Side Bar

June 2, 2009

New lunchtime hallway policies implemented

Sophia Deng, Online Managing Editor
Principal Darryl Williams and security personnel implemented restrictions on where Blazers are able to eat during 5A and 5B lunch as of last week. Due to these policies, students are only allowed to eat in the outside courtyards, SAC or Blair Boulevard region in front of the Media Center. Blazers also cannot walk in the classroom hallways on any of the three floors without passes signed by teachers. These policies will continue until the end of the school year and will potentially extend to next year, according to security assistant Paul Barker.

The yellow gate has given trouble to Blazers who want to walk along Blair Boulevard.
Photo by Alex Joseph
Unruly and obstructive student behavior incited the new lunchtime changes. "There was too much trash in the hallways, and there was too much noise near the main office," Barker said. "Rules are made when people violate their freedoms."

Williams implemented the policies after security brought these problems to his attention. "Security came to me and made a request, and there were concerns from staff as well," Williams said. "Mr. Boatman constructed a proposal to address the lunchtime issues."

In order to prevent students from walking around the school during lunch, security guards have been stationed in several hallways on each floor. A yellow gate has also been placed in front of the Media Center to prevent student traffic. In addition to restrictions on where students eat lunch, plans exist to remove the benches situated along Blair Boulevard, according to security assistant Tanesha Taylor.

Student reactions to the changes have been largely negative and frustrated Blazers have begun to take action. In response to the hallway regulations, junior Michelyn Bouknight began a petition against the restrictions on Monday. "I feel as though they are treating us as prisoners," she said. Bouknight is especially angry about the administration's plans to remove the benches. "They are complaining about trash, but I don't think these policies indicate the best solution." After obtaining more signatures, Bouknight plans to take the petition directly to Williams.

Security personnel speculate that the restrictions will continue to be implemented next year. However, decisions are still in the making, and Blazers may get their lunchtime privileges back in the future, according to Taylor.
Digg del.icio.us StumbleUpon reddit Facebook

Discuss this Article

  • kicked out of her lunch spot on June 3, 2009 at 12:11 PM
    How can they possible remove the benches? For now, we can mostly fit in the areas they've confined us to because there are no seniors and it's nice enough to eat outside, but next winter, all Blair's students could not possibly fit in the SAC and the lockers nearby. They cannot keep these policies next year. Forcing students to eat on the floor isn't sanitary. The hallway policies shouldn't even be in place this year. Students need to see their teachers and use their computer labs during lunch, and they can't always get passes. There are a few ways to get around them, but still. It does feel like a prison.
  • NK (View Email) on June 3, 2009 at 1:13 PM
    The restrictions preventing walking through the halls during lunch are proving to be a major annoyance. Every other day at lunch for the past school year I've gone to one of three places to get work done: the Macintosh lab in room 316, the English lab in 174, or the Media Centre. Now, when I try to go anywhere other than the Media Centre, I'm stopped by staff who insist that I need a teacher's pass to use the school's resources. I depend on these labs to finish up work before the start of class 5B. Now I'm restricted to the Media Centre, which is often brimming full with students with a long line waiting to use the limited number of computers available. Ironically, the Media Centre staff had always referred students to lab 174 whenever all of their workstations were in use; now, unless students have work to make up, this is no longer an option.
  • SES on June 3, 2009 at 3:04 PM
    This is the most ridiculous policy ever. It doesn't even benefit the school OR the students. I think that in our school, there are more dangerous things than students wandering around hallways. So how about the guards actually do their job and keep the school safe, instead of telling students that they can't go in to a teacher pick up homework from the day before because they don't have a pass? And how about the issue of space? They implemented this after the seniors were mostly gone. Next year the new freshmen will come and there is no way that there will be enough space for all us. Sure they kicked me out of my lunch spot, but I was also enjoyed being able to stop by a teachers classroom in the middle of lunch just to ask a small question. My acedemics are actually going to suffer. So, that's what the administration wants? Sorry, didn't think so.
  • Annoyed on June 3, 2009 at 4:06 PM
    Students would've certainly appreciated it if we had received some warning. Instead, I found myself barred from seeing my counselor at lunch. There's no way I could have known that I ought to have a pass for that, and I certainly wasn't doing anything wrong.

    As far as I'm concerned, I'll just not go down to the SAC. Many computer labs are open and a lot of teachers are open. But I still feel like this policy punishes the orderly students just trying to see their teachers at lunch. As for the rest? There's plenty of space to mess around in the rest of the school and off school grounds. For that matter, it's just extra incentive to hop off the school campus at lunch.

    If administration wants to make a real difference, it's going to come from being a little less cynical and believing that at least some students are willing to quiet down and pick up their trash if asked nicely. Please. It doesn't take that much effort to just make an announcement over the PA to ask us to please pick up our trash, before suddenly keeping us fenced in.
    • mhmmm on June 3, 2009 at 8:21 PM
      But even if you don't go down to the SAC, they will stop you from roaming around the back halls, even if you have a reasonable destination.
      It's insane and utterly unecessary.
      • Frustrated on June 5, 2009 at 12:10 PM
        No, they don't. They don't care. I've found it easier to just not go down to the SAC as well, because otherwise there is no way for me to get to one of the computer labs and attempt to get some extra work done. Unfortunately this also means not eating lunch if I happen to not bring one that day. This policy is only punishing the good students who want to use their lunchtime productively. If the administration wants to reduce the trashing of the school, confining everyone to one small area is not the solution. There are trash cans all over the school; it's not like the SAC has magical qualities that somehow induce people who normally don't use trash cans to suddenly start using them.
  • oh tennnnn on June 3, 2009 at 6:00 PM
    These policies will definitely not last next year.
    A whole new class of students will be arriving next year. And as mentioned, when winter comes it will be impossible to confine everyone in the SAC.

    The idea to remove the benches is completely ludicrous.

    And what about things like the vending machines that are past the media center? That gives money to the school.

    It is ridiculous how the administrators and security guards feel the need to exert so much authority over us. Honestly, this is a public school. Why are there large yellow barricades trying to hinder us? We're just teenagers at high school. This isn't some sort of juvenile delinquent insitution.

    And teachers are always encouraging us to come in for lunch for extra help and other opportunities that are not available during class time.

    This whole thing is completely unnecessary.
    But it's definitely not going to work out next year, so we'll just have to endure it for these last two weeks.
  • hm on June 3, 2009 at 6:14 PM
    everyone boycott school until they take these things down!
  • anonymous on June 3, 2009 at 8:44 PM
    Several things to point out:
    Only several studets or student-groups are the source of the trash and only they should be targeted/restricted by security. It is completely unfair for the rest of the students to suffer loss of privlages for something they never came close to doing.
    By the way, I admit that I have not eaten in the SAC for many months, because it's noisy and is in an inconvenient location. I have actually eaten outside of the computer lab 316 for quite a while and never got "caught" for eating in the "wrong area". (It's just much quieter there and much more conveniently located.) Also, after I go down to the library or office for something at the beginning of lunch, I just head on to the third floor. No one stops me or anything. Once a guard just asked me where I was going and I said "to room 314" and he let me go. If you're alone and look like you're not fooling around, then people generally won't bother you.
  • Seth and Amy on June 3, 2009 at 8:56 PM
    Really, Mr. Williams? Not gonna let us eat in the hallway in which there are no classrooms attached and bending machines are accessible? Really? Are you really going to prevent us from going to classrooms so we may further enhance our education? Did you not think the ID policy was stupid enough? REALLY?
    • Seth and Amy on June 3, 2009 at 10:12 PM
      Are you serious? We will continue to make sarcastic comments about this situation. ARE YOU SERIOUS?
    • teehee on June 3, 2009 at 10:13 PM
      This policy is crazy. We need to go there and we need to FIX IT!!
    • Interestingly enough... on June 3, 2009 at 11:49 PM
      They're being lax about IDs. If you arrive late in the mornings there's no one someone checking that you have an ID on.
  • disappointed blair student on June 3, 2009 at 9:49 PM
    Security guards should be able to handle the students who are disruptive without punishing the entire school for it. If I decide to eat my lunch down stairs and then remember that I have to make up a quiz, they won't let me because I can't go past the yellow fence? It's absolutely ridiculous to confine several hundreds of students at a time in such a small area when some of us need to do work in a quiet setting. The complaint that students cause too much of a mess is often exaggerated with the exception of the few students who seem to purposely make a mess. With almost half of Blair's students cramped in an area far less than even 1/6 of the school, you can still expect just as much trash. Security is important but this is ridiculous...lunch should at least be mildly fun. What kind of fun do high schoolers get during lunch if they have to cramp up next to their friends and people they don't even know on a wall during lunch...this is something I would expect to be done to middle or elementary school kids.
    This WON'T work next year. Blair's administration needs to take more time to think through their decisions and start treating the students with much more respect rather than yelling at us all the time because they happen to be having a bad day.
  • student on June 3, 2009 at 11:59 PM
    maybe there's the teeniest bit of justification in these new policies. but aside from being not well thought-out and way overboard, what really ticks me off is the failure of the administration to convey its concerns to the students.

    i was never aware that students were messing around on the upper floors and leaving a lot of trash lying around. I have also never heard an administrator go on the intercom and warn us that stuff is going on that needs to stop -- or else strict lunch policies will be enforced. All i know is all of a sudden, I can't go upstairs to finish a computer program during lunch.

    so what's going on? why didn't we even get a warning before these useless policies were foisted upon us? if there really needs to be some change, it's better communication between the administration and the student population.
  • interested student on June 4, 2009 at 10:09 AM
    Despite the problems, I found that it's possible to go around the fences by sneaking into the 160s hallway and going through the first floor classrooms. They aren't blocking off that hallway so they won't notice.
    • C on June 5, 2009 at 11:30 AM
      They will notice now that you've said it.
    • ... on June 5, 2009 at 12:13 PM
      They have now. I've done that before, but when I tried that today I was told (shouted at, more like) that I could not go anywhere unless I had a pass. If the teachers are going to enforce a policy as ridiculous as this one, they could at least treat us with a little more respect.
    • not really on June 7, 2009 at 2:04 PM
      Some people in my French class (5A) had to go to blair boulevard for something (I don't know what, its not my business). Our teacher told them to just go and come back. The hall monitors wouldn't let them back into that hallway without a pass. They had to miss the rest of their class.
  • glad to be gone on June 4, 2009 at 10:20 PM
    You need a pass to see teachers? Lunch is often the only reasonable time you can find a teacher to talk to them. Obviously, if you have a pass to go see a teacher, you'd have talked to them about whatever it was already... Catch-22, anyone?
  • 11 on June 4, 2009 at 11:29 PM
    How do I sign that petition?!!!!!!!
  • wow on June 5, 2009 at 8:31 AM
    THIS IS REALLY STUPID.
    What are they gonna do next year when all of the classes are here?? I love michelyn and i signed that petition because this is some bull. This is so stupid. They cant expect to make rules and enforce them at the end of the year and williams cant expect that all blazers can fit into the SAC next year. If they are complainig about trash then why dont the janitors actually go around during lunch and get the people who throw the trash instead of chillln in the cafeteria talking like they always do and then complaining about it. This is a ridiculous policy that obviously wasnt thought out, and if they try to enforce it next year there will be problems.
  • wow on June 5, 2009 at 8:46 AM
    Where you find the laws most numerous, there you will also find the greatest injustice-Arcesilaus

    I had found a quote once but i cant remember it, but it was about how they create laws because they have to show other people they have power. Because the more laws you make, the more people you can get in trouble because someone will break them. And the more people you get in trouble the better you can show your power. The administration is trying to show us they have power, This is unnecessary and ridiculous. All they are showing us is that they are stupid and dont think things out.
  • someone on June 6, 2009 at 10:19 PM
    As one of the many good students who tries to get things done at lunch, I find this policy to be absolutely absurd. As a SCHOOL - a center of learning - the building is essentially turning into a prison. Why should we be restricted from going to see teachers, from going to academic support, from going to see counselors, from going to see administrative staff?
    This policy seems to have been a quick reaction to some complaints by janitorial staff that really was not thought through AT ALL! The administration has so many other things it could be thinking about now - including trying to prevent teachers from leaving Blair, keeping funds and working to improve the school that this new policy is ridiculous and a waste of time. I've talked to teachers who agree - how are timid students doing poor academically going to be encouraged to see teachers at lunch if there is a bright yellow gate with teachers yelling at them stopping them in their paths? Those who start to make their way to teachers' rooms thinking "should I ask the teacher about that test that I did poorly on?" see the gate and in an instant decide against it simply because of the inconvenience.
    Of course, there will always be "delinquents" who try to get around rules and cause disruption. But this will occur no matter what! Have security stop people they encounter in the act instead of stand idly, and you will deter the vast majority of these. Assume students are there to learn - not to cause disruption. That SHOULD differentiate us from unnamed schools in DC that have been so famously advertised in the Washington Post.
  • wylie on June 9, 2009 at 11:54 PM
    Because I need to use the computer labs and upper floors so often, I have a few ways of bypassing the yellow fences:

    1. I am a student aid. This basically gives me a sticker on my ID that gives me a reason for going almost anywhere, as long as I'm "helping a teacher."

    2. I have a valid pass written by a teacher on the third floor in my agenda. The teacher only wrote one, but I've used it three or four times to get upstairs.

    3. Stay on the upper floors at the beginning of lunch. As long as you don't need to go into the SAC, nobody will stop you.

    While it's a ridiculous system on principle, it's so easy to circumvent that you shouldn't have trouble getting where you need. You just need to be a bit prepared.
  • David (View Email) on June 11, 2009 at 4:56 PM
    Ummmmm, this is a Jail!
  • frustrated. on June 18, 2009 at 10:49 PM
    wow they are really goin overboard. removin the benches though? too much. and i def. dont evn like the new security guards. Whats the point of keepin us in one area? Blair has soo many kids, when next year comes and its evn more crowded i hope they dont expect us to follow this policy. I missed a review day for my final exams because i "didnt have a pass". I mean really what are we gonna do if we go past the yellow gate. find more classrooms?? Ohhh scary!
Leave a Comment