Montgomery Blair High School's Online Student Newspaper
Tuesday, August 14, 2018 2:25 am
March 10, 2011

Unfair testing fees hinder education across the board

by Claire Boston, Editor-in-Chief
By most students' junior year, the bills begin to pile up. It usually starts with $13 for the PSAT. A couple months later, it might be $47 for the SAT, then another $18 to see a score report that's more than just three numbers out of 800. Factor in $21 for SAT Subject Tests, and in May, throw in a couple of Advanced Placement (AP) exams at $87 each. In a single school year, a student may shell out over $500 to the College Board, all in the name of college preparedness.

The College Board claims it has but one goal to ensure that every student has the opportunity to prepare for, enroll in and graduate from college. But there's a catch student success seems to come at a price, even in the years before college tuition bills are mailed. Despite its near-monopoly in many aspects of the college preparation industry, the College Board falls woefully short in actually helping students be successful in college.

In January, Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli ruled that requiring students to pay their own AP fees, a common practice in Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS), was illegal. In MCPS however, it is still legal that students pay for their own exams. While many students are fortunate enough to be able to afford the $87 fee to take an AP exam, those who cannot are at a disadvantage. While the College Board makes an effort to accommodate low-income students by providing fee waivers to all students who receive Free and Reduced Meals, extra paperwork and waiver restrictions can keep students from enjoying the same success as their higher-income peers.

Low-income students who wish to take AP tests can receive only a $22 discount on each exam. This brings the cost down to $65 per test, which is still more than the cost of the SAT, which the College Board will waive in full for eligible students. If the College Board recognizes that a $47 SAT may be too much of a financial burden for low-income families, it is illogical for them to expect families to be able to cover the cost of a $65 test, especially considering that many students take multiple AP exams at the end of each year. Even the College Board recognizes that this partial waiver plan makes little sense. So instead of fully funding AP tests for low-income students, it simply expects individual schools to foot the rest of the bill. This is unrealistic. In tough economic times, schools are looking to cut budgets, not add to them.

In 2010, MCPS budget documents indicate that MCPS students took nearly 30,000 AP exams. While it would be ideal for MCPS to follow the FCPS model and pay for students' AP tests, doing so would set the county back over $2 million. Therefore, the blame for inadequate funding and waivers still falls on the College Board. By refusing to fully subsidize AP tests for low-income students, the College Board denies students the opportunity to save money and earn college credit an important component of college preparation. In addition, the cost of AP tests may deter low-income students from signing up for the courses in the first place. According to the College Board's annual AP exam report, low-income students took only 21 percent of total AP exams.

If increasing AP participation among low-income students were a primary goal of the College Board's, it's not as if the organization lacks the funds to further subsidize APs.

The College Board says it spends $30 to $50 million on fee waivers each year, but that's barely a dent in their yearly revenue. Their 2009 tax returns indicated nearly $615 million in revenue, with a discrepancy of over $55.3 million between generated revenue and expenses.

Perhaps the millions in pure profit come from the slew of other fees the College Board charges students. Apart from test fees, almost every other College Board service even the college financial aid search program comes at an additional cost.

This is excessive. If the College Board's mission is as simple as its claim just to help students prepare for success in their college years, there are few reasons for a non-profit to charge so much, waive so little and act at all like a multi-million dollar for-profit corporation.

Share on Tumblr

Discuss this Article

Silver Chips Online invites you to share your thoughts about this article. Please use this forum to further discussion of the story topic and refrain from personal attacks and offensive language. SCO reserves the right to deny any comment. No comments that include hyperlinks will be posted. If you have a question for us, please include your email address or use this form.

  • Seriously on March 12, 2011 at 3:16 PM
    We are talking about $87 for 3 college credits (possibly as many as 8). Where can you get a better deal than that?
    • not here (View Email) on March 12, 2011 at 9:33 PM
      Many of the schools people want to go to don't take AP credits and are still disgustingly expensive. But you have to take APs to get in...

      So yeah, good deal? Not so much.
  • :) on March 12, 2011 at 4:28 PM
    finally. at least someone else realizes that all these fees are unfair and ridiculous.
  • Credits? on March 13, 2011 at 11:42 AM
    A lot of colleges don't even count certain APs for credits, or certain scores, especially if they're related to your major. The purpose of the tests often just serves as a means to show the college how well you did on the test, which is stupid. It doesn't cost that much to make a freaking test.
  • Senior on March 18, 2011 at 8:05 PM
    If the schools start paying for the tests, College Board will be able to jack up the prices per test since government bureaucracies don't work the same way as people. Then the school won't have enough money for our wonderful promethean boards or something actually useful.

    If your chosen level of college doesn't tend to accept AP's you don't have to take them, they're not a factor in admission.
    • Junior (View Email) on March 24, 2011 at 11:13 PM
      "they're not a factor in admission."

      I would beg to differ... though I suppose it depends on what kind of school you're applying to.
  • Cliff Warner on September 21, 2011 at 11:06 PM
    And why is accessing the College Board website more restrictive than my bank account? I can't even call them to register my student for a test! It's ridiculous and I'm fed up.

    Our son took the ACT instead and given that our daughter will have an A.A. two years of college under her belt at her High School commencement, I'm considering blowing off the testing altogether. If the colleges really want our money, and it's pretty clear that they do, her accomplishments should be sufficient without the testing and the extra costs we incur.
Jump to first comment