May 27, 2009
A need for a movie "Terminator"
It's hard to know where "Terminator Salvation" falls on post-apocalyptic man versus highly-intelligent machines movie spectrum. On one hand (in this case it would be a sturdy metal appendage), this flick capitalizes on the advancements in Computer-Generated Imagery (CGI) technology and brilliantly uses them to depict an ominous planet earth that is being terrorized by robots. On the other hand, though, its sloppy plot, pointless characters and melodramatic script drag the movie down to mediocrity.
Chips Rating:
User Rating:
"Terminator Salvation" is both a prequel and sequel to the three respective "Terminator" movies that precede it. The film mostly takes place in post-apocalyptic California in 2018 and follows a battle between a coalition of super-computers called Skynet and earth's last humans that oppose them who call themselves the resistance. The film's protagonist, John Connor (Christian Bale) has traveled back in time to protect his father from being murdered by the robots that are bent on killing the entire human race. Along for the ride is Marcus Wright (Sam Worthington), a death row inmate who is resurrected years after being executed because he donated his body to science. As the war ensues, the two, along with others in the cause, have difficulty resisting Skynet's tricks and treachery.
It's a shame that the filmmakers even bothered to include dialogue in this movie because it only worked to overcomplicate the plot. The value of "Terminator Salvation" comes from the exciting action scenes where Bale and others blow up and crush robots in efforts to defend the human race. The talking, unfortunately, detracts from this by adding confusing elements. If viewers think too hard about how John Connor would be able to travel back in time to prevent his father's death or why Marcus Wright came back to life only after an explosion, their brains might blow up as well.
In addition to the shoddy plot, the myriad of corny one-liners drags this dud even further down. While fans of the old movie might expect a Schwarzenegger-like homage to "I'll be back," instead, the film was rife with meager attempts at profundity. That, paired with poor acting, threw the movie off course even more.
Also disappointing was the film's star. Bale was extremely perplexed and dull in his role as Connor. Perhaps exemplary of his one-sided acting abilities, Bale grimaced and touted around in a similar fashion to the way he acted in the "Batman" movies.
If being bombarded by explosions and wild robot attacks were not enough, the film also included biblical allusions. Yes, that's right, "Terminator Salvation" is an allegory. This analogy is based around Marcus Wright and is initially apparent in the opening scene where he is executed while he is standing up and is attached to a cross-like table. Wright is then resurrected and goes on to act even more like a deity as the movie progresses. It continues as the protagonists make their way through the literal "valley of death."
If viewer's heads don't spin by the end of this movie, their resilience should be applauded. This movie fails because it tries too hard to be something it's not. It would have been a much better use of time to create series of montages of robots blowing up for under two hours. Don't bother to see "Terminator" unless "Star Trek" is sold out.
Terminator Salvation
(released May 22, 2009)User Rating:
A battle has been waged between a series of high-tech robots and the defenders of the human race in "Terminator Salvation" Picture courtesy of Warner Bros.
It's a shame that the filmmakers even bothered to include dialogue in this movie because it only worked to overcomplicate the plot. The value of "Terminator Salvation" comes from the exciting action scenes where Bale and others blow up and crush robots in efforts to defend the human race. The talking, unfortunately, detracts from this by adding confusing elements. If viewers think too hard about how John Connor would be able to travel back in time to prevent his father's death or why Marcus Wright came back to life only after an explosion, their brains might blow up as well.
In addition to the shoddy plot, the myriad of corny one-liners drags this dud even further down. While fans of the old movie might expect a Schwarzenegger-like homage to "I'll be back," instead, the film was rife with meager attempts at profundity. That, paired with poor acting, threw the movie off course even more.
Also disappointing was the film's star. Bale was extremely perplexed and dull in his role as Connor. Perhaps exemplary of his one-sided acting abilities, Bale grimaced and touted around in a similar fashion to the way he acted in the "Batman" movies.
If being bombarded by explosions and wild robot attacks were not enough, the film also included biblical allusions. Yes, that's right, "Terminator Salvation" is an allegory. This analogy is based around Marcus Wright and is initially apparent in the opening scene where he is executed while he is standing up and is attached to a cross-like table. Wright is then resurrected and goes on to act even more like a deity as the movie progresses. It continues as the protagonists make their way through the literal "valley of death."
If viewer's heads don't spin by the end of this movie, their resilience should be applauded. This movie fails because it tries too hard to be something it's not. It would have been a much better use of time to create series of montages of robots blowing up for under two hours. Don't bother to see "Terminator" unless "Star Trek" is sold out.


Votes: 12
Digg
del.icio.us
StumbleUpon
reddit
Facebook
Discuss this Article
Granted, Terminator's characters were flat, but the plot was consistent and yes, it made sense. It was far better than Terminator 3.
I think other than special effects glamour, American sci-fi lost its way. Foreign movies, like Chrysalis, are far better films.
I'm not saying it was a spectacular movie but it was what I expected and it was enternaining. Why must every movie we see move us in some profound way to be considered good? Maybe the writer of this article should come down off of thier lofty pedestal before they write about something and even get the specifics of what they just saw screwed up. Sounds like they just watched all of the Terminator movies at once and got them mixed up. If you don't watch that genre of films and don't care for them maybe you should stick with writing something you know about.
The Film doens't clarify how Marcus Wright went from 2003 to 2018. It is clear, however, that cyberdyne created Marcus in present form before judgement day and that the machines (skynet) adopted this project as their own. THis is explained towards the end of the movie.
and to all the haters, jenna rocks so you guys can just deal
btw Luke, you spelled drivel wrong. Good job!!
And way to completely miss the plot... time traveling John Connor?