Montgomery Blair High School's Online Student Newspaper
Tuesday, August 21, 2018 1:44 pm
Sept. 15, 2012

"No Easy Day" gives everyone a hard time

by Aanchal Johri, Online Editor-in-Chief
Ask someone about the Navy SEAL Team 6 and they will likely launch into a description of their unwavering bravery to combat terrorism, their precarious mission to kill Osama bin Laden and now their possible lawsuit against a controversial book.

The novel "No Easy Day" prompted the Pentagon to threaten to sue its author over its controversial contents. Courtesy of Navy Times
The novel "No Easy Day" prompted the Pentagon to threaten to sue its author over its controversial contents.
A former SEAL (known now as the United States Naval Special Warefare Development Group) member, using the pseudonym Mark Owen, recently wrote the memoir "No Easy Day" regarding the team that killed Osama bin Laden back in May 2011. The book describes Owen's life as a SEAL in the first half of the book and a detailed sequence of the events that occurred during the Abbottabad raid in the second half. The book was intended to be published on Sept. 11 to honor the victims of bin Laden's worst attack. However, due to public interest, Owen's publisher moved the release date to Sept. 4 and ramped up the first printing from 300,000 copies to 575,000.

Now, after over one million copies of the book have been sold, the Pentagon is threatening to press charges on Owen, claiming that he may have disclosed confidential military secrets. While Owen should have had the book reviewed before publication, the Pentagon has inflated the situation to the point where Owen, a man who embarked on one of the riskiest military missions in American history, is now at the center of controversy.

The Pentagon has already reviewed the book, yet they still cannot decide for sure if they will formally press charges against Owen. While they are still making up their minds, they have decided to take the issue public by issuing statements that claim Owen was at "the height of irresponsibility." The Press Secretary for the Pentagon himself steadfastly condemned the decision to release the book without prior review from the Pentagon. One statement claims that the Pentagon only wishes to stress the importance of maintaining national security. However, if this was really the case, then cracking down solely on the military without involving the court system should have been able to suffice.

Although it is true that Owen should have gotten the book approved before having it released, he does not deserve the public humiliation that the Pentagon is bringing upon him. In fact, it is even counterproductive to publicly announce that the book may contain controversial military secrets, since that statement will only inspire the public to read it even more. There is little reason for the issue to explode into the public which is exactly what happened after the Pentagon made such remarks about the author especially since the Pentagon has not even decided whether they have enough solid ground to sue the author for giving information that may or may not be confidential.

Bissonnette wrote about his team's mission to the Abottabad compound, above. Courtesy of International Business Times
Bissonnette wrote about his team's mission to the Abottabad compound, above.
Regardless, the prospect of facing a lawsuit is tarnishing Owen's name. The controversy surrounding the contents of the book is diminishing his success as both a writer and a former SEALs member. Now many Americans are associating Owen as a traitor, rather than the hero who combat terrorism. The Pentagon's accusations have inspired heavy criticism from individuals outside the Pentagon as well, and many are now skeptical of Owen's work. There are several reports claiming that Owen wrote the book purely for the monetary profit. Others are starting to say that Owen wrote the book out of anger when others encouraged him to retire from the SEALs. It is really unfortunate that so many find it hard to believe that a military SEAL simply wants to share a moving lifetime experience and honor his fellow SEALs.

The mass popularity of this book, even a year and a half after the mission, shows that the public is still hungry for information about what really happened the night of the raid. Movies such as "Act of Valor" give insight into the kind of training and missions that the Navy SEALs deal with, but the public wants and deserves to know more about the mission that killed the mastermind behind the 9/11 Attacks.

The novel speaks truly about what happened the night of the raid in Owen's eyes, which makes it all the more real and compelling. Had it been thoroughly censored and corrected by the Pentagon, the persuasiveness of the book would likely be ruined. The book should not compromise military confidentiality, but since Owen firmly believes that book focuses more on the emotional aspects of the mission, rather than the military techniques employed, the novel will be enlightening for Americans to read. The book was intended to honor the SEALs and symbolize a turning point in the war against terrorism. However, the Pentagon handled the situation in such a way that even an insightful book is now associated with controversy.

Share on Tumblr

Discuss this Article

Silver Chips Online invites you to share your thoughts about this article. Please use this forum to further discussion of the story topic and refrain from personal attacks and offensive language. SCO reserves the right to deny any comment. No comments that include hyperlinks will be posted. If you have a question for us, please include your email address or use this form.

  • Viju I on September 15, 2012 at 7:55 PM
    Good article Aanchal! New writer, but a lot better than many of the "veterans" of silver chips...
  • Ellen J.u on September 16, 2012 at 8:02 PM
    "Pentagon has not even decided whether they have enough solid ground to sue the author for giving information that may or may not be confidential."

    Well worded! Great conclusion too.
  • Ryan Grote (View Email) on October 5, 2012 at 7:12 PM
    Good and objective perspective on this book and the (perceived) underlying issues. This book is a recollection, as accurately as could be remembered, of an event that many in America dreamed of, ever since that day in 2001, me being one of those many. I was able to read the book a few weeks after it came out, and it made me think of my dad. My dad served in VietNam, and I never saw the negative of that war in my dad, in fact, my dad shared the beauty of the Southeast Asia landscape, and how the tiger claw prints he saw were larger than his hands, and how he never wanted to find that tiger!

    I remember wrestling with my dad, I was 19, my dad 46, and as I grabbed his hand to keep him from grabbing me, I noticed a neat scar along his hand, almost concealed by the natural wrinkle that occurs between an outside palm and wrist. I had never noticed it before (in all our previous wrestling matches), and I asked him where the scar came from. He said, very matter-of-factly, "I was blown through a fence". That was the first and only- time that my dad shared any negative experience about VietNam, but it made me begin to realize that I would never have to kill anyone, because of my dad, and that I would never have to think that way. Ever.

    Too many people want to share their opinion, share their "Rightous Attitude", but I disagree. War is the ugliest of ugly, and is the most costly of endeavors for the human race. Only those who have been involved in killing people have any right to comment on this book, and the rest of us can only defer to their perspective.

    The book is for everyone who has followed orders, has survived or not survived those orders, so that the rest of us can stupidly complain that there was "too much sensitive material" shared by the book's author.

    This book is for my dad, and I thank Matt for it.
Jump to first comment