Thursday, May 24, 2012 12:26 pm
Montgomery Blair High School's Online Student Newspaper
Tags: print
Sept. 24, 2002

MCPS installs Internet filters

by Branden Buehler, Page Editor
In accordance with the Children's Internet Protection Act of 2000, Montgomery County Public Schools installed Internet filtering software on all school computer networks during the summer.

The filters were first employed on July 1 and restrict access to websites of seven different categories. Sites relating to sexually explicit material, criminal skills, hacking, hate speech, violence, weapons, and drugs, tobacco, and alcohol were all blocked. Access to un-moderated chat rooms and anonymous electronic mail was also limited.

The Children's Internet Protection Act established that schools must have rules and technology to protect both adults and children from obscene material. Schools that did not comply faced losses of federal funding and E-rate discounts, which are lowered telecommunication service rates.

Larry Wong, Montgomery County Public School's IT security officer, said that the delay in implementing the filters was necessary because the county had to figure out how to comply with the Protection Act. "We had to go through a process to look at requirements," said Wong.

According to Wong, implementing the filtering system involved buying software and a list of sites that should be blocked. The county then picked the seven categories, from 40 possible categories, that it wanted blocked.

Even though Wong said that the software company does research to build the list of sites to block, there have been problems with the filtering.

For example, media specialist Lisa Hack said that she has encountered several instances of educational sites that have been blocked. She also said she has "seen sites that should have been blocked, but aren't."

Peter Hammond, network administrator for the Magnet Program, has run into similar problems. He said that the software has a tendency to "miss sites," and block "useful sites." Hammond managed to get the beneficial sites removed from the blocked site list by going through the county's evaluation process, which Wong encourages staff members to do.

Professionals can get sites unblocked by "going through our evaluation system," said Wong. The process involves staff identifying and evaluating web sites using special county forms.

Wong also said that the issues with sites that should be blocked are also being resolved. According to Wong, the software company "updates the sites daily" to ensure the list of blocked sites remains fresh.



 ###   ###   ###   ### 
##### ##### ##### #####
##### ##### ##### #####
##### ##### ##### #####
##### ##### ##### #####
##### ##### ##### #####
##### ##### ##### ##### ##
##### ##### ##### ##### ####
##### ##### ##### ##### ####
##### ##### ##### ##### ####
####################### ####
############################
###########################
##########################
#########################
#######################
#######################
#####################
#####################
ACCESS DENIED!
Access to this site has been denied by SurfControl
The message displayed in place of a blocked web site.




Share on Tumblr

Discuss this Article

  • KC Costanzo (View Email) on September 24, 2002
    Sounds like a problem to me. While I understand that we shouldn't be going to certain sites, it seems to me that teachers are going to have to be more vigilant and look at computer screens as they walk by or just trust that we can police ourselves. If certain sites that could be useful to us for school are getting blocked, then that’s a problem. I realize that there’s an appeals process, but if too many sites get submitted for review, there could be a large back-up and the sites won’t be there when we need them. I say just add that we have to use the computer only for educational purposes to the academic code of honesty we have to sign.
  • Dan Curl on September 25, 2002
    I agree with KC. Since the honor code is so effective, why not just add a section about computer use? That way, since everyone is forced to sign the honor code, no one will be able to use the computers for non-academic purposes.
  • Chris Mulligan (View Email) on September 25, 2002
    Since the school year started I haven't noticed any sites being blocked, though I'm worried a few useful sites I visit regularly might be considered inappropriate and eventually blocked.

    Personally I think it's a shame that this has to be done, but I understand the legal reasons why.
  • Hannah (View Email) on September 25, 2002
    cool, but it needs a new blocking signal
  • Resident Cynic 02 on September 25, 2002
    This is simply another instance of administration's ability to delude itself. Unless their expectations for this kind of control are very low, they will be quite disappointed with exactly how ineffective this kind of measure really is.

    Granted, the problem lies in the Protection Act itself - mearly a political solution to appease the witless masses.
Jump to first comment