Montgomery Blair High School's Online Student Newspaper
Monday, July 16, 2018 5:00 am
March 4, 2010

Out of the dark

by Rose Wynn, Online Sports Editor
For 16 years, they've served in silence. They've risked their lives for those who didn't believe in them, for states that denied their right to love and for a country that forced them to conceal their true identity. They've watched commanding officers grimly dismiss their qualified brothers and sisters from service because of who they are.

Senator Joseph I. Lieberman, left, at a briefing with former Maj. Mike Almy, who was discharged from the Air Force in 2006. Courtesy of New York Times
Senator Joseph I. Lieberman, left, at a briefing with former Maj. Mike Almy, who was discharged from the Air Force in 2006.
But now there is hope for change. Yesterday, Senator Joseph Lieberman (I - Conn.), introduced a bill to repeal the ban on openly gay service members in the military, the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy. If Congress stays true to its word, these men and women will be allowed to show their true colors.

Not only does a repeal of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" offer gay and lesbian service members the right to expose their identity, but it also saves them from psychological trauma. According to the New York Times, one soldier who had served on both Afghani and Iraqi soil identified "cover-ups of the truth and a forced level of disingenuousness in the name of unit cohesion" as factors that contributed to the policy's detrimental effect on gay soldiers.

Ironically, many supporters of the law argue it preserves unit cohesion. John M. Shalikashvili, Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman from 1993 - 1997, initially supported the belief that "homosexuality is incompatible with [military] service" and that lower troop confidence and less enlisting would result from openly gay service members. But a recent Zogby International poll found that 24 nations worldwide allow gays to serve openly in the military and none have reported issues with recruitment or morale.

Still, politicians claim that openly gay service members would make living circumstances uncomfortable and soldiers ill at ease. On the contrary, a recent study by RAND's (a name derived from the contraction of "research and development") National Defense Research Institute found that open homosexuality in the military has no harmful effect. The study, "Sexual Orientation and U.S. Military Personnel Policy," concluded gays and lesbians in the military remained generally cautious about revealing their identity to other service members and did not call special attention to themselves in ways that would diminish troop cohesion or effectiveness. Of the seven countries investigated, "none reported any impairment in military performance resulting from the presence of homosexuals."

In addition to nationwide support, repealing "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" has practical advantages in a time of military need. Admitting open homosexuals increases the number of eligible people who can serve overseas. More than 13,000 gay and lesbian service personnel have been dismissed in the 16-year lifespan of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell," according to the Servicemembers Legal Defense Network. Six hundred forty four homosexuals have been removed just since Obama took office, according to the New York Times. Even Shalikashvili admits, "Our military has been stretched thin by our deployments in the Middle East, and we must welcome the service of any American who is willing and able to do the job."

Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Admiral Mike Mullen advocated to end the 16-year old "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy before a Senate committee. Courtesy of New York Times
Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Admiral Mike Mullen advocated to end the 16-year old "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy before a Senate committee.
Despite the benefits of repeal, some political figures are battling with the potential political repercussions of such controversy. Congress' current agenda includes pressing initiatives with needed bipartisan support, such as finding a better strategy in Iraq; it cannot risk political cleavage with a rushed decision on "Don't Ask, Don't Tell." Internal strife has already delayed negotiations, as the Pentagon is debating whether to postpone repeal until 2011, when the U.S. is no longer fighting in both Iraq and Afghanistan.

But why wait and make excuses? Why deny able-bodied service members a right to serve at a time when we need them the most?

In his State of the Union address, Obama promised "to finally repeal the law that denies gay Americans the right to serve the country they love because of who they are." But this is not the time for vague political rhetoric. Congress should not delay the repeal of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" by spluttering excuses and procrastinating. Gays and lesbians may not have the same sexual identity as their fellow service members, but they share everything that matters: honor, excellence, a will to defend the country, a desire to uphold patriotic values and a readiness to sacrifice themselves for America.

Share on Tumblr

Discuss this Article

Silver Chips Online invites you to share your thoughts about this article. Please use this forum to further discussion of the story topic and refrain from personal attacks and offensive language. SCO reserves the right to deny any comment. No comments that include hyperlinks will be posted. If you have a question for us, please include your email address or use this form.

  • iDisagree on March 23, 2010 at 12:16 AM
    u kno, i think it's interesting that Silver Chips only allow thier writers to write OpEds because last time I checked OpEds were supposed to be a way for the COMMUNITY to express their opinions.
    It has been my experience that a lot of people in Silver Chips have a similar manner of thinking and thus, there is a GREAT bias in this paper.
    not saying that Chips over all isn't a great paper, especially as far as school news papers go, I'm just saying that, I for one, would really appreciate it if Chips would open up the option for other members of the Blair community to say thier bit, so that readers could get a better representation of how thier peers feel about current events.

    Then again, maybe most Blazers are so concerned with the state of thier new Nikes or March Madness or what guy is going to ask them to prom that they don't have the time to be concerned with community issues, in which case, my suggestion would be null and void, however, it is only a suggestion and I would greatly appreciate it if one of the Chips editors would be kind enough to at least take it into consideration.
Jump to first comment