper mourning, the response shows a neglect of issues more relevant to the Blair community.

Where was the moment of silence for Christian Cruz, Alyson and Ryan Purvis, Tavonne Alston or Jonathan Chapman, just five of the most recent teenage car crash victims in the area? Why is it that we don't recognize the people close to our age, who could have been Blair students, who could have been any one of us, but instead honor a man none of us will ever be or know? We choose to honor Taylor simply because of his work at FedEx Field.

Heroes can take any form, from parent to teacher to tabloid-friendly celebrity. Taylor's skill and accomplishments on the football field make him worthy of all the praise he received and the hero-status he attained. But blindly accepting and idolizing a hero can be dangerous. Taylor's death must serve as a reminder to the masses that heroes, too, are mortal, and can experience life and death like any other, and the school community has no need to aggrandize his death to a God-like fall.

Taylor, the Redskins' number 21, was a great football player, and he will be missed. However, moments of silence should be reserved for a significant event, lest people numb themselves to deaths or the meaning behind such silences. Blair's last moment of silence was held on the anniversary of Sept. 11 – a far greater tragedy than Taylor's death. And if we're not ready to take a moment for our peers who have been killed throughout the county, we shouldn't be taking a moment for a football player who was an icon, but also a stranger. Research teacher Kevin Shindel may have put it best when he said that the moment of silence was "emblematic of our tendency to worship entertainers and athletes instead of people that are a lot more like us."

Like any other death, Taylor's should be remembered and honored. But it's one thing for the Redskins football team to take a moment for their lost player - and it's another for a high school to do such a thing.



Share on Tumblr

Discuss this Article

  • Mhmm on November 28, 2007 at 9:54 PM
    Agreed. You guys basically said everything I would have on the matter.
  • hmmm (View Email) on November 28, 2007 at 10:23 PM
    you may be right, a moment of silence mourning sean taylor may not be appropriate, but should we also be mourning teenagers who drive when they aren't licensed and don't wear seatbelts?
    while their deaths are tragic, they do not deserve to be turned into heros anymore than sean taylor, he at least served as a role model on the football field
  • I concur on November 28, 2007 at 10:46 PM
    You guys said it really well, It's ridiculous that the school made some people who hadn't even heard of Sean Taylor until yesterday give him a moment of silence. I agree that it was a terrible death, but it's not like this stuff hasn't happened before in the exact same neighborhood, it's just that people care more since he was famous.
  • Agreed on November 28, 2007 at 10:49 PM
    I was afraid that I was the only one to be disgusted with the overwhelming coverage of Taylor's death. It garnered massive amounts of news time, all the rest of the day's events being pushed back into brief summeries at best. I think it acts as evidence of Mr. Whitacre's claim that Americans treat football and other professional sports are a religion, pure and simple. I'm also not surprised to see that Mr. Shindel would be one to sum up the situation so succinctly.
  • thank you on November 28, 2007 at 10:50 PM
    i completely agree. thank you so much for this article.
  • OK... on November 28, 2007 at 10:54 PM
    If I was in charge of determining who gets a moment of silence and who doesn't, I don't think I would have given one to Sean Taylor.

    That being said, I don't think 10 seconds is ever too much to ask for remembering someone that no, people didn't know personally, but that was a popular figure in many of our lives. Every Sunday for the last two years many of us watched Taylor on the football field, and I know that his death hit many students harder than the non-football-watching student can imagine.

    Isn't talking about how we shouldn't have had a moment of silence that already passed a little heartless? Ok, you may disagree, but those 10 seconds at the beginning of 4th period that you would have spent goofing off will never come back. Many people at Blair were genuinely affected by Sean Taylor's death and saying you're against this moment of silence seems, to me, to be disrespectful of the young man who was murdered and had his life cut short at 24.

    Maybe for the next moment of silence that you disagree with you can just talk right through it - that'll show 'em.
  • to on November 28, 2007 at 11:18 PM
    "americans" treat sports as a religion? have you ever heard anybody from europe, latin american, or africa talk about soccer? i guess not
  • Neighborhood #1 on November 28, 2007 at 11:33 PM
    I think it's important to consider the situation from the perspective of the administration, here.

    Based on the fact that the announcement on the loudspeaker was made by a student (possibly a Blair football player?), it doesn't seem likely that Principal Williams sat down w/ his staff and decided to dedicate 10 seconds to Sean Taylor's memory.

    More likely than not, a small group of students who were deeply affected by Taylor's death (as many of us were), went to the main office and asked if they could make an announcement and hold a moment of silence for Taylor.

    What do you expect the Blair main office to say?
    --No, you can't hold a moment of silence, because it shows "a neglect of issues more relevant to the Blair community."

    That wouldn't be right and I'm glad the administration was able to see that. Furthermore, if there had been no announcement at all about Taylor's death, I think a lot of students would feel that the school had unfairly ignored the death of someone who (though only a sports icon) still meant a whole lot to a lot of people...

    While I can understand the arguments of those who opposed the moment of silence, I think 10 seconds of respectful silence for a local sports icon and father of a one and a half year-old-girl is not too much to ask.
  • blazer on November 29, 2007 at 12:02 AM
    for the most part, I agree. it did seem a bit out of place.

    that said, it was literally less than 30 seconds out of our day. I absolutely do not mind losing those 30 seconds to remember someone who was an important figure or even role model to many. I think it was a nice gesture.

    That said, I do agree that there are many other recent deaths - such as the five teenagers who were killed in our own community - who also deserve moments of silence or some show of rememberance. I think it's also import to reccognize, though, that we can't have moments of silence for everyone. It would take forever.

    in short, it was a nice gesture, personally it didn't bother me, and as long as we don't start every day with a moment of silence for whoever died yesterday, I don't mind losing those 30 seconds.
  • someone on November 29, 2007 at 7:02 AM
    Those 10 seconds really were unnecessary.. The article sums it up.

    Why pay more respect to someone you don't even know than to those in our area? Not to say that it isn't ok to respect everyone, but it seems like the only reason we had those 10 seconds is because he was a football player...
  • Marc Smith (View Email) on November 29, 2007 at 7:43 AM
    I think that its wrong to say that there are more relavent issues. Dying is something that should be mourned. And yes, we tend to have a sort of idol worship when it comes to athletes and entertainers. Sean Taylor was a star safety for the Washington Redskins, a team that many many native washintonians and marylanders come together and watch every sunday almost religeously. Sean Taylor was a role model. We arent paying any special attention where it isnt deserved. He was closer to the hearts of the many fans at Montgomery Blair than the many other people who died that were cited in the article. In saying that, it isn't fair to say that a high school shouldn't have a moment of silence for a fallen sports player. Especially when he was part of our community.
  • be more considerate on November 29, 2007 at 8:10 AM
    While countless other individuals die every day, Sean Taylor was a person who many Blair students looked up to for his outstanding accomplishments on the football field. The only reason that a moment of silence was given in mourning of his death was the fact that Taylor was so close to home.

    "More relevant issues to the Blair community" like what? The Washington Redskins are an area sports team that is followed by many members of the Blair community.

    If YOU have a problem with the fact that there has been no moment of silence for teenagers who have been killed, why don't you initiate one by bringing it to the attention of administration instead of targeting the specific issues you disagree with?

    The fact that you felt it necessary to write this article so soon shows how unappreciative you are of the response from students, which is inconsiderate and rude.
  • edmond on November 29, 2007 at 9:19 AM
    My god. Only a woman would write something like this.
  • The Count of Monte Cristo on November 29, 2007 at 9:21 AM
    It’s got nothing to do with other people going unrecognized. To be frank, no one here really cared about those teens that died. But people did care about and respect Sean Taylor. Don’t start bringing up Darfur or anything like that; it’s completely irrelevant. Sean Taylor’s life mattered just as much as anyone else’s. It’s just that his life mattered to a lot of people. That’s why we had the moment of silence. And with regards to those students, things happen. People are going to die, all ages, all backgrounds. If news stations recapped every single person that died that day, our days would have the tone of an obituary. Sean Taylor was on a lot of people’s mind that day, he still is now. The moment was not only for him, but for all the people that felt it was appropriate.
  • hey on November 29, 2007 at 11:23 AM
    Show some respect for the dead
  • Redskins faithful on November 29, 2007 at 12:00 PM
    I cannot believe people took the time to write this. I cannot believe the school allowed Silver Chips to write this. It is unbelievable how disrespectful so people are just because they don't understand. I am truly truly saddened by this tragedy and even if you didn't know him, he still deserves some respect. One MAJOR difference between these two situations is one is completely the teenagers' fault while the other is not. Sean Taylor is a victim, plain and simple. He did nothing wrong. All he did was try to defend his family. It cost him his life. Maybe he is just like all the other people who die every day. But I don't know them, so how can I feel sad. I cannot control that I break down and cry at hearing this news while the names mentioned in this article are just that; names. I did not know anything about them- they only affected a few people. Taylor's death has affected much of the most powerfull city in the world. Maybe he shouldn't have had all the power he did because he "just played football." The point is he had the power to influence a lot of people and serve as a role model to many kids, especially young black males. If you do not care about Taylor i cannot force you to. But maybe you should take this time to focus on someone in a similar situation to Taylor and mourn their death while others mourn #21. He was a great football player cut down in his prime. He could have become one of the best players ever, maybe. Maybe not. The thing that really upsets me was how he was turning his life around. How he stopped being a thug and tried to help others and open up a little. He had the largest fan base of any Redskin (he has the top-selling jersey of any redskin- and he plays defense!). He was very misunderstood. Those who really knew him understood why he did not trust the media enough to tell them everything. He was shy. He did not use the media to showboat (T.O). He just went about his business on the field. It is a tragedy that deserves the attention it is getting. He touched many lives and would have touched many more if given the chance. That is why Sean Taylor is being as idolized as he is. Because of the stage he was on and the amount of people this shooting affects. You can mourn those you know. I will go about mourning someone that came into my living room every Sunday and inspired me to do what I needed to do by giving 110% on every play. By blocking out the critics. And follow what I believe, That is what Sean has taught me. That is why he deserved a moment of silence.
  • mango on November 29, 2007 at 12:06 PM
    Fans may not mourn Sean Taylor as much as his family would. They do not know the person outside of the football field. Most of the community has heard of him and having someone common in conversations disappear so suddenly is shocking. People are not mourning the person who died but what the person represented on the football field. He was a great player and made football great entertainment for millions of Americans.
  • liberal to on November 29, 2007 at 12:26 PM
    I was in the class where Mr. Whitacre said that and I would have to agree with him. They are not saying that Americans solely count sports as a religion. Europeans and people all over the world turn athletes into idols.

    Also to Kate and Miriam, I was first resistant to this article and it really made some good points. Good Job
  • agreeing blazer on November 29, 2007 at 1:02 PM
    I think this article makes a lot of good points. While 10 secs. of silence is not too much to ask the fact that the last time we had a moment of silence was for 911 shows how much attention Taylor's death is getting. I am not trying to make it seem like it wasn't a tradgedy, it was, but so are the daily deaths of ordinary people. The teens that died in car crashes in the past two weeks should effect the Blair community a lot more, that could be any one of us teen drivers. Why not have a moment of silence for them? If we had a moment of silence for every teen killed in a car accident it would be really productive. It would make us realize the amount of teen crashes that occur and hopefully make people aware of the issue. I think its just too much publicity at school for a sports celebrity when so many other things are going on around us that are more closely related to us.
  • ST21 RIP on November 29, 2007 at 1:17 PM
    I just cannot believe the lack of respect shown by writing this type of article so soon after the event.
  • the fact on November 29, 2007 at 1:17 PM
    The fact that the moment of silence is being questioned, not even being wholly rejected, is disgusting.
  • to many below me on November 29, 2007 at 2:51 PM
    as a blazer, i was shocked just as the writers of this piece were. sure, sean taylor was a great player (i can say this as a marylander who loves the skins) and sure, he was a new father who was turning his life around. but we honored him simply because he was a celebrity. the hundreds of soldiers in iraq right now are all family members also, i bet a lot of them have small children. the dead soldiers' children, too, will not ever know their fathers, but sean taylor's daughter is lucky in that she will have people telling her everyday of her life how wonderful her dad was. but the kids of fallen soldiers will probably not here it half as much. why don't we honor the people who are fighting for this country, whether the cause right or wrong, instead of honoring a man who made millions and was able to enjoy the life he had, no matter how short.
  • mildly ridiculous on November 29, 2007 at 3:16 PM
    so what he was a football player, what about famous musicians or other famous people who die, we dont have moments of silence for them. Also for all those that believe that it was worth it to have a moment of silence for someone who probably wouldnt deign to talk to you, do you think its more appropriate to have a moment of silence for him, than for example, a family member of someone in the school. I know that if a student died we would have a moment of silence, but what makes people who are rich and famous deserving of our attention more than say a store proprietor who supports the local teens
  • I agree on November 29, 2007 at 5:36 PM
    I totally agree with this article, it worries me that we are giving importance to the wrong people. There were other tragedies before this one and they were not taken into account. It is a tragedy but not to the extent to give him a moment of silence.
    I didn't even knew this person and I'm sure there were other students like me.
    Sept 11 was a major tragedy and was treated the same way???

    -with respect to others.
  • RIP MEAST on November 29, 2007 at 5:44 PM
    Guys the moment of silence was because a Student walked into the office and asked to make announcement regarding his death. It wasn't a school sponsored event or anything. Also there is no reason to get upset over this the article says there are more important people, but there are also more important things to complain about. If you want more attention for other victims then talk about them, don't complain about society.
  • edmond was right on November 29, 2007 at 5:53 PM
    Sean Taylor never talked to the media because he said he couldn't trust them. Looks like he was right. The article is about how this isnt that important in the big picture, but so little of our news actually is. Let people grieve for their favorite player dont blame society people care about football
  • ok, on November 29, 2007 at 6:01 PM
    i think who ever spent their time writing this had nothing better to do. i also think its rude and childish for someone who would sit and think about this.sean taylor was a very good person wiether or not others may have saw it. the fact that he was turning his life around counts.everyone has a point where they have to change..with that moment od silence, those who thought that they should have listed those who died in car accidents could have tooken that time and remember those also in there mind and hearts. and who ever thought takin 10sec. out of ur time are just selfish. 10 sec. to remember someone who made name in life is better than taking it and goofying off.
    so with that i think it was very nice that blair took the time to remeber sean taylor who left behind friends and family, not only that but a 1-year old daughter who never got to no him.
  • athletes aren't gods on November 29, 2007 at 6:06 PM
    Sean Taylor's death should be treated with respect, because it is a loss of human life. But as this editorial so aptly put it, he is not a god, and his death was not a "God-like" fall. I am by no means mocking Sean Taylor, his death, or what he stands for, but the victims of those teens areclose to us and more real to us than Sean Taylor could ever be. These teens deserve the same amount of respect too.

    I commed these authors for speaking up.
  • Come on. Terribly insensitive on November 29, 2007 at 6:20 PM
    While your reasoning at a completely distanced level is possible to follow, it comes down to this: what meant more? Were you truly more bothered by Taylor being honored than others were touched? Yes, he was a football player, but if you think that is what this is all about, you are sadly misinformed. This role model, 24, in his prime, with a fiance, with an 18-month year old kid, was turning around his life. He was gunned down. I'm sorry that you are disturbed he got a moment of silence. But I assure you that others were appreciative at a level that far surpasses how peeved you were. You are using Taylor to make a bigger point about athletes, and that is just inconsiderate. This man ended his life early, and you decide to utilize the event for your own ends. I agree, other people may be worthy of moments of silence as well. But for you to have the nerve to tell others, especially students at our school, who they should honor and who they shouldn't... well then you cross a line. You have no right.
  • poor taste on November 29, 2007 at 6:39 PM
    I can't imagine that an opinion piece like this couldn't wait a week or so to show some respect for the passing of a local idol.

    This is in such poor taste and I am really surprised that no one prevented it from being printed.

    Can you even imagine if we had a moment of silence for the local students who passed away in car accidents and someone wrote a story the next day saying that those 10 seconds were a waste of their time?
  • show some respect (View Email) on November 29, 2007 at 6:44 PM
    You guys are being extremely disrespectful. Granted it was not right to mourne for one loss, while not acknowldging another, you have to take into consideration that being a public figure, Sean Taylor will naturally receive more attention. But the blatant disrespect that you all are showing to a person who has passed is not only classless but completely uncalled for. Instead of badmouthing another person, while still ignoring those teenagers that have passed, you should bring attention to the fact that all people deserve to be mourned.
  • blairkid (View Email) on November 29, 2007 at 7:00 PM
    well first of all, does teenagers were driving when they shouldnt have which put them in the situation to die. what about people getting shot and killed here in the dc area. teens who drink and drive are signing a death warrent but what about teens who are just walking to the park and get shot by a stray bullet? they shouldve been the ones in this article. look at langley park. all that gang violence and so many people getting killed there. why wernt they mentioned in this article. look at the gang violence going on in some blair neighborhoods.sean taylor wasnt looking for trouble, it came to him. that is why he deserved a moment of silence. people just say he was bad cus of where he grew up. yea he spit in pittmans face but have you wondered what pittman said to taylor to make him do that? yea he took out a gun at someone who stole his ATVs but what would you do? Be a snitch????call the cops???where he grew up being a snitch is the lowest you can go. sean taylor didnt do anything bad ever since his daughter was born. that shows redemption. he deserved a moment of silence. in fact, we should have a moment of silence for everyone who gets shot in the streets if we could. R.I.P
  • The Godfather on November 29, 2007 at 7:06 PM
    I feel very strongly on this issue. Although I can understand why some people believe that there was too much media coverage on this subject, I cannot agree with their views. Sean Taylor was a human being just like any other, true. For this alone, he deserves some respect. But he was also an icon. To many, he was fearless, invincible, and a hero. He was so off the field as well. This is not about one individual as a football player and those that think it is are missing the point. Sean Taylor broke the stereotype that black men cannot escape from their environments and was truly a good person. He cared for his fiancee and his one year-old daughter. He was shot in the home he was living in with them; he did not abandon them and refuse responsibility: He embraced it. He became a better, more thoughtful person upon the birth of his child. He did mistakes, but all humans have flaws, and none of his were so terrible.
    To those who think that he is no more important than the soldiers in Iraq and victims of other crimes, I totally agree. He is every bit as important as them, no more, no less. His murder and the Darfur situation are totally unrelated and it would be ridiculous to group them together as they have nothing to do with the other. I do believe that our soldiers do not receive enough support and that not enough is being done about the Darfur crisis, but this has nothing to do with that.
    Personally, I find this article and many comments below direspectful and frankly, in some cases, stupid and uninformed. The writers of this article have interesting points but they have one fatal flaw: They clearly do not care about football. This is important because fans of football understand who Sean Taylor was and why his death is so tragic and important, while those who do not can never, ever, understand our sadness. I guarantee that if people who do not care for football did, this article would never have been written. As such, this article and many posts below are uninformed and so should be dismissed without another thought. That being said, this whole concept that mourning has been misplaced thoroughly irritates me and makes me very angry. It disgusts me that some people could question the moment of silence and even think about talking through it as an act of defiance; you are ignorant people and i cannot express my contempt for you on this chat. Sean Taylor deserves respect. Is 10 seconds of silence too much to ask for?! If you do not understand the subject, then don't say anything: Thus, this article is, simply, a load of crap.

    God bless the dead

    R.I.P. Sean Taylor, Darrent Williams, all Iraq soldiers, Darfur victims

    All lives are equal, a point you fail to understand
  • To Edmond on November 29, 2007 at 7:14 PM
    Saying that "only a girl could've wrote this" isn't being constructive. These girls wrote what they truly believed and although people might not agree with their opinions, personal attacks on the authors will not help nor change the way they feel about it.
  • interesting on November 29, 2007 at 7:58 PM
    remember people, this is an opinion piece. getting angry and saying harsh things about the author's is, like "To Edmond" wrote, extremely unconstructive. sure, you disagree, but show some respect, like these girls did. they talk about how sad his death is, but also how sad everyone's death is. if one of my best friends died in a car accident, whether licensed or not, seat-belted or not, it would make me feel good to know that other area schools showed respect in a moment of silence for her. the way thy died doesn't change the fact that they died and they are more like each of us blazers than sean taylor would ever be.
  • ps on November 29, 2007 at 8:00 PM
    to all those who were angered by how soon after his death this went up... this is news, guys. news is only newsworthy if it's soon after the fact. these girls were doing their jobs, and they argued well given the amount of time their editors gave them to accomplish the task.
  • Laura Mirviss (View Email) on November 29, 2007 at 8:12 PM
    In the same regard, I have long wondered (and been deeply saddened) that Blair has failed to have moments of silence or other commemorative activities to honor the lives of Blair students who have passed away. The tragic deaths of Helen Alemu and Andrew Helgeson (during my time at Blair) did not receive the regard they deserved on the anniversary of those days, ones that were extremely painful for much of the Blair community.
  • blazer on November 29, 2007 at 8:56 PM
    "one MAJOR difference between these two situations is one is completely the teenagers' fault while the other is not."

    even if it was their fault, even if they completely screwed up, that doesn't invalidate their lives and the saddness and the tragedy. they were still people who will be missed and loved.

    in the end, it doesn't matter. it was ten seconds out of the day. a student came into the office and asked for a moment of silence, and I am really happy the administators were willing to fufill a students request like that. it was a nice gesture, for the student and for Sean Taylor.

    Furthermore, I am proud of Silverchips for publishing the article. it's in the opinions section, you guys, it is an opinion. They did not criticize those who mourn for Taylor, and they certainly did not criticize Taylor himself. They questioned the moment of silence for Taylor in _our school_ only, not overall. They talked of Taylor with respect and even praise.

    I mean, of course it's okay if you're offended, you're certainly entitled to an opinion as well, but... ultimately, I don't see anything wrong with the way the situation was handled, from the moment of silence to the publication of this article.
  • be more considerate on November 29, 2007 at 9:21 PM
    While it is true that people should not attack the writers of an OPINIONATED article, it was bad judgement on the part of the editors to allow such a critical article to be printed LESS THAN 48 HOURS after the man died. Have some respect, and realize that an article about a subject that was so close to home should probably be a little less rude. OH WAIT - they are editors
  • charizard on November 29, 2007 at 9:33 PM
    I haven't read all of the comments below, so I'm not sure if what I am going to write has already been said. I apologize if I am repetitive.
    I am not emotionally invested in the life of Sean Taylor, and I think that the deaths of normal citizens are very tragic and deserve attention just as much as the death of Number 21. I also think that it's true that people tend to idolize public figures for reasons that may be less than sufficient (i.e money and status). However, I am disgusted by this article, and those who have complained about the moment of silence that was held in honor of Sean Taylor's death. First of all, Sean Taylor was not killed in a car crash, or any other sort of accident. He was murdered. This was no accident and despite any past troubles, no blame can be placed on Taylor for this incident. In addition, I ask those who speak out against Taylor's death being publicized: If the President was murdered, would we hold a moment of silence? The tendency of people to de-value the influence of sports figures in the community is misguided and ignorant. Sports figures, perhaps more than any other public figures, have the power to be role models for young people. I think that many people's need to speak out merely to have an opinion is pathetic, and that arguing against respecting a dead man is pretty shameful. If someone felt that the murder of Sean Taylor did not warrant 10 seconds of silence, than they could have used it to show respect for the teens who died in car crashes instead. Perhaps the moment of silence should have been for Taylor and other victims of gun violence. But there was no reason for the writers of this article, and everyone who posted in support of it, to spark controversy about this moment of silence.
  • the Pooka on November 29, 2007 at 9:56 PM
    While Taylor was a hero to many and an important figure in the community, I don't think we should be placing his death on the same level as 9/11. He should be mourned, but in other ways. The 'moment of silence' should be reserved for nation-wide tragedies, not sport-wide ones.
  • Dantes on November 29, 2007 at 11:07 PM
    Truly in poor taste, this article. I'm disappointed that Silver Chips, usually a very professional news source, would print something such as this. I really expected better from this rather excellent staff.
  • asdf on November 29, 2007 at 11:19 PM
    I don't understand why people are getting uptight about the writers being disrespectful, all they're doing is voicing their opinion. If it's disrespectful does it automatically mean that one shouldn't say it? Besides, Sean Taylor certainly doesn't care that being "disrespectful"(oops! Am I being disrespectful?)

    I'm not saying that you should go around drawing faces on corpses, I'm merely pointing out that this article is hardly disrespectful, it's just an opinion.
  • how about on November 30, 2007 at 7:14 AM
    "Misplaced freaking article.."

    Disrespectful to say any moment of silence is unwarrented.
  • The Count of Monte Cristo on November 30, 2007 at 9:17 AM
    Grief for a Man Who Was More Than a Number By Neely Tucker Washington Post Staff Writer Friday, November 30, 2007; Page C01 Sean Taylor is gone now, and what do we do? Flowers and teddy bears, memorials by trees. His number, 21, painted on the grass at FedEx Field and patched on players' helmets. A moment of silence is scheduled before all NFL games this weekend. Sean Taylor was 24 and a new father, and what do we do? Between death and funeral, there is grief and loss and people talking in bars and on talk radio, disconnected voices and a sadness somewhere at the back of the brain. A feeling that is not, for most of us, for someone we actually knew, but for an athlete we saw perform, someone to whom we attributed larger-than-life virtues or shortcomings. Young, famous, rich, physically powerful, black, something of a prodigal son who had made the turn for home, Taylor in death is becoming a cultural Rorschach test -- something different for everyone. Public mourning for public figures can be extraordinarily emotional, particularly when the deceased is youthful and popular and the death is sudden -- the deaths and funerals of Princess Diana, John Lennon, Elvis Presley and John F. Kennedy all became cultural touchstones -- and Sunday's game already feels more like an act of mourning than an athletic contest. Athletes obtain a weird working-class sort of fame that is less than that of movie idols and music stars but more exotic than elected officials, who actually do things that affect our lives. Athletes work and sweat and toil in front of us, on behalf of a town or a team we love, and they come to personify something about what we think ourselves or our communities to be. Their victories are our victories. Their losses are ours, too. Movie stars make films and that's grand. Musicians play songs and that's cool, too. But, see, they do not pick off a pass and sprint 60 yards for the go-ahead touchdown for your home town with 90,000 people bellowing their name and jumping up and down and the stadium swaying in the evening dark. In our emotional lives, it matters. It's an event. People wear jerseys of these athletes, both as fashion and identity statements. We are them and they are us. "We have our idols among athletes, people we identify with very closely, and when something happens to them, it feels like it happens to us," says Dana Cable, professor of psychiatry at Hood College in Frederick and director of that school's thanatology graduate program, one of only two in the nation. "We saw more of Sean Taylor than many of us do of our family members, so we do know some personal things about him, and so to lose Sean Taylor is to lose someone we know." Thanatology is the study of death, dying and bereavement. It puts grief under an emotional microscope. In this subset of the brain, the death of a child holds sway. There is nothing, psychologists agree, that is worse, and it never goes away. But after that, Cable and others say, the ordering of grief gets difficult to categorize, and the death of Sean Taylor is troubling to us on a more primal level than grief: That of fear. Taylor was a strong, fast, fearless young man who had a reputation for on-field ferocity even among other large, fast, violent men. And yet, even in his home, even in his bedroom, with his daughter and her mother a few feet away, he was rendered helpless. He was murdered in front of people who loved him -- perhaps the worst nightmare in anyone's psyche. "He was so big, strong and athletic, and yet he was killed in an instant. It's just not supposed to happen," says Heidi Horsley, an adjunct professor at the Columbia School of Social Work, who has researched the arc of grief in families of firefighters killed on 9/11, as well as hosting an Internet radio program, "Healing the Grieving Heart." "You want to believe life has order to it, and this reminds us that it doesn't. You want to believe that strong people make us safe. If someone can break in and kill Sean Taylor, then someone can break in and kill any of us. It makes all of us feel vulnerable." It's also troubling because Taylor was a kid from modest beginnings who had risen, by dint of hard work and physical sacrifice, to social success. The son of a police chief, he attended an elite high school in Miami, Gulliver Prep, where he was a football phenomenon (he twice rushed for more than 400 yards in single games), and led his team to the state championship. In college, he cultivated a hard-hitting image at a University of Miami program sometimes mocked as "Thug U." Nonetheless it won the national title when he was a freshman. After just three years, he went pro as a first-round draft pick for the Redskins. But he got a reputation for bad behavior -- a firearms charge, spitting on an opponent. Then he got another reputation -- a kid from the hip-hop generation who was growing up into a settled adult, financially and professionally successful, a devoted dad of an infant daughter. He once was lost, but now was found. Kids from similar backgrounds looked up to him, admired him, drew courage and hope from his example. And then they saw it blown apart on the evening news. "It doesn't play out as the 'death of the common man,' but more the 'death of a hero,' and that's the greater blow," says Horsley. "It bothers us on a very basic level." Sean Taylor is gone now, and what do we do? Number 21, starting safety for your Washington Redskins, was not a distant movie star, always filmed in the best light, always at a flattering angle. He worked with sweat and fury in a violent game. He made mistakes on and off the field, and sometimes those were bad mistakes. He was apparently learning, through his daughter, that it's only love that gets us through. These qualities did not make him right, or a hero, or a villain. They made him a son, a friend, a dad, a guy from the block, someone you knew. Someone you miss.
  • Come On on November 30, 2007 at 9:29 AM
    Lets be honest, the Redskins are an important institution in this area, at least to a lot of people. Sean Taylor was a star player. He died. Therefore, his death affect alot of people. This is not an attempt to sugar coat his actions or make him a post-mortum hero, it is simply acknoweldging the tragic death of a popular figure in our area. Thats just how it is. What happened, happened (i.e. the announcement was made), and theres no use raising such a hissy fit over it. Ignore you self-rightous ideology for a while and respect the dead. Next time something sad, but not sad enough happens, maybe you should run to the main office in the morning to police the airwaves according to your views.
  • A moment of silence for others on November 30, 2007 at 11:33 AM
    I think it's rather reasonable that the faculty agreed to the wishes of the student who asked for a moment of silence for Sean Taylor. But in all honesty, would they do the same if it was another person?

    If I walked into the main office and asked for a moment of silence for a family member of mine, who contributed to the school and community, would they acquiesce to that? I doubt it. It's a matter of importance to the school as a whole - and honestly, that's reasonable, too. It's not to say that any death is unimportant: it's the exact opposite, in fact. But we can't have a moment of silence every day; it's not conducive to the school enviornment. And however important Sean Taylor may have been, the moment of silence for his death is still a heavily divided issue.

    For the most part, I'd suggest that an announcement be made that a vigil is going to be held, instead; or a gathering so that those who are grieving can come together over it. And in the future, cold though it is, perhaps moments of silence should be reserved for those within our school and national tragedies, so that divisions of this magnitude don't continue to occur.

    On a side note: Edmond Dantes is the actual name of the Count of Monte Cristo. Scroll down and you'll see that the Count posted 2 minutes after Edmond. Coincidence?
  • #21 RIP on November 30, 2007 at 11:56 AM
    t is true that this is just one (or two) people's opinions. However, it still shows complete disrespect for the death that affected a lot of us. True, it did not affect all of us but neither did any of these other tradegies mentioned. The reason we mourned as a school was because of the volume of people who knew him and are sad because of it. Cowboy fans are so disrespectful. I guess they get that from their WR Owens. This artice should not have been written so soon. Unbelievable.
  • New Day on November 30, 2007 at 1:38 PM
    Almost 4000 soldiers were killed in Iraq. Have we had a moment to think about them? Mr. Taylor is more important than those American who died to protect and gave us the freedom? We should have a moment of silent everyday for those who devoted their lives for this county.
  • Pathetic on November 30, 2007 at 4:51 PM
    i have lost all respect for silver chips with this article. not only is the article completely disrespectful with its timing, but the argument is flawed as well. Sean Taylor was not just some random celebrity; he was a local hero to many of us all. if there was one person whose death would affect the most number of students in this school, it wouldn't be some drunk teen, or even, for me at least, George W. Bush. in the DC area, that person would be Sean Taylor. may he Rest in Peace.
  • TO #21 RiP (View Email) on November 30, 2007 at 5:33 PM
    THATS NOT TRUE iM A COWBOi FAN BUT WHEN U SAY COWBOi FANS ARE DiSRESPECTFUL TO THE DEATH OF SEAN TAYLOR THAT DOES NOT iNCLUDE EVERYONE. JUST BECAUSE i DONT LiKE THE REDSKiNS DOESNT MEAN THAT i DiDNT LiKE/KNOW SEAN TAYLOR. HE WAS A GOOD PLAYER REGARDLESS OF WHiCH TEAM HE PLAYED FOR. AS FOR THE OPiNiONS OF THESE PEOPLE THAT WROTE THiS ARTiCLE i DON'T AGREE W/ iT BUT i DO RESPECT. i MEAN iM NOT GOiNG TO SAY THAT THE OTHER PEOPLE THAT DIDNT GET A MOMENT A SiLENT WERE NOT iMPORTANT OR SiGNIFiGANT TO EVERYBODi ELSE BUT i MEAN SEAN TAYLOR WAS A ROLE MODEL AND THAT'S PROBABLii THE REASON THAT HE WAS GIVEN A MOMENT OF SiLENCE.
  • Someone you may know on November 30, 2007 at 5:37 PM
    To the authors:
    I complete agree with you. Don't let some of these comments get you down.
  • girl with bucket #4 on November 30, 2007 at 5:47 PM
    Okay first of all, some of the car accidents where the teens died happened in the MORNING. i don't think there is much drunk driving going on in the morning. And just because Sean Taylor was a famous athlete does not give him priority over the others who died, and who could have been any one of us. All that these girls are saying is that EVERYONE should get the same respect. Death does not take priority. The authors are not disrespecting Sean Taylor, but rather, respecting those who also deserve it.
  • The authors are not insulting on November 30, 2007 at 5:51 PM
    The article is not disrespecting Sean Taylor. In the very first sentence, the authors say that his death "was undeniably a tragedy". Throughout the article, the authors commend Sean Taylor, saying he was a great football player. If anything, this article praises Sean.

    It is an opinion. People have different ones. I didn't insult the SCO article about Sean Taylor's death; why are you insulting this one?
  • very Juicy on November 30, 2007 at 10:00 PM
    Taylor's death did not deserve a moment of silence. The main office should have denied that request. I agree with Kate and Miriam - you have the right idea. And to everyone who says that 10 seconds is not a lot, well who are you to tell me how I should spend my 10 seconds?
  • student on November 30, 2007 at 10:20 PM
    when i first heard they were going to actually have a moment of silence i was astonished
    im a nonfootballer, like i dont even know what it is. when I heard the guy died, I didn't know why it was such a fuss. What did he do to help society?
    apparently he has had a few problems- DUI, assault, armed assault, is this the guy that a school should be commemorating?
    I feel sorry for his death, but really, as the article says, a school?
    And as Terribly insensitive says, yes, people do have no right to tell us who to honor.
    Finally, yes, I may not know anything about football, and how incredibly amazing this guy was at football, but that's football. From news reports, he was a jerk in real life, though recently reformed. So why should anyone who doesn't know him or have any connection to him feel like he's some role model? because he's good at football?
  • Anyone Who Says It's too Early on November 30, 2007 at 10:55 PM
    For anyone who thinks/thought it was too early to post something like this (i.e. be more considerate), I was wondering what time did you think it would be more appropriate to bring this up? A week after? A month after? I think that no matter when it was brought up, this would have brought up the exact same controversy that it does now. It's not a form of disrespect, the authors clearly respected Sean Taylor ("Taylor, the Redskins' number 21, was a great football player"), they just had issues with how his death was widely publicized.
  • . on November 30, 2007 at 11:02 PM
    i remember shindel telling us how crushed he was when Len Bias died. and that was from a drug overdose
  • Anonymous on December 2, 2007 at 9:29 AM
    true that anytime would be considered too soon. but the feeling is stronger now than it would be later.
    to student- u dont know the whole story. he made a few mistakes earlier in his career but started to turn things around after the birth of his daughter who will now be forced to grow up fatherless. poor girl. know the whole story before criticizing.
  • do something on December 2, 2007 at 10:48 AM
    To all the people that have such a problem with not having a moment of silence for the teens and Iraq souldiers who have died, why dont you go into the office and just ask for one. stop complaining, make a difference, do something about the way you feel.
  • thanks, silver chips on December 2, 2007 at 6:09 PM
    to everyone bashing the paper for posting this, remember its a NEWSpaper, so good job to the writers for getting it up so soon. that's what i'd call timeworthy.
    whether i agree with this issue or not, i'm not going to hate on the writers. they have their own opinions. it is foolish to write mean things in the comment section just so you can make yourself feel better. this is well written, nicely argued, and posted in a timely fashion. keep up the good work silver chips
  • to on December 2, 2007 at 6:17 PM
    what's really pathetic is the fact that you think you can call someone's arguments flawed when, really, they are the girls' opinions. i think sean taylor, along with every person who dies who is related in some way to this area, needs a moment os silence. but these girls obviously don't. that's their opinion. your lackluster argument is what is really pathetic here.
  • '07 Taylor Fan (View Email) on December 2, 2007 at 6:50 PM
    "Blair's last moment of silence was held on the anniversary of Sept. 11"

    Key word is ANNIVERSARY. We had a moment of silence for Andrew Helgeson as well as the Virginia Tech victims. I'm sure we won't have a moment of silence for Sean Taylor next year. 9/11 was important enough to have moments of silence on the anniversary, Sean Taylor's death was not, therefore they are NOT putting it on the level of 9/11.

    On putting it out too early, it's news now, it would be irrelevant next week.

    That said, he was more than just some sports player. I graduated from Blair last year and go to school outside the State. I know several people from Maryland however that simply idolize him. It would be similar to Cal Ripken Jr. being killed in his prime on the O's. No matter how sick you think it is, people don't care about the anonymous teens that died. When people in Darfur die, they're just more people. When a person, and yes an athlete, like Sean Taylor dies, many peoples' role models, their idols have died. My life doesn't change when some kids die while driving, my life does when a man like Sean Taylor dies. You can argue about the detriments of a society that values celebrities higher than ordinary people, but that's the way it is.

    And to Mr. Shindel, you say it is "emblematic of our tendency to worship entertainers and athletes instead of people that are a lot more like us."

    The reason we worship them is that we want to be them. How many kids when they're young dream of a 9 to 5 job in an office? How many dream of being a teacher (yes some do, and it's certainly a noble profession)? How many dream of being a construction worker? How many dream of being an NFL star? So who do you expect them to idolize?
  • rip on December 2, 2007 at 9:21 PM
    neither of these girls is saying that the moment was unwarranted... they are just saying it makes you wonder about how soceity (Blair's society, in particular) views celebrities. it's clear they are not disrespecting sean taylor in any way or saying he does not deserve to be mourned
  • to on December 3, 2007 at 1:22 PM
    Yes they are saying the moment was unwarranted.

    "However, moments of silence should be reserved for a significant event..."

    They literally say it isn't significant enough for a moment of silence, this idol of many.
  • librarian on December 3, 2007 at 7:45 PM
    Mildly ridiculous said that "[I] know that if a student died we would have a moment of silence." That can't be true if the last moment of silence was for 9/11. Look up Andrew Helgeson who died the day he was due to receive the Terry Hicks award for scholar/athelete. I can't see how that Taylor was "part of the Blair communitee" as some commentors are saying but Andrew was a star athlete AND a true part of Blair and he didn't get a moment of silence. (He got a forum and a banner though.)
  • uh on December 3, 2007 at 11:14 PM
    I think it's sad that this argument is taking place. A family, a community and a team all lost a young man to violence. A student at Blair felt that the best way to honor #21 was by offering a moment of silence. He did what he thought was right for the Blair community which is connected so much emotionally to the Redskins. Can't it just be left at that?
  • Kidd on December 3, 2007 at 11:36 PM
    It's interesting that this is the Op/Ed that has received the most comments so far this year, even more than the one about Blair policies.

    Something more than mourning is misplaced here.
  • Someone you may know on December 4, 2007 at 4:26 PM
    To librarian:
    I am pretty sure we had a moment of silence for Andrew Helgeson. And the Virginia Tech students as well.
  • to many below me on December 4, 2007 at 7:42 PM
    this is sickening. let's bash these two high schoolers because they care about something enough to write an educated opinion on it? that makes sense. sure, you don't agree. that does not make it ok to write mean comments that are degrading to the girls and silver chips. sco is no less of a newspaper for this op/ed; in fact, i think it's terrific that they chose to post such a controversial text. and these girls do not deserve any of the stupid comments below just because they shared their thoughts.
  • The Mahatma on December 5, 2007 at 2:13 PM
    Kumbayah, everybody, kumbayah..
Jump to first comment