Montgomery Blair High School's Online Student Newspaper
Sunday, October 22, 2017 12:48 am
Latest:
Oct. 27, 2009

A suspension of sense

by Anya Gosine, Online Managing, Op/Ed and Food Editor
Last Wednesday, the school board of the Christina School District in Delaware made a decision to revoke the 45-day suspension of 6-year-old Zachary Christie. The first-grader’s initial infraction? Bringing a Cub Scout utensil that combines a fork, spoon and knife to school for his lunch.

The Christina School District is one of the many districts throughout the nation that have a zero-tolerance policy on weapons, grounded from past tragic events such as the Columbine High School and Virginia Tech massacres. Based on the Christina School District’s Student Code of Conduct, any possession of a weapon, regardless of the student’s intent will immediately result in severe punishment. While a zero-tolerance policy on weapons is surely in the best interest of students and their parents, Christie’s case clearly exemplifies its adverse effects on a child’s well-being and the judgment of the school system.

The most prominent flaw in zero-tolerance policies is their lack of common sense - officials should be able to apply discretion on a case-by-case basis to avoid criminalizing the innocent. Technically, a sharpened pencil, ruler or book has a similar potential-threat level to that of a knife. If this distinction is made, equally reasonable judgment should be extended to the involved individuals.

But because discretion cannot be applied, minor infractions such as Christie’s are always treated on a more serious level, which consequently causes more disruption to students’ education. Unjust punishments of students based on overly-stringent rules causes mistrust of the school’s authority amongst students and teachers, which ultimately will lead to a less safe environment.

Shockingly, it is not the first time the Christina School district has encountered controversy surrounding their weapon policies. Last year, Delaware lawmakers granted school boards to “on a case-by-case basis, modify the terms of the expulsion” after a third-grader was expelled for having a knife with which to cut her birthday cake. The case-by-case criterion, however, could not be applied in Christie’s case because it does it applies to only expulsions, not suspensions.

In the aftermath of Christie, the Christina School Board did make amendments to its policies: for future possession of a weapon by a kindergartener or first grader, suspension is now limited to 3 – 5 days. How this will help future elementary students avoid undeserved punishment, however, is unclear. It is not unlikely a second, third, fourth or fifth grader will make a mistake equally innocent to that of a kindergartener or first grader, yet they will still suffer more severe punishment. In addition, the amendment still does not allow for the essential case-by-case evaluation of the student’s intent.

Christie’s bringing of his Boy Scout utensil to school was certainly against the school’s policies, but more importantly, it was a mistake. Suspension for unintentionally violating a school’s rule benefits no one. When the tainted face of school officials, outrage of parents and disrupted education of students are all added up, it is clear that zero-tolerance, reflective of its name, is worth nothing.



Share on Tumblr

Discuss this Article

Silver Chips Online invites you to share your thoughts about this article. Please use this forum to further discussion of the story topic and refrain from personal attacks and offensive language. SCO reserves the right to deny any comment. No comments that include hyperlinks will be posted. If you have a question for us, please include your email address or use this form.
 

  • knuckleheads on October 27, 2009 at 10:13 PM
    this is just another case of adults making laws just to make laws, not because they will be helpful. what could a principal be thinking when he tells the kid's parents that he cant bring utensils to school?
  • Eli Barnett on October 27, 2009 at 11:38 PM
    Right on, very good article. Well written and concise.
  • someone on October 31, 2009 at 12:02 PM
    agreed
  • ugh on November 3, 2009 at 8:46 AM
    This kid is 6 years old???!!! what they shouldve done is tell the parents the child cannot bring this to school, not suspend the 6 year old who proabably has no idea what is going on.
Jump to first comment