Montgomery Blair High School's Online Student Newspaper
Friday, July 20, 2018 3:06 am
July 12, 2011

Evidence over allegation

by Saaraa Farooq, Online News Editor
On July 17, Casey Anthony will be freed from jail just two weeks after she was acquitted on July 5 for various counts including first-degree murder in relation to her daughter Caylee Anthony's death. Although this date seems soon, it was delayed from Anthony's original release date of July 13 because Anthony was found guilty of misconduct for lying to the police about her missing daughter.

Many people out there are probably outraged at the jury's 'not guilty' verdict and believe that it was an injustice to Caylee. People may believe that Casey Anthony deserved to be punished because she was responsible for her daughter's death. People may also be shocked at how the jury could make this decision, a decision of life or death, in a mere eleven hours. The public has been labeling this trial as the new O.J. Simpson case because he was also acquitted of all allegations set upon him when he was accused of murdering his ex-wife Nicole Simpson and her friend Ronald Goldman.

Casey Anthony and her attorney show relief after the verdict was delivered. Courtesy of The Washington Post
Casey Anthony and her attorney show relief after the verdict was delivered.
According to The Washington Post, the final sentence for Anthony was four years in jail, but she was credited with the time she already served, adding up to at least 1000 days. Anthony's sentence was based on the guilty verdict of misconduct because she did not report her missing daughter for thirty-one days in 2008 which eventually led to numerous lies to the police to cover up Caylee’s disappearance. This behavior added a few more days to her sentence, but it still did not appease the public. The fact that Anthony did not report her missing child for as long as she did is simply not acceptable and makes her argument considerably elusive.

Though anger about the verdict is justified, the prosecution did not have any direct evidence linking Anthony to her daughter's death. Due to the insufficient evidence, the jury was not able to convict Anthony and so the jury should not be blamed for the lack of punishment. The issue was that the prosecution failed to provide evidence in support of their argument, so punishment could not be given since the crime could not be proven in the first place. Casey Anthony may or may not be guilty for all of the allegations posed upon her, but the fact is that there was no evidence which directly pointed to her as the murderer. This fact is true whether or not anyone chooses to believe she committed the crime. If the accusations are true, then of course she should be punished. However, since her argument did appear to be a bit farfetched, these suspicions cannot be held as the grounds to convict her even if the allegations posed upon her are true.

As a result of Anthony's fishy argument, the prosecutors and a wide range of media commentators tried to portray Anthony as a careless, party girl based on photographs and recordings of her partying with friends to exhibit that she was not grieving. Prosecutors asserted that Anthony killed her child so that she could spend time with her boyfriend and enjoy a carefree life of partying. The defense argued from the beginning that Caylee drowned accidentally in her family’s swimming pool and that Anthony and her father, George Anthony, concealed her death in a panic. Prosecutors were hurt by the fact that it is not known exactly how or when Caylee died because her body was too badly decomposed to determine the cause of her death.

Nevertheless, whether or not justice was reached in the courtroom, the jury should not be held responsible even if they were wrong because they reached their decision based on the evidence they were given. Anthony was held accountable for the actions that were successfully proven, but she cannot be punished based on suspicions that don't have strong evidence behind them.

After the long and frustrating trial in the fight to obtain justice for Caylee Anthony, it can be agreed that a debacle like this should never happen again. Whether it is child abuse or even an accident, greater efforts should be made on both sides of the courtroom to obtain justice, not a fight simply to label one side the victor because of lack of evidence on the other.

Share on Tumblr

Discuss this Article

Silver Chips Online invites you to share your thoughts about this article. Please use this forum to further discussion of the story topic and refrain from personal attacks and offensive language. SCO reserves the right to deny any comment. No comments that include hyperlinks will be posted. If you have a question for us, please include your email address or use this form.

  • Bonnie Walker (View Email) on July 13, 2011 at 1:31 AM
    What sucks is some of years she was credited for was for stealing and writing bad checks. So she isn't even serving 4 years. What a Justice system we have.
  • brotherap (View Email) on July 14, 2011 at 2:25 AM
    The investigative team OMIG has been working on the Simpson case since 1996 and reveal their findings in the recently published book.​uit-Exhibit-Simpson-murder​-trial/dp/1456313169/ref=s​r_1_1?
    OJ Simpson was framed by members of his own defense team cooperating with prosecutors to orchestrate the monstrosity called "the trial of the century". Evidence that could have established Simpson's innocence was kept from the jury as Johnnie Cochran mistakenly admits here.​A.
  • Hmmm... on July 21, 2011 at 5:59 PM
    That's true. There was simly not enough evidence to link the baby's death with her mother. Though the 31 or so days the baby was not reported missing sound sketchy still, but the jury found her not guilty. Leave the poor woman alone to grieve the death of of her adorable little baby. Great article.
  • alumnae3 on July 25, 2011 at 6:23 PM
    If the DA didnt seek the death penalty she woulda been found guilty.
    If Nancy Grace hadnt given her press Casey would have just had the public defender that private atty Jose Baez.
Jump to first comment