Montgomery Blair High School's Online Student Newspaper
Wednesday, December 13, 2017 9:58 am
Latest:
Tags: Hat Policy
Feb. 8, 2012

Hats off to hats on

by Mimi Verdonk, Online Sports Editor
For some it's a simple snapback and for others it's a beanie. The classiest among us may bring out a fedora or a beret. No matter the form they take, hats are strictly prohibited to be worn by Blazers from 7:25 a.m. to 2:15 p.m. unless it serves religious purposes. So why the cap on caps?

All puns aside, a hat prohibition is nothing new. For most Blazers, hats have become attire strictly reserved for weekends and after school. Similar rules also apply to wearing bathing suits or halter-tops in school, though rules don't always keep students from wearing whatever they want. Hats at Blair never seemed to trigger much conflict before this year's bombardment of afternoon announcements emphasizing the rule and squeak of an administrator's cart during 5th and 6th period lunch snatching hats off people's heads where they remain in the main office for 30 days. Many students would be surprised to find that the hat policy isn't universal, not even universal for the County.

Sophomore Ismail Lapp-Kamara completes his look with a cool hat. Molly Ellison
Sophomore Ismail Lapp-Kamara completes his look with a cool hat.
The Montgomery County Public School (MCPS) policy on dress code is a bit murky. Students aren't allowed to wear anything related to gangs, drugs, alcohol or sex because those items were determined as being disruptive to the learning of other students. But what constitutes disruptive? Who draws the line between acceptable and offensive? Under MCPS's requirements, this allows each school to create their own regulations. So why should a student at Walter Johnson, where the dress code solely refers back to MCPS's guidelines, be allowed to wear a hat, while someone at Blair, which forbids all non-religious or non-administration approved head coverings, can't? Not only is it unfair that students at Blair are prohibited from wearing hats, but it is discriminatory. As MCPS students we should all be granted the same rights whether we live in Silver Spring, Bethesda or Damascus.

The most common answer to why hats are banned is a school's fear of gangs being represented in an educational environment. But from what I've observed, wearing a hat does not make a person a member of a gang. More often than not, a hat is simply an expression of the person wearing it. They show off your favorite team, your favorite colors or maybe they are just there to keep your head warm. Wearing a Redskins hat is really no different than wearing a Redskins jersey or Redskins socks. So what's the big deal?

Though it was generous of Ms. Johnson to provide one day a month where hats can be worn, if hats are okay for one day, why not every day? If you want hats, hats off to hats on. Tyga puts it best in "Snapbacks Back" when he says: "[bring] snapbacks back."



Share on Tumblr

Discuss this Article

Silver Chips Online invites you to share your thoughts about this article. Please use this forum to further discussion of the story topic and refrain from personal attacks and offensive language. SCO reserves the right to deny any comment. No comments that include hyperlinks will be posted. If you have a question for us, please include your email address or use this form.
 

  • ball player on February 8, 2012 at 3:19 PM
    Good stuff mims!
  • lala on February 8, 2012 at 11:47 PM
    Btw, Ismail is a sophomore, not a freshman
  • bonified_swag on February 9, 2012 at 9:56 AM
    I agree. Why can't we where hats OR hoods. Last time I checked hoods aren't hats. We should be able to where what we want when we want with the school giving use any Bull.
  • btdubbs on February 9, 2012 at 3:45 PM
    Fish's a sophomore. Just sayinnn
  • Anonymous on February 9, 2012 at 5:12 PM
    Ismail is no longer a freshman. That photo is taken from an old SCO album from the 2010-11 school year. I would have instead either not included any photo or included a current one.
  • Big Brother on May 20, 2012 at 8:17 AM
    Not hats or hoods because when you decide to steal and molest, we need to be able to identify you on the video surveillance feeds. That hat or hoodie will be obscuring your facial features making it difficult for the face recognition software to do its job.
  • bookgirl on October 22, 2012 at 8:52 PM
    hats should be allowed!
Jump to first comment

Related Stories

  1. Hats off to hats on