Montgomery Blair High School's Online Student Newspaper
Monday, December 11, 2017 4:13 am
Latest:
Tags: print
July 10, 2004

"Spider-Man 2": one awesome sequel

by Grace Harter, Page Editor
"Spider-Man 2" proves that it's not easy being a web-slinging, wall-climbing superhero. You can't win the girl of your dreams, there's no time to get homework done and you can't even wash your Spidey suit without accidentally dying your underwear pink. Not to mention your duty to stop the obligatory arch-villain bent on destroying the world.


Based on the comic book by Stan Lee and Steve Ditko, "Spider-Man 2" continues the story of Peter Parker (Tobey Maguire), an average nerd with some not-so-average super powers. Parker uses his powers, which include a "spider-sense," web-shooting abilities and wall-crawling, to battle crime in New York City. In the second movie, Parker faces off against the evil Otto Octavius (Alfred Molina), known as "Doc Ock" because of his eight limbs (four of which are huge, snake-like metal arms obtained in a freak science accident). Octavius is really not all bad, but unfortunately the creepy machine arms that stick out of his back and cause him to show a reckless disregard human life are in control of him.

Sound a little familiar? That's because "Spider-Man 2" has the same plot as the first movie: good scientist goes bad in a lab accident, and Spider-Man saves the day. However, "Spider-Man 2" more than makes up for the recycled plot through amazing special effects, humorous bits and an awesome nemesis. Doc Ock is much scarier than the goofy and manically cackling Green Goblin from "Spider Man." His metal arms move as though they are sentient beings and crush objects like cars and subway trains in an instant.

The visual effects in the film are stunning. Such action sequences as the fight between Spider-Man and Doc Ock on a runaway subway train are breathtaking. Spider-Man leaps through the air with such grace and agility that it's hard not to actually be jealous of his gifts.

One of the greatest things about "Spider-Man 2" is that director Sam Raimi spends as much time on the human aspects of Parker's life as the action sequences. The audience really gets to understand what Parker has to deal with by trying to lead a double life. Teen audience members can relate to Parker's lack of time and alienation. His homework doesn't get done, he disappoints those closest to him constantly and he can't seem to catch a break from anybody. He never gets credit for doing a thankless job.

"Spider-Man 2" is a little on the long side and does include some subplots that drag it out. Peter Parker's best friend, Harry Osborn (James Franco), the son of the Green Goblin, stumbles along in his own little subplot about his obsession to find and kill Spider-Man to revenge his father's death. While the storyline does get interesting at some points (including when Osborn discovers who Spider-Man really is), it would have been better if saved for the inevitable "Spider-Man 3."

Likewise, the ongoing love drama between Parker and Mary Jane Watson (Kirsten Dunst) gets long and boring after awhile. There is too much uncertainty between both parties for a believable romance, including Watson tearfully pleading with Parker to know what his "real feelings" for her are just after she announces that she will marry a famous astronaut. The audience is relieved when an exasperated Watson finally says, "Do you love me or not?" Finally! A real answer!

However, "Spider-Man 2," with stunning special effects and endearing human touches, easily crosses a seemingly unsurpassable barrier: the sequel is better than the original.

"Spider-Man 2" (127 minutes) is rated PG-13 for stylized action violence.



Share on Tumblr

Discuss this Article

Silver Chips Online invites you to share your thoughts about this article. Please use this forum to further discussion of the story topic and refrain from personal attacks and offensive language. SCO reserves the right to deny any comment. No comments that include hyperlinks will be posted. If you have a question for us, please include your email address or use this form.
 

  • Anon. on July 10, 2004
    I still have to get out and see this.
    Eric, it seems you have been beaten.
  • junior on July 10, 2004
    i'd like to see mr. glover's reaction to spider man 2.

    nice review
  • mathwin on July 13, 2004
    A Graber-like lead. Very promising Grace.
  • Hannah Rosen (View Email) on July 13, 2004
    I don't know, Grace. I found Spiderman 2, like you, visually endearing, but I was not impressed at all with the sequel. The story was unoriginal, the love plot was dull, and the fact that the last line in the movie was "Go get 'em, tiger" annoyed me. What about all the obvious, obnoxious religious metaphors? I'm not tryting to attack, just offer a different opinion. Just to tell you, I liked teh review very much.
  • mean person on July 14, 2004
    wow
    what crappy writing.
    also how many times are you gonna contradict yourself?
    did you mean maniacly cackling??
  • Anonymous on July 14, 2004
    Good article, but I really didn't like the movie. Dunst didn't impress me at all and the plot seemed to mirror the first movie. I thought that the tension between Osborn and Parker could have been developed more as well. The special effects were, as usual, impressive, but the charater development and the acting left much to be desired.
  • Greg Donaldson on July 15, 2004
    Anyone saying this movie is not good obviously is not a fan of Spiderman in general. Of course the plot is going to be similar. Crazy scientist mutates himself into crazy beast.... thats what Spiderman's villains always were. The last line was "go get 'em, tiger" because "tiger" is the nickname that MJ affectionately calls Peter once they get together. I loved that.

    The movie was absolutely wonderful. It stayed true to the story Stan Lee wrote in the original comic books and successfully translated that into a beautiful film. Tobey Maguire further proves in this installment, that he is the perfect Peter Parker. The sequence where he goes back to being a dork was true art. If you know who MJ is supposed to be you know Dunst did a fabulous job of playing the part.

    In conclusion, stop whining, and dont be so quick to insult the spiderman story-line if you dont know how it all goes.
  • monica on July 28, 2004
    back off greg. it's her opinion not yours
  • what!!?? on July 28, 2004
    WHAT!!!??? this movie stunk
  • re on July 30, 2004
    grace spelled "maniacally" correct, mean person.
Jump to first comment