Side Bar

August 14, 2009

Denying them a league of their own

Blake Morgan-Gamber, Staff Writer
Flash forward to August 2012. A time sports fanatics all over the world crave every four years has finally come. But the quadrennial summer Olympic Games in London will be missing something that will bring disappointment to young female athletes around the world: fastpitch softball.

Graphic by Elaine Lin.
In July 2005, the International Olympic Committee (IOC) decided to drop softball from the London Summer Olympic Games in 2012, making it the first sports to be cut from the Olympics since 1936. For a sport to be recognized as an ongoing part of the Olympic Games, it must receive a majority vote from members of the IOC. This is where softball struck out.

Fastpitch softball was first introduced to the 1996 summer Olympic Games in Atlanta, and received major international attention ever since. It has not been clarified why the sport was cut but it is possible that the IOC feared USA softball dominance. Yes, the sport originated in the United States. Yes, softball players on team USA have dominated from a statistical standpoint. But the USA team has left plenty of room for international competition. In fact, though the United States secured the gold with relative ease in the 1996 games, in subsequent years Australia and Japan posed a threat to the USA squad. Their dominance was not always assured.

Due to similar concerns about U.S. dominance, until 1988, NBA basketball players were excluded from the summer Games to create an even playing field for the basketball players of other nations. Since the Olympics were intended for amateur athletes, it was regarded as unfair to allow professional athletes, who make millions of dollars a year, to participate in the Games. As a result, team USA's basketball team gave college players the opportunity to represent the United States.

However, when NBA players were allowed to participate in the 1992 Barcelona Games, team USA conquered every team in their path. Although they heavily dominated, the NBA players were never prohibited from participating and the sport was never cut.

Furthermore, because team USA has such a strong softball organization, USA softball's participation in the Olympic Games encourages female athletes around the world to try the sport. Certainly, taking a sport out of the Olympics will not help it to grow in popularity. As part of the summer games, the sport was sure to continue to attract more fans and more players worldwide.

It is unjust to discontinue a sport because one team might have dominated; removing softball from the Olympic summer games cut the sport short before it had the opportunity to attract competitors across the globe. Ultimately, the goal of the Olympic Games is to provide amateur athletes with the opportunity to represent their country at an international level and cutting a sport from the games so abruptly is contradictory to that founding principle. Moreover, cutting a popular women's sport from the field of competition makes it more difficult for women athletes to receive the type of attention they deserve nationally and internationally.
Digg del.icio.us StumbleUpon reddit Facebook

Discuss this Article

  • Jon Cariba Phoenix on August 16, 2009 at 8:24 AM
    I agree with the author. The double standards surrounding female sports are insane. It's like you can be athletic, but not too athletic because if you are you're a "lesbian." And female sports (aside from not being integrated in the first place) are constantly covered less, and then things like this happens.

    For a very good look at this, check this out:
    http://www.thenation.com/doc/20090720/zirin
  • askduhasd on August 16, 2009 at 11:52 AM
    the timing of this blog is kinda weird, seeing as the event occured in 2005. and it's still quite a ways away from 2012.

    that aside, this is an awesome blog.
    • Pat Connor on August 17, 2009 at 12:31 PM
      The IOC recently had the opportunity to re-instate softball for the 2016 Olympics. A vote held last Thursday failed. Instead the IOC went for golf and rugby. I think that vote what this blog is re-acting to.
  • '10blazerr on August 16, 2009 at 3:52 PM
    ahahaa rope climbing was cut from the olympics. i can see that. thats a stupid event.

    i didn't know, however, that they had cut softball. that's awful- thats actually i good spoty.
  • anonymous on August 16, 2009 at 4:47 PM
    yeahh blake
  • anon on August 17, 2009 at 9:52 AM
    The timing of the blog is actually appropriate. Softball just put on a major campaign to get softball back into the Olympics in 2016 - the vote was Thursday, and they lost out to rugby and golf.
  • Angela on August 17, 2009 at 3:15 PM
    I'm boycotting the olympics due to the loss of softball in olympics and encouraging everyone to do the same.
  • Mandi on August 17, 2009 at 3:24 PM
    actually... the timing of the blog is not as weird as you think... they just voted on August 13, 2009 to NOT include softball in the 2016 olympics.... so we now have to wait until 2020 to see softball in the Olympics and that is only IF it gets reinstated for 2020 Olympics. Softball is a great sport to play and watch and has been my favorite part of the Olympics since it was brought in. It is disappointing that they would eliminate softball but include some of the sports that are still in the Olympics.
  • nancy libby on August 17, 2009 at 5:48 PM
    The decision to cut Softball is so sad for all the girls all over the world who have grown up with dreams of at least trying to compete for the gold. And for golf and rugby no less. So sad.
  • anoymonus on August 18, 2009 at 12:33 AM
    if you look at most of the pro softball players they look pretty butchy. im just sayin
  • anonymous on August 18, 2009 at 2:54 PM
    blake is my favorite
  • laura on August 20, 2009 at 7:25 PM
    blake, this is an awesome blog
  • '10 on August 23, 2009 at 3:01 PM
    they also cut baseball, it's not just about denying women a sport

    add major leaguers to baseball, include baseball and softball and the US would be right up there in both
    I would like to see that
  • Theresa on August 30, 2009 at 10:40 PM
    Ahem. They cut baseball, too. I'm not saying it's fair. I'm not saying that I'm not pro-women's rights. I'm not saying that I'd rather watch golf than either softball or baseball. But I think it's kind of crazy to take this whole "they're taking away oppurtunities for women athletes" stance. Two sports were cut, two genders had oppurtunities taken away. Save the feminism for where it actually counts.
    • feminism on September 3, 2009 at 11:22 PM
      I agree. I think the author may have stretched the whole young-girls-won't-have-role-models-without-softball-in-the-olympics point. There's no evidence to show that adding a sport to the Olympics increases its popularity. Otherwise, I agree with this blog.
  • Paul O'Brien on October 14, 2009 at 11:13 AM
    This is actually a very big blow to the sport of softball. Though baseball was cut as well, the effect on softball is far greater. The Olympics was softball's biggest stage. Ask most casual softball fans about international play outside the Olympics, and most will draw a blank. The World Cup, Canada Cup, etc. are all "also rans" compared to the effect of the Olympics on the game of softball.

    Baseball has the MLB, and with that, a huge focal point every fall with play-offs and the World Series. Even the Japan league and summer Caribbean League are bigger draws than Olympic baseball.

    So with that, women did lose much more than the men in the cutting of these 2 sports. And this does not even take into account the monies raised for youth programs by Team USA to continue to grow the game. With the loss softball's biggest stage, the funds available from Team USA will be dramatically, negatively effected.

    Great job, Blake, on a great blog/article about a great game!
Leave a Comment