May 5, 2009
F for Facebook
For all Facebook's social charm and fun applications, parents may now have the proof they need to limit our use of the social network or prohibit it entirely (gasp).
Facebook loyalists realize its potential to distract from homework and studying and this may have a permanent impact on grades, according to a recent study by Ohio State University doctoral candidate Aryn Karpinski. The study found that college students who use Facebook have GPAs between .5 and one point lower than students who don't have Facebooks.
This is not the most surprising conclusion considering TV and other activities that parents claim are destroying brain cells have been shown to have similar effects. Although it would be unfair to claim a direct cause-effect relationship between using Facebook and lower grades, the correlation is indubitable. Facebook users generally spend less time studying during the week than non-users, the study reveals, predictably because they were chatting, browsing the newest videos or stalking friends. The site has an undeniable attractiveness that causes students to put down their textbooks and log in.
It is hard to dispute the facts, but Facebook cannot be the sole factor negatively impacting student users' grades. There are plenty of other Internet sites - we all love FML - and even non-Internet activities that play a large role in causing student procrastination. Past studies have found that constantly playing video games or watching TV can also be detrimental to students' academic achievement. These types of activities, including Facebook, are all mediums students use to avoid schoolwork.
But there is no need to start canceling accounts just yet. It is pointless to give up Facebook when there is a whole host of other activities that will quickly replace it as a procrastination tool. Our only hope is to gain some will power to log off and study. Oh, but wait. There's that Facebook event that we said we were attending.
Facebook loyalists realize its potential to distract from homework and studying and this may have a permanent impact on grades, according to a recent study by Ohio State University doctoral candidate Aryn Karpinski. The study found that college students who use Facebook have GPAs between .5 and one point lower than students who don't have Facebooks.
This is not the most surprising conclusion considering TV and other activities that parents claim are destroying brain cells have been shown to have similar effects. Although it would be unfair to claim a direct cause-effect relationship between using Facebook and lower grades, the correlation is indubitable. Facebook users generally spend less time studying during the week than non-users, the study reveals, predictably because they were chatting, browsing the newest videos or stalking friends. The site has an undeniable attractiveness that causes students to put down their textbooks and log in.
It is hard to dispute the facts, but Facebook cannot be the sole factor negatively impacting student users' grades. There are plenty of other Internet sites - we all love FML - and even non-Internet activities that play a large role in causing student procrastination. Past studies have found that constantly playing video games or watching TV can also be detrimental to students' academic achievement. These types of activities, including Facebook, are all mediums students use to avoid schoolwork.
But there is no need to start canceling accounts just yet. It is pointless to give up Facebook when there is a whole host of other activities that will quickly replace it as a procrastination tool. Our only hope is to gain some will power to log off and study. Oh, but wait. There's that Facebook event that we said we were attending.


Digg
del.icio.us
StumbleUpon
reddit
Facebook
Discuss this Article
Sure, there are a many websites and activities that students use for procrastination. But as far as I can see, the sole purpose of Facebook among students is to waste time. Best to do as I do and avoid creating an account altogether...
Your mention of it was dubious from the beginning, and your attack on the study only seems to make it more creditable.
thats y i used myspace and menssenger =)
"...the students who shared their grades weren't representative of all Ohio State students: Many participants were from the school of education, because Ms. Karpinski generally approached professors she knew. The survey only covered those students who showed up to those professors' classes on the days the survey was administered. And their grades and study hours weren't controlled for their field of study, meaning the sample was potentially skewed, which the study's authors acknowledge."
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124034974305240495.html
But, I'm currently wasting time on SCO, so maybe this is lowering my grade...