Montgomery Blair High School's Online Student Newspaper
Friday, December 15, 2017 3:25 am
Latest:
Oct. 20, 2009

Spike Jonze's "Wild Thing" of a movie

by Warren Zhang, Managing News Editor and Ombudsman
Considering all the films this year, "Where the Wild Things Are" is arguably the most subjective film. Director Spike Jonze has crafted a film that some audience members will revere as an instant classic while others will decry as a wasted adaptation. "Wild Things" is unlike any childrenís film in recent history. Instead of the family-friendly romp with arthouse pretensions as the marketing suggests, "Wild Things" is a fundamentally flawed probe into the psyche of a 9-year-old boy.

Where the Wild Things Are

(released October 16, 2009)
Caption: After a fight with his mom, Max (Max Records) runs away from home to join the Wild Things living on a remote island.
Chips Rating:
3 stars
PG
User Rating:
1 stars Votes: 6
After a fight with his mom, Max (Max Records) runs away from home to join the Wild Things living on a remote island. Picture Courtesy of Warner Bros.
Max (Max Records) is a determined and boisterous child who gets into a heated and physical argument with his mother. As a result, he runs away from home and tramples upon a world of furry creatures. Upon meeting the Wild Things Max connects with them, forming relationships and they soon declare him their "king." Through his interaction and escapades with them, Max becomes increasingly attached with that world, progressively going through emotional and mental growth. Soon, however, conflicts arise when Max and the Wild Things conflict over Max's behaviors and other doings.

What Jonze and cinematographer Lance Acord undoubtedly excel at with "Wild Things" is filming a remarkably beautiful and vibrant setting. Handheld camera motion and amazing computer graphics (CG) work on the faces of the Wild Things and added to the picturesque Australian background where the movie was filmed combine to make "Wild Things" the most cinematically-incomparable films this year. Yet a few flaws in the CG prevent Jonzeís latest from reaching visual perfection. For one thing, the animatronic work done on two smaller Wild Things look appallingly fake, even worse than the animals in the 1999 "Animal Farm."

The scoring, likewise, is well done with a few blemishes. Composers Karen O (of the indie band the Yeah Yeah Yeahs) and Carter Burwell compose effective and mesmerizing songs that soundly complement the action on screen. Unfortunately, one of the songs incoporates sounds reminiscent of the main theme of "Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind," providing a needless distraction from the motion picture.

Acting is more of a mixed bag. Max Records gives the best performance from a child actress since Abagail Bresinís role in "Little Miss Sunshine." Recordís nuanced performance makes Max feel like a real, living child instead of the usual canned and trite performances child actors provide. The rest of the cast suffers incredibly from being forced to communicate the childish dialogue featured in the script. Catherine OíHara (as the sarcastic and cynical Judith in this film) is a great actress but when she has to speak with Max about an imaginary gizmo called a "Recracker," the performance comes across as forced rather than natural.

The script, a collaboration between Director Jonze and writer Dave Eggers, will really polarize audience members. The story starts out with following Max around on a normal day. Thereís a Bourne-esqe "action" sequence involving Max wrestling with his dog, a snowball fight, and some more antics. After about 20 minutes into the film, Max escapes from home and it is at this point that the script introduces the titular Wild Things. Voiced by an all star cast, including James "Tony Soprano" Gandolfini, the Wild Things represent Maxís different emotional components as he tries to create a new, better life with the Wild Things in a role as "king."

The biggest problem is that the writing duo of Jonze and Eggers has turned Maurice Sendakís 10 sentence long picture book into a lengthy childrenís movie without injecting substantial elements to the plot or character development. Without instantly identifying with Max at the onset of the opening scene, it's rather difficult to engage with the movie. If you donít already like Max when he first shows up on screen, nothing that happens over the course of the film will make you like him. Without any emotional investment in Max, the paper-thin plot crumbles apart and "Wild Things" wanes miserably.

However, if you can sympathize with the plight of an overly-imaginative, attention-craving 9 year old boy, you will overlook many of the movieís faults. "Wild Things" will transport you back to a time where you only craved a motherís love or make you revisit a phase that's not worthwhile.

"Where the Wild Things Are" (94 minutes) is rated PG for mild thematic elements, some adventure action and brief language. Now playing in theaters everywhere.






Share on Tumblr

Discuss this Article

Silver Chips Online invites you to share your thoughts about this article. Please use this forum to further discussion of the story topic and refrain from personal attacks and offensive language. SCO reserves the right to deny any comment. No comments that include hyperlinks will be posted. If you have a question for us, please include your email address or use this form.
 

  • JJ on October 31, 2009 at 2:42 PM
    This review didn't make all the sadness go away.
  • ASK on December 7, 2009 at 1:00 PM
    How on earth did THIS get a 3/5 and New Moon got a 4/5?

    That's just ridiculous. I can't think of a single way New Moon was better than WTWF. I'm sorry, but this just shot my opinion of SCO's reviews WAY down.
Jump to first comment